Due Process Is Not Optional: Why the National Assembly’s Authentication of the Tax Reform Acts Upholds Law, Order, and Democratic Integrity

By Philip Agbese

In every constitutional democracy, the legitimacy of law does not rest on sentiment or speed, but on process. Laws derive their authority not merely from political will or popular approval, but from scrupulous adherence to the procedures laid down by the Constitution and statute. It is against this background that recent public commentary surrounding the authentication, assent, and gazetting of key tax reform legislation must be understood, and properly situated within Nigeria’s constitutional order.

The National Assembly, as the custodian of legislative authority, has responded not with defensiveness or evasion, but with institutional sobriety. The leadership of both Chambers has activated the very safeguards that give law its moral and legal force: verification, certification, and transparency. This is not an act of weakness. It is the essence of legislative strength.

The press release issued by the Management of the National Assembly makes this point unambiguously. Faced with questions relating to the harmonisation, assent, and gazetting of the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025; the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025; the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, 2025; and the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025, the legislature chose the path of constitutional due diligence rather than public polemics . That choice deserves commendation.

At the heart of the matter is the Acts Authentication Act, Cap. A4, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. This statute exists for a simple but profound reason: to ensure that what is passed by the legislature, assented to by the President, and published for public reliance is the same text. Authentication is not an optional bureaucratic ritual; it is the bridge between legislative intent and legal certainty. Without it, the integrity of the statute book itself would be compromised.

The steps undertaken by the National Assembly, as illustrated in the published authentication process, reflect long-established parliamentary practice. From the preparation of the certified true copy of the Bill after enactment, through compilation and certification of the schedule of Bills for assent, to gazetting and official publication, each stage serves a distinct constitutional purpose. Collectively, they form a chain of custody for the law. Break that chain, and legal chaos follows.

Crucially, the leadership has been careful to clarify that the ongoing internal review does not concede any defect in legislative authority, nor does it encroach upon the functions of the Executive or Judiciary. It is an internal, administrative exercise aimed at clarity, accuracy, and the sanctity of the legislative record . In constitutional terms, this is precisely how a mature legislature should behave: correcting its own processes where necessary, without grandstanding or blame-shifting.

There is also a moral dimension that should not be overlooked. Tax legislation affects every citizen, every business, and the fiscal stability of the state. Such laws must command confidence. When the legislature demonstrates that it is willing to pause, verify, and certify before insisting on finality, it reinforces public trust. Due process is not the enemy of reform; it is the condition that makes reform legitimate and durable.

The legal effect of this approach is equally important. Official gazetting and the issuance of certified true copies provide courts, regulators, investors, and citizens with an authoritative text upon which rights and obligations can safely be based. In an era where disputes often turn on the precise wording of statutes, the insistence on authentication is not pedantry. It is prudence.

Those urging haste over process should reflect on comparative experience. In established democracies, legislatures routinely delay commencement, correct clerical inconsistencies, and re-certify statutes to protect the integrity of the legal order. Nigeria is not being exceptional; it is being orthodox.

Ultimately, the National Assembly’s actions reaffirm a deeper constitutional principle: that law is greater than politics, and procedure is the guardian of substance. By acting within the Constitution, the Acts Authentication Act, Standing Orders, and established parliamentary conventions, the leadership has shown fidelity not just to power, but to responsibility.

In defending due diligence, the National Assembly is defending the rule of law itself. That is not merely legal correctness. It is a democratic virtue.

Agbese LLB[UK], LLM [UK], MBA[UK] is the Deputy Spokesperson of the House of Representatives.

Reps Minority Caucus Demands Suspension of Tax Reform Laws Amid Allegations of Fraudulent Alterations

The Minority Caucus of the House of Representatives has thrown its weight behind calls for a full investigation into alleged fraudulent alterations to the recently enacted tax reform laws, warning Nigerians to disregard any versions of the statutes circulating without proper authentication by the Clerk to the National Assembly and the President’s signature.

In a press release issued on Sunday, December 28, 2025, signed by the Minority Leader, Rep. O.K. Chinda, Minority Whip Rt. Hon. Ali Isa J.C., PhD, Deputy Minority Leader Rt. Hon. Aliyu Madaki, and Deputy Minority Whip Rt. Hon. George Ozodinobi, the caucus expressed deep consternation over the ongoing controversy surrounding the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025; Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025; Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, 2025; and Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025.

The caucus described the allegations — that the laws were unlawfully altered after passage by both chambers and assent by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu — as grave and deserving of urgent scrutiny.

The matter gained prominence when a member raised the issue during a recent plenary session, prompting the House to inaugurate a high-powered committee to probe the claims of fraudulent alterations, improper gazetting, and the circulation of tampered versions to the public.

“We are also aware that this issue has been raised by a member of the House of Representatives during one of our recent plenaries, following which the House inaugurated a high-powered committee to investigate the allegations,” the release stated.

“The Minority Caucus of the House of Representatives will stand with the entire House to ensure that the circumstances surrounding this illegality are exposed and the culprits brought to book in the interest of justice for all Nigerians.”

The caucus emphasised that the National Assembly remains the custodian of the authentic copies of all laws passed by the legislature.

It stressed that legitimate gazetting procedures begin with the Clerk to the National Assembly transmitting the official versions to the appropriate federal agency for publication.

“We are aware of the legitimate procedures towards the gazetting of laws, and it starts with the Clerk to the National Assembly (CNA) transmitting the actual copies of the laws to the relevant federal agency that gazettes all government documents,” the statement continued.

“The National Assembly is always the custodian of the genuine documents of the laws of the federation that have been passed.”

The Minority Caucus urged the public and businesses to reject any purported versions of the tax laws lacking the signatures of the CNA and the President, describing such documents as fake and an assault on legislative independence.

“Any attempt to foist fake laws on Nigerians is an attack on the independence and constitutional role of the National Assembly in safeguarding our democracy,” the release warned.

“The Caucus will unconditionally protect the independence of the Legislature and our democracy.”

The caucus called on the Federal Government to immediately suspend implementation of the tax reform laws until the ongoing investigations are concluded and full clarity is established on the authentic texts.

“Consequently, we call on the government to suspend the implementation of the tax laws until investigations are concluded and there is clarity and certainty of the law to be implemented,” the statement read.

“Moreover, Nigerians and the business community are entitled to copies of the laws that they are expected to obey.”

The caucus expressed confidence in President Tinubu’s democratic credentials, appealing to him to heed the call for suspension and transparency.

“We count on Mr. President’s democratic credentials to be responsive and responsible and heed to this call,” it concluded.

The release ended with a blessing for the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the signatures of the four principal officers of the Minority Caucus.

Terrorism financing: Group to mobilise One Million Match Against Malami’s Release from detention, wants former AGF sentenced to death by hanging

The Coalition Against Terrorism and Corruption (CATC) has announced plans to mobilize a one-million-man march to protest any attempt to release former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Abubakar Malami from EFCC detention, demanding instead that he be sentenced to death by hanging for allegedly enabling terrorism financing through massive money laundering.

In a statement signed by Dr. Hassan Adebayo, the group’s spokesperson, Malami was branded a “traitor in high office” whose actions have directly fueled terrorism, cost countless innocent lives, and betrayed the nation.

“Abubakar Malami, as AGF, turned his position into a criminal enterprise, laundering billions to arm terrorists and destabilize Nigeria while chasing a presidential ambition he later abandoned,” Adebayo stated.

“His alleged laundering of over N1 billion through Metropolitan Auto Tech Limited between 2022 and 2025 is not mere corruption—it is blood money that has killed Nigerians and left families in perpetual grief.”

Adebayo pointed to the EFCC’s 16-count charge, accusing Malami, his son, and associate Bashir Asabe of concealing and disguising illicit funds used to acquire luxury properties worth billions across Abuja, Kano, and Kebbi.

“He allegedly N500 million to buy a duplex in Maitama, retained N600 million as cash collateral for loans, and conspired to acquire assets in Jabi, Asokoro, and Gwarimpa—all funded by proceeds of crime that supported terrorism,” he said.

“While families buried loved ones killed by insurgents, Malami was busy buying mansions and plotting his political future on the blood of the innocent.”

The group condemned Malami’s role in allegedly acquiring over 41 properties traced to ₦212 billion in illicit funds.

“He disguised N1.36 billion through Meethaq Hotels Ltd, concealed N700 million for Hamonia Hotels, and laundered money for Rayhaan Hotels—all while presiding over the Ministry of Justice meant to protect Nigerians,” Adebayo charged.

“He turned the AGF office into a safe haven for terrorists and their financiers, ensuring that while our soldiers fought with limited resources, criminals like him thrived.”

Adebayo highlighted the human toll. “Every naira he allegedly laundered is a life lost, a family destroyed, a community terrorized. His betrayal is unforgivable, and the pain he inflicted on Nigerian families is irreparable,” he said.

The group warned against any bail or release, calling for the harshest punishment.

“We demand not just conviction but death by hanging for Malami—the ultimate penalty for a man who armed terrorists with laundered billions while holding the nation’s highest legal office,” Adebayo declared.

Adebayo concluded, “Abubakar Malami is a principal architect of insecurity. His actions—from laundering billions in Abuja to acquiring illicit properties nationwide—prove he prioritized personal greed and political ambition over the lives of Nigerians.

“He must face the gallows to send a message that betrayal of this magnitude will never be tolerated.”

Renewed Hope Ambassadors Network Names Bagudu as Best Performing Minister, NCC EVC as Best Performing Agency Head

The Renewed Hope Ambassadors Network has named Senator Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, as the Best Performing Minister of the Year and Dr. Aminu Maida, Executive Vice Chairman/CEO of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), as the Best Performing Agency Head.

The group said it came to this conclusion after a careful review of key promoters and stakeholders championing Mr. President’s ideological and developmental agenda.

It noted that Minister Bagudu came out tops for his outstanding contributions, loyalty, and strategic leadership in steering Nigeria’s fiscal policy and economic planning throughout 2025.

In a statement signed by Opialu Fabian Opialu, Bagudu was described as a “towering figure” whose tireless efforts have significantly advanced the Renewed Hope vision in economic stabilization and growth.

“Minister Abubakar Atiku Bagudu exemplifies the Renewed Hope vision through his relentless commitment to macroeconomic stability and inclusive development,” Opialu stated.

“His oversight of the ₦54.99 trillion 2025 budget has driven bold reforms, resulting in four consecutive quarters of GDP growth, exchange rate stability, and renewed investor confidence.”

Opialu highlighted Bagudu’s role in revising the National Development Plan and coordinating poverty reduction strategies.

“Bagudu has led effective implementation of the National Poverty Reduction with Growth Strategy across states, balancing fiscal responsibility with strategic investments in health, education, infrastructure, and agriculture,” he added.

He further praised Bagudu’s global engagements and sector synergies. “As Minister, Bagudu has championed partnerships, such as with Germany for the $1 trillion economy goal, and emphasized clean energy investments requiring $410 billion for net-zero by 2060, proving the administration’s commitment to sustainable prosperity,” Opialu said.

The Renewed Hope Ambassadors Network also recognized Dr. Aminu Maida as the Best Performing Agency Head for his contributions to digital innovation and telecommunications advancement.

“Dr. Aminu Maida’s efforts have elevated the NCC to among the top best-performing government agencies in 2025, creating a robust environment essential for economic progress under President Tinubu,” Opialu noted.

“Under Maida’s stewardship, the NCC has advanced data-driven regulation through the Quality of Experience Crowdsourcing Project and committed to broadband expansion and transparency,” he said.

Opialu concluded, “Both Bagudu and Maida are not just supporters; they are principled architects of the Renewed Hope agenda.

“Their actions—from steering economic policies to advancing digital infrastructure—demonstrate rock-solid commitment to President Tinubu’s transformative national project.”

Young farmer in SW China cultivates carbon-neutral rice, contributing to China’s green goals

By Li Kaixuan, People’s Daily

In the serene fields of Qionglai, southwest China’s Sichuan province, a young farmer’s meticulous record-keeping is doing more than tracking harvests, but meticulously documenting the carbon footprint of every grain. What began as a personal experiment in low-carbon farming has now turned into the production of certified “carbon-neutral rice,” offering a promising insight into the future of sustainable agriculture.

Huang Xin, a university-educated “new farmer” from Qionglai, recently observed with pride as boxes of “Ranyi rice” were prepared for delivery. Back in September, following a successful harvest, Huang organized a blind tasting at the fields, where a variety of rice samples were presented to a panel of local villagers and agricultural experts. The “Ranyi rice,” distinguished by its delicate texture and low carbon emissions, emerged as the unanimous favorite.

However, this rice represents more than just superior taste. This year, “Ranyi rice” underwent rigorous carbon footprint assessment and received certification as a carbon-neutral product from the Sichuan United Environmental Exchange, officially earning the distinction of “carbon-neutral rice.”

Why is it important for rice to be carbon-neutral?

For Huang, a local of Qionglai who returned to farming after completing his university studies, the project was about introducing innovation into traditional agriculture. As the green, low-carbon movement gained momentum, he saw an opportunity to produce rice in a sustainable manner, benefiting both the environment and China’s broader “dual carbon” goals.

Initially, Huang faced skepticism. When he presented his idea to Zhang Kaiguo, general manager of Sichuan-based Guotan Tech, Zhang expressed doubt. “Achieving carbon neutrality for an agricultural product is no simple task,” Zhang remarked.

The primary challenge, Zhang explained, lies in the complexity of carbon footprint accounting, which involves measuring the total greenhouse gas emissions and removals over a product’s entire life cycle. “In industrial operations, the calculation process is relatively straightforward, thanks to mature production data systems. However, agriculture is often non-standardized, relying heavily on personal experience. Accurate accounting requires detailed records of every farming activity and its associated emissions,” Zhang explained, acknowledging that such meticulous record-keeping is beyond the capabilities of many farmers.

Undeterred, Huang decided to persist. “I already kept records of agricultural inputs for economic purposes. Now I simply added a ‘low-carbon account,'” he explained, resolving to meet Zhang’s high standards.

The process was demanding: tracking began with the transportation of seeds and extended across more than 10 stages, including planting, field management, harvesting, and processing. In total, over 15 types of detailed data were required just for plot mapping alone. “Every detail had to be documented: fertilizer use per unit area, fuel consumption for machinery, and more,” Huang recalled. Each activity was meticulously logged with the oversight of relevant staff and third-party certifiers.

In spring this year, Huang cultivated 200 mu (approximately 13 hectares) of nationally certified premium rice, reviving the local “Ranyi rice” variety. As the seedlings matured, his “low-carbon ledger” became thicker.

Reducing emissions for sustainable rice cultivation

While record-keeping was vital, the question remained: how could carbon-neutral rice be effectively grown? The solution lay in reducing emissions.

“Chemical fertilizers and pesticides contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions,” Huang noted. To mitigate this, he adopted a hybrid approach, using bio-organic fertilizer alongside organic-inorganic compound fertilizers. “Bio-organic fertilizer can replace some chemical fertilizers, reducing both indirect emissions from production and transport, as well as methane emissions from rice paddies,” explained Huang.

In certain field corners, he placed paper bags containing trichogramma wasp eggs, a natural predator of the rice stem borer. “Using insects for pest control proved even more effective than expected,” he said.

By harvest time, carbon footprint assessments of the 200 mu of rice paddy revealed that the full life-cycle carbon emissions of “Ranyi rice” totaled 946.54 grams of CO2 equivalent per kilogram, nearly 50 percent lower than conventionally grown rice. Huang selected 20 tons of rice for carbon offsetting through the Sichuan United Environmental Exchange’s platform, securing its carbon-neutral certification. The journey of this single grain of rice to carbon neutrality has successfully reached its destination.

“With this certification, the rice now carries a green ‘ID card,'” Huang said. He designed special packaging for “Ranyi rice,” which includes a QR code that provides consumers with  full transparency regarding the product’s carbon footprint.

This year, the transition to carbon-neutral rice has brought tangible benefits to Huang’s farm: soil fertility has improved, and the quality of the produce has been enhanced. In Qionglai, several near-zero-carbon zones and carbon-neutral agricultural products are emerging, as the region embraces the green, low-carbon philosophy, injecting new vitality into its agricultural development.

Why is China actively expanding voluntary opening up?

By Luo Shanshan, People’s Daily

On Dec. 18, China launched island-wide special customs operations in the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP). As of Nov. 10, China had extended its unilateral visa-exemption arrangements for 48 countries. In an era of rising global protectionism, why is China choosing to further expand voluntary opening up?

Let’s start with the Hainan FTP.

Starting Dec. 18, 2025, Hainan has launched island-wide special customs operations, allowing freer entry of overseas goods, expanding zero-tariff coverage, and introducing more business-friendly measures. This initiative will significantly ease the entry and exit of people, goods, capital and data across Hainan, enhancing its position as a hub of global exchange.

What has expanded opening up brought?

The results are evident in Hainan’s development. Since the release of an overall plan for the development of the Hainan FTP in June 2020, Hainan has attracted102.5 billion yuan ($14.56 billion) in foreign investment, with an average annual growth rate of 14.6 percent. Additionally, trade in goods and services increased by average rates of 31.3 percent and 32.3 percent respectively, while the province’s economic openness reached 35 percent. With the formal launch of island-wide special customs operations, Hainan is well-positioned to seize new opportunities for growth and global integration.

Looking back at China’s reform and opening-up process, the use of opening up to drive reform and development has been a key factor behind the country’s continued progress and achievements.

By the end of 2024, the number of foreign-funded companies in China had grown to nearly 1.24 million, with almost 700,000 foreign trade companies engaging in import and export activities. Foreign trade and foreign investment have directly or indirectly created jobs for more than 200 million people. In November this year, China’s actual foreign direct investment jumped 26.1 percent year on year.

In today’s increasingly turbulent and complex international environment, where protectionist tendencies are on the rise, expanding opening up has become more challenging. This requires a dynamic balance between opening up and ensuring security. The key to achieving this balance lies in China’s approach to voluntary opening up.

Voluntary opening up is a defining feature of China’s high-level opening up in the new era. It is an approach driven by China’s own development needs while also fostering constructive interaction with the rest of the world. This method involves a measured, well-defined and multi-tiered approach, tailored to the specific needs of different industries and sectors. Central to voluntary opening up is the notion of initiating openness on China’s own terms, emphasizing cooperation and mutually beneficial outcomes.

Voluntary opening up is neither driven solely by reciprocity nor by external pressure. Rather, it is rooted in China’s modernization efforts and founded on principles of independence and self-reliance.

China has enacted a series of voluntary opening up policies, including the promotion of high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, the expansion of pilot free trade zones, and the establishment of platforms such as the China International Import Expo. Furthermore, China has granted zero-tariff treatment for 100 percent tariff lines to all least developed countries with which it has diplomatic relations, while steadily expanding the list of countries eligible for unilateral visa-free entry.

These efforts not only support China’s domestic development, but also bring tangible benefits to the wider world.

The level of opening up is closely linked to the depth of reform and the stage of economic development, with each reinforcing the other in a virtuous cycle. Deeper reform and higher-quality development enhance a country’s capacity to open up further, while broader opening up drives continued reform and fosters better development outcomes.

Today, China is home to the world’s largest middle-income group, offering vast market potential and growth prospects. It has a complete industrial system with more than 200 mature industrial clusters, as well as a large pool of highly skilled workers and entrepreneurs. 

These advantages provide China with substantial capacity to engage proactively with international markets and shape a favorable external environment, thereby gaining a competitive edge in economic development and international competition.

Expanding voluntary opening up serves a dual purpose: domestically, it strengthens China’s capacity to harness opening up as a driver of reform and development; internationally, it enhances China’s role in promoting global cooperation and win-win outcomes. This strategic approach benefits both China and the broader international community.

Special customs operations of Hainan FTP significant to China’s opening up

By He Yin, People’s Daily

On Dec. 18, the Hainan Free Trade Port (FTP) officially launched island-wide special customs operations, marking another historic moment in China’s reform and opening up. 

At a time when the international landscape is marked by turbulence and transformation, and protectionism is severely disrupting the global economic and trade order, a China that continues to expand high-level opening up is injecting confidence into the world and creating new opportunities, fully demonstrating a sense of vision and responsibility befitting its role in the times.

The Hainan FTP will serve as a key gateway for China’s opening up in the new era. The development of the Hainan FTP is a major reform and opening up initiative personally planned and advanced by Chinese President Xi Jinping. 

From both domestic and international perspectives, it is a major strategic decision made by the Communist Party of China Central Committee to push forward the innovation and development of socialism with Chinese characteristics. 

Following the launch of special customs operations, Hainan will implement a liberalized and facilitative policy framework characterized by “freer access at the first line, regulated access at the second line, and free flow within the island” while steadily creating conditions for the full implementation of a system featuring zero tariffs, low tax rates, and simplified tax system. 

As relevant institutions are further refined and policy dividends continue to be released, the Hainan FTP will transform its openness momentum into drivers of high-quality development, guiding China’s high-level opening up in the new era to a higher stage and injecting fresh impetus into the advancement of economic globalization. 

The Malaysian National News Agency, or Bernama, noted that as the global trade landscape undergoes profound changes, China’s efforts to build this high-standard economic zone reflect both the confidence of a major global economy and its determination to play a leading role in global economic development.

With a higher level of opening up and higher standards of reform, the Hainan FTP is generating a “Hainan experience” that is replicable and scalable for China’s broader reform and opening up. 

Since the release of the master plan for the Hainan FTP in June 2020, institutional and mechanism innovation across the fields of Hainan’s opening up has continued to advance, with an initial policy and institutional system centered on trade and investment liberalization and facilitation taking shape. 

Hainan has rolled out the country’s first negative list for cross-border trade in services, set up and upgraded the “single window” for international trade and investment, implemented the two 15-percent income tax policies for enterprises and individuals, and expanded visa-free entry to citizens of 86 countries. These reforms in capital flows, personnel exchange, transport connectivity, and orderly data flows show the Hainan FTP’s strong alignment with international rules. They represent an important practice in China’s pursuit of institutional opening up. 

To date, Hainan has cultivated 21 batches of 173 integrated institutional innovation cases. 82 of them have received national-level recognition and 37 have been promoted nationwide.

As development accelerates, the FTP is enhancing regional coordination and creating new cooperation opportunities globally, particularly with neighboring countries.

On the one hand, a growing number of Chinese enterprises are leveraging the institutional advantages of the Hainan FTP to “go global,” promoting smoother linkages between domestic and international circulation. 

Data show that in the first half of 2025 alone, Hainan enterprises added 167 overseas investment filing projects, up 103 percent year on year. 

On the other hand, initiatives like Yangpu Port’s international transshipment pilot, optimized tropical agriculture layouts, and cross-border aircraft maintenance cooperation demonstrate how institutional opening drives regional supply chain development.

Observers note that the Hainan FTP provides multinational enterprises with a stable, transparent, and predictable business environment, boosting global competitiveness while facilitating market access. This reflects growing worldwide interest in Hainan’s opportunities.

Opening up is the only path to prosperity and development, and a defining feature of Chinese modernization. The launch of special customs operations in the Hainan FTP once again sends a clear message to the world: China’s resolve to expand high-level opening up will not waver; its commitment to sharing development opportunities with the rest of the world will not waver; and its determination to advance economic globalization will not waver.

International community must remain vigilant against the resurgence of Japanese militarism

By Chang Sichun

Since the end of World War II, Japan has never fully eradicated the militarist elements that drove its wartime aggression. Recent developments indicate a resurgence of these forces, fueled by intersecting domestic and international factors.

Domestically, Japanese society has avoided a comprehensive reckoning with the ideological foundations of its imperial expansionism. Descendants and ideological inheritors of pre-war militarist figures have regained influential positions in government and politics, creating structural concerns about the revival of expansionist ideologies. 

Over subsequent decades, Japanese authorities have systematically tolerated right-wing efforts to whitewash history education. Since the mid-1950s, state-approved textbook revisions have progressively minimized, distorted, or outright denied Japan’s wartime atrocities. This institutionalized historical revisionism cultivates distorted national narratives among younger generations, creating enabling conditions for militarist revival.

Yasukuni Shrine, long a spiritual tool and symbol of Japan’s militarist aggression, has increasingly been used by Japanese politicians who visit the shrine to cater to right-wing forces and consolidate political support, turning this symbol of militarism into an instrument for personal political gain.

Since the end of the Cold War, profound changes in the international landscape and Japan’s prolonged economic stagnation — often referred to as its “lost decades” — have driven the country to seek so-called “normal country” status through breakthroughs in the political and security domains. 

Historical revisionism has continued to spread within Japan. Some politicians and right-wing forces openly deny atrocities committed by the Japanese military during World War II, including the Nanjing Massacre and the forced recruitment of “comfort women,” while persistently questioning, undermining or hollowing out the Murayama Statement and the Kono Statement. 

Japanese leaders have repeatedly staged so-called “memorial” activities overseas and vigorously promoted a narrative centered on Japan as a “victim of nuclear bombings,” attempting to dilute Japan’s responsibility as a perpetrator of aggression by reshaping its international image as a victim.

Externally, flawed historical perspectives such as “Western centrism” and the notion of Europe as the sole main battlefield of World War II have distorted global understanding of Japanese militarism. As a matter of fact, the policy of appeasement was one of the key causes of the outbreak of the war.

Following the September 18th Incident, some Western countries adopted policies of indulgence and appeasement toward Japan’s aggression in China. In the post-World War II era, Cold War mentality led Western academia largely underestimated the significance of the main Eastern battlefield and seriously overlooked China’s major contribution to the Allied victory in the World Anti-Fascist War.

During the Cold War, ideological considerations dominated international relations. In order to safeguard their vested interests in the Far East, certain countries hastily sought to turn Japan into a frontline outpost against communism, thereby prematurely ending the process of reckoning with Japanese militarism. 

A number of imprisoned Class-A war criminals received early release, while many militarists were removed from postwar purges and returned to political and business circles, occupying key positions. 

For example, Class-A war criminals Mamoru Shigemitsu and Okinori Kaya later served as Japan’s deputy prime minister and foreign minister, and justice minister, respectively. 

These facts demonstrate that the “poisonous seed” of militarism was not eradicated in postwar Japan; instead, it quietly took root and grew under the protection of right-wing forces that had escaped accountability.

More recently, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has recklessly claimed that a “Taiwan contingency” could constitute a “survival-threatening situation,” justifying Japan’s exercise of the right to collective self-defense, openly challenging the postwar international order. 

It is widely recognized that Japanese militarists repeatedly used the so-called “survival-threatening situation” as a pretext to launch wars of aggression in the past. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, yet the specter of militarism still looms over Japan. 

Takaichi’s irresponsible remarks on Taiwan fully exposed the lingering presence of Japanese militarist thinking and its unrepentant coveting of Taiwan. Such actions directly challenge China’s core interests, seriously undermine regional peace and stability, and pose hidden dangers to world peace. The international community must work together to resolutely oppose and contain this trend.

(Chang Sichun is the deputy director of the office of diplomatic studies of the Institute of Japanese Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.)

Hunan free trade zone introduces a new model for goods clearance

By Wang Donghui, Luo Shanshan, People’s Daily

In the Yueyang area of the China (Hunan) Pilot Free Trade Zone (Hunan pilot FTZ) in central China’s Hunan province, cargo trucks are lined up to enter the comprehensive bonded zone. Driver Gan Baowang smoothly navigated his truck toward the checkpoint, passing through within moments.

To address challenges such as cumbersome declaration processes, prolonged waiting time, and inefficient procedures for goods and personnel entering and exiting the bonded zone, the Yueyang area of the Hunan FTZ has implemented a new, streamlined management model.

“When goods move into the comprehensive bonded zone, if issues such as discrepancies in vehicle information arise, the backend system immediately sends alerts to enterprises, while staff direct vehicles to designated inspection areas for rapid handling,” explained Chen Yu, director of the innovation and coordination department of the administrative committee of the Yueyang area. 

“As a result, the time spent at checkpoints has been reduced from 30 to 50 minutes to approximately 40 seconds,” said Chen.

This advancement in trade facilitation serves as a prime example of how the Hunan pilot FTZ is building itself into an inland hub for reform and opening up through institutional innovation. Since its inception five years ago, the FTZ has actively explored new paths in industrial development and opening up, yielding significant achievements.

Over the past five years, the Hunan pilot FTZ has seen the establishment of 54,700 new enterprises, attracted 575 major projects with a total investment of 767.37 billion yuan ($108.95 billion), and generated 109 institutional innovation outcomes, seven of which have been promoted nationwide.

The FTZ, comprising three areas, leverages their respective advantages and pursues differentiated development priorities, according to Hu Songqiang, an official with the Hunan provincial department of commerce.

Through domestic reform and international collaboration, the Hunan pilot FTZ has leveraged its strengths in fostering cooperation with Africa to advance China-Africa economic and trade relations.

Platforms such as the China-Africa Economic and Trade Expo and the Pilot Zone for In-depth China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation have yielded substantial progress in this regard.  At the Gaoqiao Grand Market in the Changsha area of the FTZ, a diverse range of African goods, including South African wine, are displayed. Additionally, the Chenzhou area has launched four air routes to Africa, while the cargo value transported via the Hunan-Guangdong-Africa rail-sea intermodal transport service has exceeded $500 million. Yueyang has also become home to the headquarters of the Pilot Zone for In-depth China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation, expanding investment in the primary processing of African agricultural products.

“As trade exchanges continue to strengthen, we are committed to providing better services for Hunan enterprises seeking to expand globally,” said Deng You, deputy director of the Yuhua administrative committee in the Changsha area of the Hunan pilot FTZ. He noted that the Changsha area has promoted the establishment of the China-Africa Technical Measures to Trade Research and Evaluation Base, which aids enterprises in penetrating new markets.

“The base provides professional training and personalized consulting, enabling enterprises to gain a comprehensive understanding of market access standards and policy procedures in target countries,” a representative of the base explained.

Since its establishment, the base has been guided by Changsha customs in conducting 430 evaluations of technical trade measures. Of these, 120 evaluation opinions have been adopted by the Research Center for International Inspection and Quarantine Standards and Technical Regulations under the General Administration of Customs of China, with six receiving formal responses from notified countries. These evaluations cover products with annual exports to Africa valued at over 2.9 billion yuan.

So far, 14 cities and prefectures in Hunan have established paired cooperation mechanisms with 28 African countries. According to Changsha customs, trade between Hunan and Africa grew at an average annual rate of 14.3 percent from 2021 to 2024, ranking first among central and western regions of China. In the first 11 months of this year, Hunan’s imports and exports with Africa reached 53.99 billion yuan.

International community should stay alert to Japan’s ‘deceptive diplomacy’

By Zhong Sheng, People’s Daily

At a time when Japan’s Takaichi administration has stirred up trouble over the Taiwan question and driven itself into a diplomatic cul-de-sac, Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi has been loudly hyping up the so-called “radar illumination” incident. 

Koizumi first falsely claimed that Japan had received no notification from the Chinese side; after China released audio recordings of the relevant communication, he adjusted his stance, asserting that the information provided by China was “insufficient.” 

Reports indicate that the Secretary General of Japan’s National Security Secretariat has also recently contacted officials from the UK, France, Germany, Canada and other countries, scrambling to justify and lobby for Takaichi’s remarks concerning Taiwan. 

He claimed that Takaichi’s statements at the Diet meeting did not alter Japan’s long-standing position on Taiwan and that China’s criticism of Japan was “inconsistent with the facts.”

The series of maneuvers by Japanese politicians once again fully exposed their habitual dishonesty. They are adept at turning black into white, distorting the truth, and engaging in deceptive diplomacy, attempting to feign innocence and win sympathy on the international stage.

When a country consistently builds its policies on falsehoods, what does this mean for regional and global stability? History offers sobering insights.

“In all my fifty years of public service I have never seen a document that was more crowded with infamous falsehoods and distortions on a scale so huge that I never imagined until today that any government on this planet was capable of uttering them.” These words were spoken by former U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull. 

After deciding to go to war against the United States in 1941, Japan secretly prepared for hostilities while continuing to dispatch so-called “peace envoys” to Washington, striking a pose of pursuing negotiations. 

In the process, Japan deliberately sought to make greater use of Japanese Ambassador to the United States Kichisaburo Nomura, who had long been acquainted with then U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. 

After Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Hull received Japan’s note announcing the “termination of negotiations” and, in a state of profound indignation, uttered the words quoted above. 

In his subsequent address to Congress requesting a declaration of war against Japan, Roosevelt also made a point of telling the American people that the United States had been at peace with Japan and, at Japan’s request, was still engaged in dialogue with the Japanese government in the hope of preserving peace in the Pacific.

“Our deceptive diplomacy is steadily heading toward success.” Postwar studies by Japanese scholars later revealed that Japan had smugly written such words in its war diaries. 

Prior to the Pearl Harbor incident, Isoroku Yamamoto, one of the chief architects of the attack, clearly understood that only by successfully carrying out a deception could a surprise strike stand a chance. The utter unpreparedness of the United States was precisely the outcome Japan’s militarists sought through the painstaking fabrication of lies.

The despicable deception of Japanese militarism inflicted deep wounds on American society. After the war broke out, U.S. media uniformly used the word “betrayal” in headlines and editorials. The New York Times defined Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor as a “treacherous betrayal,” while the Chicago Tribune ran an editorial saying that Japan’s treachery united the American people. 

In his fireside chats, Roosevelt emphasized that not only must the stain of Japan’s treachery be wiped away, but the very roots of international aggression must be completely severed. Even after the war, Hull continued to express deep revulsion in his memoirs toward Japan’s “cunning and hypocrisy.”

Whenever Japan weaves lies, it does so with sinister intent. Today, Japan’s deceptive diplomacy is once again baring its fangs. On issues bearing on its own strategic direction, Japan repeatedly spreads falsehoods for the same reason — because it harbors ulterior motives. 

Whether it is deliberately hyping the so-called “China threat” or using cooperation with U.S. forces as a pretext to lift the ban on collective self-defense, the real aim of Japan’s right wing is to break free from the constraints of the postwar international order and domestic law and to once again pursue military expansion.

Japan’s right wing is a habitual fabricator of “false narratives.” The international community must remain highly vigilant toward its strategic opportunism and adventurism. After all, Japan has never completed a proper reckoning with its war crimes of the past, and Japan’s right wing has never truly accepted its defeat 80 years ago. 

Those with insight would do well to take a closer look at the words and deeds of Japanese right-wing politicians in recent years: claiming at Pearl Harbor commemorations that “both sides were perpetrators and victims”; asserting that the Pearl Harbor incident was a “deliberate framing” by the United States and that Japan’s actions were a “forced counterattack”; laying wreaths at monuments to Japanese war dead in Papua New Guinea.

The facts show that a Japan that refuses to accept its defeat is not only reversing course in its understanding of history, but is also repeatedly crossing red lines and provoking confrontation in reality.

The ebb and flow of the Pacific tides cannot wash away the monstrous crimes of Japanese militarism. Any appeasement or indulgence will only embolden historical revisionists. 

The international community should draw lessons from history, see clearly Japan’s malicious strategic intentions, take a long-term view, and guard against the resurgence of Japanese militarism, lest it once again wreak subversive damage on the international order.

(Zhong Sheng is a pen name often used by People’s Daily to express its views on foreign policy and international affairs.)