NSCDC PANEL FINDINGS: ACSGN QUESTIONS THE SCOPE AND BASIS OF RECOMMENDATIONS, CALLS FOR FAIRNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY

28th October,2026

The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN) has taken note of the recently submitted report of the Federal Government’s investigative panel, chaired by Mr. Jonathan Kure, alongside various reports circulating on social media concerning the deaths of 33 illegal miners in Minna, Niger State, on September 16 and 17, 2026.
The unfortunate incident, which reportedly resulted in the deaths of 33 detainees, has raised serious concerns about detention conditions, operational procedures, the protection of human rights and accountability within the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and other sister agencies. According to reports on the panel’s findings, the deaths were attributed to factors including overcrowding, extreme heat, dehydration and inadequate detention conditions.
The Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, reportedly received the panel’s report and pledged to implement its recommendations to ensure justice for the victims and their families.
Among the reported recommendations are the payment of ₦1.4 billion in compensation to the families of the 33 deceased miners and 44 survivors, as well as the summary dismissal of the former Niger State Commandant of the NSCDC, Suberu Siyaka Aniviye, and other officers found to have been directly involved in the detention and eventual deaths of the miners.
While the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN), recognises the importance of accountability, justice and institutional discipline, we believe that the implementation of the panel’s recommendations must be guided by fairness, established administrative procedures, due process and a clear understanding of the responsibilities of the officers concerned.

THE COMMANDANT-GENERAL’S LEADERSHIP AND TRANSFORMATIONAL STRIDES
As an organisation committed to accountability, transparency, justice and good governance in public service, ACSGN wishes to state that the Commandant-General of the NSCDC, Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi, has made significant contributions to the repositioning, rebranding and institutional development of the Corps since assuming office.
His leadership has been associated with efforts to strengthen professionalism, improve personnel development, enhance operational capacity, promote discipline and raise the morale of officers and men of the Corps. These efforts, in our assessment, deserve objective recognition and should be considered fairly in any evaluation of the organisation’s overall performance.
The development of infrastructure, improvements in personnel capacity and the promotion of institutional discipline are important elements of effective leadership. They should neither be ignored nor dismissed because of an unfortunate incident involving officers operating at a particular command.
We emphasise, however, that recognising the achievements of the national leadership does not diminish the gravity of the deaths in Niger State. The lives lost demand a thorough investigation, appropriate accountability for those found culpable and effective measures to prevent a recurrence but we are not unmindful of the activities of fifth columnists and spentforces who are working clandestinely to use the panel’s report to thwart the leadership efforts of the organisation and paint management in bad light for the fact that they have an axe to grind.

In a press statement jointly signed by the National Convener of ACSGN, Comrade Wale Adegoke, and its Secretary, Comrade Musa Abdullahi, the group expressed concern over the reported recommendation for institutional reforms aimed at strengthening the leadership of the NSCDC.
According to the information available to the group, the panel reportedly recommended institutional reforms within the Corps. We believe that any such recommendation must be examined carefully within the context of the panel’s actual findings, the evidence presented and the specific shortcomings identified during the investigation.
Institutional reforms are not inherently objectionable. Indeed, every responsible organisation must continually review its procedures, address weaknesses and improve its operational standards. However, reforms should be based on demonstrable institutional deficiencies and clearly articulated objectives, rather than being interpreted as an automatic indictment of the national leadership or a means to cast aspersions on the leadership because of its performance. ” You cannot pass or transfer an individual mess to his boss just to hang him”. It is unacceptable in today’s world and very unethical practice globally.

DELEGATED AUTHORITY AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
Our principal concern is the need to distinguish clearly between the overall supervisory responsibilities of the Commandant-General and the operational responsibilities exercised by a State Commandant under delegated authority.
The Commandant-General oversees the NSCDC nationally, providing strategic direction, institutional supervision and policy leadership. At the state level, however, the State Commandant is responsible for managing the command’s operations within the framework of applicable laws, regulations, directives and delegated powers.
This distinction is fundamental to any fair assessment of administrative and operational responsibility. Where an incident arises from decisions, omissions or actions taken at the state level, the investigation must establish who authorised the operation, who exercised direct control, which procedures were followed or violated, and whether any failure of supervision or institutional oversight contributed to the outcome.
It would therefore be inappropriate to assume that the Commandant-General bears direct personal responsibility for every operational failure occurring within a state command merely because he heads the organisation nationally.
At the same time, we must take into account the apology given by the state commandant of wrong doing and professional oversight. Accountability must follow the evidence and the actual responsibilities of the individuals and offices concerned.
This is the standard of fairness that ACSGN believes should guide the interpretation and implementation of the panel’s recommendations.

THE PANEL’S REPORTED FINDINGS AND THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CONCLUSIONS
Of particular importance is the reported finding that the operation leading to the arrest and detention of the miners was conducted without an operational order or approval from the NSCDC national headquarters as stated by the panel’s report.
This finding raises an important question about the chain of command, the authorisation of the operation and the extent to which decisions were taken independently at the state level.
It is therefore necessary to examine the precise wording of the report and determine what conclusions can reasonably be drawn from that finding. The absence of an operational order or approval from the national headquarters may be relevant to establishing where the operation originated and who exercised direct operational control. However, the panel has exonerated the national headquarters by the admission in the report that there was no direct communication or procedural directive nor authorisation.
Accordingly, ACSGN urges the relevant authorities and the public to distinguish between the panel’s established findings, its recommendations and the interpretations subsequently placed on them by interested parties.
If the panel identified specific officers as directly responsible for violations, the appropriate disciplinary measures should be pursued in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
What must be avoided is the indiscriminate attribution of blame or the drawing of conclusions that go beyond the evidence contained in the report such as, it is clandestinely syndicated by fifth columnists in the social media platforms by changing the facts of the issue in trying to cast aspersions on the hard- earned reputation of the CG who oversees the entire organisation.
The group also notes and reports that the former Niger State Commandant apologised over the incident and acknowledged shortcomings under his watch. Any such admission should be considered alongside the full findings of the investigation, rather than treated as a substitute for a comprehensive determination of individual and institutional responsibility.
An apology may be relevant to an inquiry, but the final determination of culpability must rest on established facts, applicable rules and due process just as stated in this issue and nothing more.

NO ROOM FOR SCAPEGOATING, SELECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY OR PREJUDGMENT
ACSGN is concerned that the panel’s recommendations and their subsequent interpretation could become the subject of political or institutional controversy, with the potential to shift attention away from the central issues of justice for the deceased, support for the survivors and the prevention of future tragedies.
We caution against any attempt to use the unfortunate deaths of the miners as a basis for an unjustified campaign against the Commandant-General or the national management of the NSCDC. Equally, we reject any attempt to shield officers who may have acted negligently, unlawfully or in violation of established procedures.
The appropriate response is neither indiscriminate condemnation nor unconditional exoneration. It is a fair, evidence-based assessment of the conduct of every officer and institution whose actions or omissions may have contributed to the tragedy.
Where responsibility is established, accountability must follow. Where allegations are unsupported, reputations must not be damaged through speculation, misinformation or the selective presentation of findings.
The group therefore calls on all stakeholders to refrain from using inflammatory narratives to prejudge the outcome of the investigation or to undermine public confidence in the NSCDC without a proper examination of the evidence.

RECOGNISING PERFORMANCE WHILE DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY
The group further observes that Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi has reportedly been reappointed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for another four-year term. We believe that the continuation of his tenure should be assessed on the basis of institutional performance, measurable reforms, operational effectiveness and the Corps’ ability to fulfil its statutory responsibilities.
A single incident, however serious, should not automatically erase an institution’s achievements. Equally,
the appropriate approach is to preserve what has worked, correct what has failed and strengthen the safeguards necessary to protect lives, uphold human rights and ensure professional conduct.
We urge the Commandant-General and the management of the NSCDC to remain committed to strengthening internal accountability, improving detention standards, enforcing operational procedures and ensuring that all personnel understand the limits and responsibilities of their delegated authority.
These measures would reinforce public confidence in the Corps and demonstrate that institutional reform and responsible leadership can proceed together.

OUR CALL TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE NSCDC LEADERSHIP
The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria call on the Minister of Interior, the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Commandant-General of the NSCDC to ensure that the panel’s recommendations are implemented fairly, transparently and in accordance with the law.
We further urge the relevant authorities to:
Publish or make available the relevant findings: Ensure that the panel’s conclusions and recommendations are communicated accurately, so that the public can distinguish established facts from speculation and partisan interpretations.
Establish individual and institutional responsibility: Clearly identify the respective roles of the officers involved, the state command and the
uphold due process: Ensure that disciplinary measures are proportionate to the findings and implemented in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
Provide justice for the victims and survivors: Pursue the recommended compensation through transparent and lawful procedures, while ensuring that the families of the deceased and the survivors receive the support to which they are entitled.
Strengthen operational safeguards: Review procedures governing arrests, detention, supervision and the welfare of detainees to prevent a recurrence of such a tragic incident.
Protect institutional integrity: Ensure that accountability is not converted into an instrument for personal vendettas, political pressure or the unjustified discrediting of any public officer.
Promote professional standards: Sustain reforms aimed at improving personnel training, discipline, operational efficiency and the protection of lives and property throughout the country.
The NSCDC remains an important national institution with responsibilities that include protecting critical national assets and infrastructure, supporting internal security and contributing to the preservation of public order. Its capacity to discharge these duties effectively is in the public interest.
We therefore encourage the Corps’ leadership to remain focused on its statutory responsibilities while treating the Niger State incident with the seriousness it deserves.

VOTE OF CONFIDENCE IN THE NATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF THE NSCDC
In view of the foregoing, the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria hereby express its confidence in the national management of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps under the leadership of Commandant-General Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi.
Our position is based on our assessment of the national leadership’s institutional development efforts and our conviction that the Niger State incident must be addressed through a fair and evidence-based process that distinguishes individual operational responsibility from wider institutional oversight.
This vote of confidence is not a rejection of accountability, nor does it diminish the suffering of the victims and their families. Rather, it reflects our belief that justice must be pursued without prejudice, that responsibility must be established through evidence, and that the integrity of a national institution must be protected through transparency, professionalism and continuous improvement.
We urge the Federal Government, the NSCDC leadership and all stakeholders to ensure that the tragedy in Niger State becomes an opportunity to strengthen institutional safeguards, improve operational accountability and restore public confidence.

28th October,2026.

PRESS RELEASE

NSCDC PANEL FINDINGS: ACSGN QUESTIONS THE SCOPE AND BASIS OF RECOMMENDATIONS, CALLS FOR FAIRNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY

The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN) has taken note of the recently submitted report of the Federal Government’s investigative panel, chaired by Mr. Jonathan Kure, alongside various reports circulating on social media concerning the deaths of 33 illegal miners in Minna, Niger State, on September 16 and 17, 2026.
The unfortunate incident, which reportedly resulted in the deaths of 33 detainees, has raised serious concerns about detention conditions, operational procedures, the protection of human rights and accountability within the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and other sister agencies. According to reports on the panel’s findings, the deaths were attributed to factors including overcrowding, extreme heat, dehydration and inadequate detention conditions.
The Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, reportedly received the panel’s report and pledged to implement its recommendations to ensure justice for the victims and their families.
Among the reported recommendations are the payment of ₦1.4 billion in compensation to the families of the 33 deceased miners and 44 survivors, as well as the summary dismissal of the former Niger State Commandant of the NSCDC, Suberu Siyaka Aniviye, and other officers found to have been directly involved in the detention and eventual deaths of the miners.
While the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN), recognises the importance of accountability, justice and institutional discipline, we believe that the implementation of the panel’s recommendations must be guided by fairness, established administrative procedures, due process and a clear understanding of the responsibilities of the officers concerned.

THE COMMANDANT-GENERAL’S LEADERSHIP AND TRANSFORMATIONAL STRIDES
As an organisation committed to accountability, transparency, justice and good governance in public service, ACSGN wishes to state that the Commandant-General of the NSCDC, Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi, has made significant contributions to the repositioning, rebranding and institutional development of the Corps since assuming office.
His leadership has been associated with efforts to strengthen professionalism, improve personnel development, enhance operational capacity, promote discipline and raise the morale of officers and men of the Corps. These efforts, in our assessment, deserve objective recognition and should be considered fairly in any evaluation of the organisation’s overall performance.
The development of infrastructure, improvements in personnel capacity and the promotion of institutional discipline are important elements of effective leadership. They should neither be ignored nor dismissed because of an unfortunate incident involving officers operating at a particular command.
We emphasise, however, that recognising the achievements of the national leadership does not diminish the gravity of the deaths in Niger State. The lives lost demand a thorough investigation, appropriate accountability for those found culpable and effective measures to prevent a recurrence but we are not unmindful of the activities of fifth columnists and spentforces who are working clandestinely to use the panel’s report to thwart the leadership efforts of the organisation and paint management in bad light for the fact that they have an axe to grind.

In a press statement jointly signed by the National Convener of ACSGN, Comrade Wale Adegoke, and its Secretary, Comrade Musa Abdullahi, the group expressed concern over the reported recommendation for institutional reforms aimed at strengthening the leadership of the NSCDC.
According to the information available to the group, the panel reportedly recommended institutional reforms within the Corps. We believe that any such recommendation must be examined carefully within the context of the panel’s actual findings, the evidence presented and the specific shortcomings identified during the investigation.
Institutional reforms are not inherently objectionable. Indeed, every responsible organisation must continually review its procedures, address weaknesses and improve its operational standards. However, reforms should be based on demonstrable institutional deficiencies and clearly articulated objectives, rather than being interpreted as an automatic indictment of the national leadership or a means to cast aspersions on the leadership because of its performance. ” You cannot pass or transfer an individual mess to his boss just to hang him”. It is unacceptable in today’s world and very unethical practice globally.

DELEGATED AUTHORITY AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
Our principal concern is the need to distinguish clearly between the overall supervisory responsibilities of the Commandant-General and the operational responsibilities exercised by a State Commandant under delegated authority.
The Commandant-General oversees the NSCDC nationally, providing strategic direction, institutional supervision and policy leadership. At the state level, however, the State Commandant is responsible for managing the command’s operations within the framework of applicable laws, regulations, directives and delegated powers.
This distinction is fundamental to any fair assessment of administrative and operational responsibility. Where an incident arises from decisions, omissions or actions taken at the state level, the investigation must establish who authorised the operation, who exercised direct control, which procedures were followed or violated, and whether any failure of supervision or institutional oversight contributed to the outcome.
It would therefore be inappropriate to assume that the Commandant-General bears direct personal responsibility for every operational failure occurring within a state command merely because he heads the organisation nationally.
At the same time, we must take into account the apology given by the state commandant of wrong doing and professional oversight. Accountability must follow the evidence and the actual responsibilities of the individuals and offices concerned.
This is the standard of fairness that ACSGN believes should guide the interpretation and implementation of the panel’s recommendations.

THE PANEL’S REPORTED FINDINGS AND THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CONCLUSIONS
Of particular importance is the reported finding that the operation leading to the arrest and detention of the miners was conducted without an operational order or approval from the NSCDC national headquarters as stated by the panel’s report.
This finding raises an important question about the chain of command, the authorisation of the operation and the extent to which decisions were taken independently at the state level.
It is therefore necessary to examine the precise wording of the report and determine what conclusions can reasonably be drawn from that finding. The absence of an operational order or approval from the national headquarters may be relevant to establishing where the operation originated and who exercised direct operational control. However, the panel has exonerated the national headquarters by the admission in the report that there was no direct communication or procedural directive nor authorisation.
Accordingly, ACSGN urges the relevant authorities and the public to distinguish between the panel’s established findings, its recommendations and the interpretations subsequently placed on them by interested parties.
If the panel identified specific officers as directly responsible for violations, the appropriate disciplinary measures should be pursued in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
What must be avoided is the indiscriminate attribution of blame or the drawing of conclusions that go beyond the evidence contained in the report such as, it is clandestinely syndicated by fifth columnists in the social media platforms by changing the facts of the issue in trying to cast aspersions on the hard- earned reputation of the CG who oversees the entire organisation.
The group also notes and reports that the former Niger State Commandant apologised over the incident and acknowledged shortcomings under his watch. Any such admission should be considered alongside the full findings of the investigation, rather than treated as a substitute for a comprehensive determination of individual and institutional responsibility.
An apology may be relevant to an inquiry, but the final determination of culpability must rest on established facts, applicable rules and due process just as stated in this issue and nothing more.

NO ROOM FOR SCAPEGOATING, SELECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY OR PREJUDGMENT
ACSGN is concerned that the panel’s recommendations and their subsequent interpretation could become the subject of political or institutional controversy, with the potential to shift attention away from the central issues of justice for the deceased, support for the survivors and the prevention of future tragedies.
We caution against any attempt to use the unfortunate deaths of the miners as a basis for an unjustified campaign against the Commandant-General or the national management of the NSCDC. Equally, we reject any attempt to shield officers who may have acted negligently, unlawfully or in violation of established procedures.
The appropriate response is neither indiscriminate condemnation nor unconditional exoneration. It is a fair, evidence-based assessment of the conduct of every officer and institution whose actions or omissions may have contributed to the tragedy.
Where responsibility is established, accountability must follow. Where allegations are unsupported, reputations must not be damaged through speculation, misinformation or the selective presentation of findings.
The group therefore calls on all stakeholders to refrain from using inflammatory narratives to prejudge the outcome of the investigation or to undermine public confidence in the NSCDC without a proper examination of the evidence.

RECOGNISING PERFORMANCE WHILE DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY
The group further observes that Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi has reportedly been reappointed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for another four-year term. We believe that the continuation of his tenure should be assessed on the basis of institutional performance, measurable reforms, operational effectiveness and the Corps’ ability to fulfil its statutory responsibilities.
A single incident, however serious, should not automatically erase an institution’s achievements. Equally,
the appropriate approach is to preserve what has worked, correct what has failed and strengthen the safeguards necessary to protect lives, uphold human rights and ensure professional conduct.
We urge the Commandant-General and the management of the NSCDC to remain committed to strengthening internal accountability, improving detention standards, enforcing operational procedures and ensuring that all personnel understand the limits and responsibilities of their delegated authority.
These measures would reinforce public confidence in the Corps and demonstrate that institutional reform and responsible leadership can proceed together.

OUR CALL TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE NSCDC LEADERSHIP
The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria call on the Minister of Interior, the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Commandant-General of the NSCDC to ensure that the panel’s recommendations are implemented fairly, transparently and in accordance with the law.
We further urge the relevant authorities to:
Publish or make available the relevant findings: Ensure that the panel’s conclusions and recommendations are communicated accurately, so that the public can distinguish established facts from speculation and partisan interpretations.
Establish individual and institutional responsibility: Clearly identify the respective roles of the officers involved, the state command and the
uphold due process: Ensure that disciplinary measures are proportionate to the findings and implemented in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
Provide justice for the victims and survivors: Pursue the recommended compensation through transparent and lawful procedures, while ensuring that the families of the deceased and the survivors receive the support to which they are entitled.
Strengthen operational safeguards: Review procedures governing arrests, detention, supervision and the welfare of detainees to prevent a recurrence of such a tragic incident.
Protect institutional integrity: Ensure that accountability is not converted into an instrument for personal vendettas, political pressure or the unjustified discrediting of any public officer.
Promote professional standards: Sustain reforms aimed at improving personnel training, discipline, operational efficiency and the protection of lives and property throughout the country.
The NSCDC remains an important national institution with responsibilities that include protecting critical national assets and infrastructure, supporting internal security and contributing to the preservation of public order. Its capacity to discharge these duties effectively is in the public interest.
We therefore encourage the Corps’ leadership to remain focused on its statutory responsibilities while treating the Niger State incident with the seriousness it deserves.

VOTE OF CONFIDENCE IN THE NATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF THE NSCDC
In view of the foregoing, the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria hereby express its confidence in the national management of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps under the leadership of Commandant-General Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi.
Our position is based on our assessment of the national leadership’s institutional development efforts and our conviction that the Niger State incident must be addressed through a fair and evidence-based process that distinguishes individual operational responsibility from wider institutional oversight.
This vote of confidence is not a rejection of accountability, nor does it diminish the suffering of the victims and their families. Rather, it reflects our belief that justice must be pursued without prejudice, that responsibility must be established through evidence, and that the integrity of a national institution must be protected through transparency, professionalism and continuous improvement.
We urge the Federal Government, the NSCDC leadership and all stakeholders to ensure that the tragedy in Niger State becomes an opportunity to strengthen institutional safeguards, improve operational accountability and restore public confidence.

NSCDC PANEL FINDINGS: ACSGN QUESTIONS THE SCOPE AND BASIS OF RECOMMENDATIONS, CALLS FOR FAIRNESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY

28th October,2026

The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN) has taken note of the recently submitted report of the Federal Government’s investigative panel, chaired by Mr. Jonathan Kure, alongside various reports circulating on social media concerning the deaths of 33 illegal miners in Minna, Niger State, on September 16 and 17, 2026.
The unfortunate incident, which reportedly resulted in the deaths of 33 detainees, has raised serious concerns about detention conditions, operational procedures, the protection of human rights and accountability within the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) and other sister agencies. According to reports on the panel’s findings, the deaths were attributed to factors including overcrowding, extreme heat, dehydration and inadequate detention conditions.
The Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, reportedly received the panel’s report and pledged to implement its recommendations to ensure justice for the victims and their families.
Among the reported recommendations are the payment of ₦1.4 billion in compensation to the families of the 33 deceased miners and 44 survivors, as well as the summary dismissal of the former Niger State Commandant of the NSCDC, Suberu Siyaka Aniviye, and other officers found to have been directly involved in the detention and eventual deaths of the miners.
While the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria (ACSGN), recognises the importance of accountability, justice and institutional discipline, we believe that the implementation of the panel’s recommendations must be guided by fairness, established administrative procedures, due process and a clear understanding of the responsibilities of the officers concerned.

THE COMMANDANT-GENERAL’S LEADERSHIP AND TRANSFORMATIONAL STRIDES
As an organisation committed to accountability, transparency, justice and good governance in public service, ACSGN wishes to state that the Commandant-General of the NSCDC, Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi, has made significant contributions to the repositioning, rebranding and institutional development of the Corps since assuming office.
His leadership has been associated with efforts to strengthen professionalism, improve personnel development, enhance operational capacity, promote discipline and raise the morale of officers and men of the Corps. These efforts, in our assessment, deserve objective recognition and should be considered fairly in any evaluation of the organisation’s overall performance.
The development of infrastructure, improvements in personnel capacity and the promotion of institutional discipline are important elements of effective leadership. They should neither be ignored nor dismissed because of an unfortunate incident involving officers operating at a particular command.
We emphasise, however, that recognising the achievements of the national leadership does not diminish the gravity of the deaths in Niger State. The lives lost demand a thorough investigation, appropriate accountability for those found culpable and effective measures to prevent a recurrence but we are not unmindful of the activities of fifth columnists and spentforces who are working clandestinely to use the panel’s report to thwart the leadership efforts of the organisation and paint management in bad light for the fact that they have an axe to grind.

In a press statement jointly signed by the National Convener of ACSGN, Comrade Wale Adegoke, and its Secretary, Comrade Musa Abdullahi, the group expressed concern over the reported recommendation for institutional reforms aimed at strengthening the leadership of the NSCDC.
According to the information available to the group, the panel reportedly recommended institutional reforms within the Corps. We believe that any such recommendation must be examined carefully within the context of the panel’s actual findings, the evidence presented and the specific shortcomings identified during the investigation.
Institutional reforms are not inherently objectionable. Indeed, every responsible organisation must continually review its procedures, address weaknesses and improve its operational standards. However, reforms should be based on demonstrable institutional deficiencies and clearly articulated objectives, rather than being interpreted as an automatic indictment of the national leadership or a means to cast aspersions on the leadership because of its performance. ” You cannot pass or transfer an individual mess to his boss just to hang him”. It is unacceptable in today’s world and very unethical practice globally.

DELEGATED AUTHORITY AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
Our principal concern is the need to distinguish clearly between the overall supervisory responsibilities of the Commandant-General and the operational responsibilities exercised by a State Commandant under delegated authority.
The Commandant-General oversees the NSCDC nationally, providing strategic direction, institutional supervision and policy leadership. At the state level, however, the State Commandant is responsible for managing the command’s operations within the framework of applicable laws, regulations, directives and delegated powers.
This distinction is fundamental to any fair assessment of administrative and operational responsibility. Where an incident arises from decisions, omissions or actions taken at the state level, the investigation must establish who authorised the operation, who exercised direct control, which procedures were followed or violated, and whether any failure of supervision or institutional oversight contributed to the outcome.
It would therefore be inappropriate to assume that the Commandant-General bears direct personal responsibility for every operational failure occurring within a state command merely because he heads the organisation nationally.
At the same time, we must take into account the apology given by the state commandant of wrong doing and professional oversight. Accountability must follow the evidence and the actual responsibilities of the individuals and offices concerned.
This is the standard of fairness that ACSGN believes should guide the interpretation and implementation of the panel’s recommendations.

THE PANEL’S REPORTED FINDINGS AND THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CONCLUSIONS
Of particular importance is the reported finding that the operation leading to the arrest and detention of the miners was conducted without an operational order or approval from the NSCDC national headquarters as stated by the panel’s report.
This finding raises an important question about the chain of command, the authorisation of the operation and the extent to which decisions were taken independently at the state level.
It is therefore necessary to examine the precise wording of the report and determine what conclusions can reasonably be drawn from that finding. The absence of an operational order or approval from the national headquarters may be relevant to establishing where the operation originated and who exercised direct operational control. However, the panel has exonerated the national headquarters by the admission in the report that there was no direct communication or procedural directive nor authorisation.
Accordingly, ACSGN urges the relevant authorities and the public to distinguish between the panel’s established findings, its recommendations and the interpretations subsequently placed on them by interested parties.
If the panel identified specific officers as directly responsible for violations, the appropriate disciplinary measures should be pursued in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
What must be avoided is the indiscriminate attribution of blame or the drawing of conclusions that go beyond the evidence contained in the report such as, it is clandestinely syndicated by fifth columnists in the social media platforms by changing the facts of the issue in trying to cast aspersions on the hard- earned reputation of the CG who oversees the entire organisation.
The group also notes and reports that the former Niger State Commandant apologised over the incident and acknowledged shortcomings under his watch. Any such admission should be considered alongside the full findings of the investigation, rather than treated as a substitute for a comprehensive determination of individual and institutional responsibility.
An apology may be relevant to an inquiry, but the final determination of culpability must rest on established facts, applicable rules and due process just as stated in this issue and nothing more.

NO ROOM FOR SCAPEGOATING, SELECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY OR PREJUDGMENT
ACSGN is concerned that the panel’s recommendations and their subsequent interpretation could become the subject of political or institutional controversy, with the potential to shift attention away from the central issues of justice for the deceased, support for the survivors and the prevention of future tragedies.
We caution against any attempt to use the unfortunate deaths of the miners as a basis for an unjustified campaign against the Commandant-General or the national management of the NSCDC. Equally, we reject any attempt to shield officers who may have acted negligently, unlawfully or in violation of established procedures.
The appropriate response is neither indiscriminate condemnation nor unconditional exoneration. It is a fair, evidence-based assessment of the conduct of every officer and institution whose actions or omissions may have contributed to the tragedy.
Where responsibility is established, accountability must follow. Where allegations are unsupported, reputations must not be damaged through speculation, misinformation or the selective presentation of findings.
The group therefore calls on all stakeholders to refrain from using inflammatory narratives to prejudge the outcome of the investigation or to undermine public confidence in the NSCDC without a proper examination of the evidence.

RECOGNISING PERFORMANCE WHILE DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY
The group further observes that Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi has reportedly been reappointed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for another four-year term. We believe that the continuation of his tenure should be assessed on the basis of institutional performance, measurable reforms, operational effectiveness and the Corps’ ability to fulfil its statutory responsibilities.
A single incident, however serious, should not automatically erase an institution’s achievements. Equally,
the appropriate approach is to preserve what has worked, correct what has failed and strengthen the safeguards necessary to protect lives, uphold human rights and ensure professional conduct.
We urge the Commandant-General and the management of the NSCDC to remain committed to strengthening internal accountability, improving detention standards, enforcing operational procedures and ensuring that all personnel understand the limits and responsibilities of their delegated authority.
These measures would reinforce public confidence in the Corps and demonstrate that institutional reform and responsible leadership can proceed together.

OUR CALL TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE NSCDC LEADERSHIP
The Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria call on the Minister of Interior, the Minister of Solid Minerals Development and the Commandant-General of the NSCDC to ensure that the panel’s recommendations are implemented fairly, transparently and in accordance with the law.
We further urge the relevant authorities to:
Publish or make available the relevant findings: Ensure that the panel’s conclusions and recommendations are communicated accurately, so that the public can distinguish established facts from speculation and partisan interpretations.
Establish individual and institutional responsibility: Clearly identify the respective roles of the officers involved, the state command and the
uphold due process: Ensure that disciplinary measures are proportionate to the findings and implemented in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.
Provide justice for the victims and survivors: Pursue the recommended compensation through transparent and lawful procedures, while ensuring that the families of the deceased and the survivors receive the support to which they are entitled.
Strengthen operational safeguards: Review procedures governing arrests, detention, supervision and the welfare of detainees to prevent a recurrence of such a tragic incident.
Protect institutional integrity: Ensure that accountability is not converted into an instrument for personal vendettas, political pressure or the unjustified discrediting of any public officer.
Promote professional standards: Sustain reforms aimed at improving personnel training, discipline, operational efficiency and the protection of lives and property throughout the country.
The NSCDC remains an important national institution with responsibilities that include protecting critical national assets and infrastructure, supporting internal security and contributing to the preservation of public order. Its capacity to discharge these duties effectively is in the public interest.
We therefore encourage the Corps’ leadership to remain focused on its statutory responsibilities while treating the Niger State incident with the seriousness it deserves.

VOTE OF CONFIDENCE IN THE NATIONAL MANAGEMENT OF THE NSCDC
In view of the foregoing, the Amalgamated Civil Society Groups of Nigeria hereby express its confidence in the national management of the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps under the leadership of Commandant-General Professor Ahmed Abubakar Audi.
Our position is based on our assessment of the national leadership’s institutional development efforts and our conviction that the Niger State incident must be addressed through a fair and evidence-based process that distinguishes individual operational responsibility from wider institutional oversight.
This vote of confidence is not a rejection of accountability, nor does it diminish the suffering of the victims and their families. Rather, it reflects our belief that justice must be pursued without prejudice, that responsibility must be established through evidence, and that the integrity of a national institution must be protected through transparency, professionalism and continuous improvement.
We urge the Federal Government, the NSCDC leadership and all stakeholders to ensure that the tragedy in Niger State becomes an opportunity to strengthen institutional safeguards, improve operational accountability and restore public confidence.

Yakubu Hails China’s Zero-Tariff Initiative as Catalyst for Economic Transformation

Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on China-Nigeria Parliamentary Relations, Hon. Jaafaru Yakubu, has applauded the Chinese Government’s expanded zero-tariff policy for African countries, describing it as a catalyst for Nigeria’s economic transformation and a major opportunity for export growth, industrialisation and job creation.
In a statement, Yakubu said China’s decision to extend its zero-tariff policy to 53 African countries, including Nigeria, demonstrates Beijing’s commitment to supporting Africa’s economic development and strengthening South-South cooperation.
He noted that the policy offers Nigerian businesses unprecedented access to one of the world’s largest consumer markets and provides a platform for expanding exports, attracting investment and enhancing economic competitiveness.
“China’s zero-tariff initiative represents a strategic opportunity for Nigeria to accelerate economic growth, strengthen domestic industries and deepen our economic cooperation with one of the world’s most important trading partners,” Yakubu said.
According to the lawmaker, early indicators suggest that the policy is already producing positive outcomes. He disclosed that Chinese imports from Nigeria rose significantly during the first half of 2026, while total trade volume between both countries reached approximately $18 billion, reflecting growing economic engagement.
Yakubu said the encouraging figures demonstrate the enormous potential of the Nigeria-China partnership and highlight the importance of improved market access in driving economic prosperity.
He stressed that Nigeria must seize the opportunity by expanding production capacity, improving product quality and strengthening export-oriented industries capable of competing in the international marketplace.
The committee chairman noted that Nigerian products such as liquefied propane, sesame seeds, nuts, hides and skins are already benefiting from improved access to the Chinese market. However, he emphasized that the country’s long-term objective should be to move beyond the export of raw materials and focus on value-added products.
“We must leverage this opportunity to promote domestic manufacturing, industrialisation and job creation. Increased market access should translate into stronger local industries and greater economic opportunities for Nigerians,” he stated.
Yakubu urged Nigerian manufacturers and exporters to take advantage of the tariff-free regime by improving standards, certification processes, packaging and supply chain efficiency in order to meet the demands of Chinese consumers.
He also called on relevant government agencies to strengthen the infrastructure and institutional support necessary to help local businesses compete effectively in international markets.
The lawmaker further encouraged Chinese investors to expand their presence in Nigeria through investments in manufacturing, agro-processing, technology development and logistics infrastructure.
According to him, increased Chinese investment would support industrial growth, facilitate technology transfer and create much-needed employment opportunities for Nigeria’s growing youth population.
While welcoming the growth in trade relations, Yakubu acknowledged the need to address the trade imbalance between Nigeria and China, stressing that efforts must be made to increase the country’s export capacity and diversify its export basket.
“Our goal should not merely be to trade more, but to trade better. Nigeria must become a producer and exporter of more finished and semi-finished goods if we are to fully benefit from our relationship with China,” he said.
Yakubu also expressed appreciation to the Government of the People’s Republic of China for its RMB200 million grant to support Nigeria’s development projects, describing the gesture as further evidence of the strong friendship and cooperation between both nations.
He said the grant would contribute to efforts aimed at improving infrastructure, strengthening public services and advancing national development priorities.
The chairman commended China’s longstanding support for Nigeria through infrastructure cooperation, technical assistance, capacity building and other development initiatives, noting that such partnerships have contributed significantly to the country’s growth.
Looking ahead, Yakubu called for greater collaboration in key sectors including manufacturing, agriculture, technology, logistics and industrial development.
He reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening parliamentary engagement and promoting policies that will advance the mutual economic interests of Nigeria and China.
“As Nigeria and China continue to deepen their partnership, our focus must remain on translating opportunities into tangible economic benefits for our people. Together, we can build a relationship that is mutually beneficial, economically productive and supportive of sustainable development,” he added.
Yakubu concluded by expressing gratitude to the Chinese Government and the Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, His Excellency Yu Dunhai, for their continued friendship, support and commitment to Nigeria’s development aspirations.

Grassland city in N China’s Inner Mongolia transforms into an AI computing hub 

By Yu Guangjun

How long does it take to travel from Ulanqab in north China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region to Beijing? By high-speed rail, roughly 100 minutes. Yet data traverses the same distance — more than 240 kilometers — in just 2.1 milliseconds via high-capacity fiber-optic cables.

Harnessing its abundant wind resources and cool climate, Ulanqab is rapidly emerging as a major computing hub. As of the end of August, the city had secured agreements for 109 computing projects, covering more than 7 million standard server racks, with 190,000 petaflops of computing capacity already in operation.

A Goldman Sachs report says that Ulanqab has emerged as one of the largest and fastest-growing AI computing clusters in the Asia-Pacific region.

How did a once-isolated city with limited industrial diversification become a rising force on the national and global stage?

For generations, Ulanqab’s harsh winters, low rainfall, and brief growing season constrained traditional agriculture. Its economy has long depended on farming and livestock, leaving many communities vulnerable to climatic fluctuations.

The city was once a key target of China’s poverty alleviation campaign. Over the decades, Ulanqab has earned a string of nicknames, including China’s “potato capital,” “oat capital,” and “wind power capital,” each reflecting its distinctive geography and economy.

Times have changed. Driven by the “East Data, West Computing” initiative, Ulanqab, this once austere landscape, is breaking free from the constraints of its traditional development path, rapidly emerging as a hub for cloud computing, AI computing, and token production. Behind this transformation lies a reimagining of how its natural resources can drive development.

Computing infrastructure requires enormous physical facilities. Servers run around the clock, creating two major challenges: securing a reliable power supply and dissipating the heat they generate.

This gives the computing industry different location priorities from traditional manufacturing. It does not necessarily need to be near densely populated cities; instead, it places greater emphasis on energy costs, climate, and available land. In this new equation, Ulanqab’s traditional geographic disadvantages are becoming assets in the digital age.

Take wind energy first. Ulanqab experiences 60 days of strong winds in spring alone. Combined with an annual solar radiation of 5,500-6,200 megajoules per square meter, these conditions give the city abundant wind and solar resources. Its wind and solar farms rank among the nation’s leaders in annual utilization hours, and installed renewable energy capacity has reached 20.67 million kilowatts.

Computing is an electricity-intensive industry. The more servers a data center operates and the greater its computing capacity, the more power it needs. Ulanqab’s wind and solar resources, once of limited use to traditional industries, now align with the massive electricity demand of data centers.

Cold weather carries new meaning here too. For traditional agriculture and livestock farming, low average temperatures and a short frost-free season limit the growing season. For data centers, however, the same cold climate offers a natural source of cooling.

Ulanqab’s average summer temperature is just 18.8 degrees Celsius, and the region enjoys nearly 10 months of natural cooling each year. Large data centers can use cool outdoor air to dissipate heat, reducing energy consumption by an estimated 30 percent. What once constrained agricultural production has become an economic resource that directly lowers computing costs.

Then there’s proximity. “Just a ‘step’ west of Beijing lies Ulanqab” is a slogan that captures the city’s close proximity to the capital. Ulanqab is over 300 kilometers from Beijing. For traditional goods, that distance can mean lengthy transport times and high logistics costs. For data, however, a dedicated 144-fiber, dual-route link to Beijing enables ultra-low-latency transmission.

Powered by green electricity, natural cooling and ultra-low-latency connectivity, Ulanqab is meeting growing demand from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region for AI training, autonomous driving R&D and big data processing.

By converting its natural and geographic advantages into digital hub strengths, the city is emerging as a green computing powerhouse. Leading companies in AI and smart vehicles are setting up operations there, driving the development of a full industrial chain spanning computing infrastructure, hardware manufacturing, cybersecurity, data services and talent training. Ulanqab is emerging as a key hub in China’s integrated national computing network.

Ulanqab is evolving from a transportation hub into a computing hub, unlocking new avenues for growth in the digital economy.

A conversation with Liu Cixin: From The Three-Body Problem to the future of humanity

By Chen Yuanyuan, People’s Daily

In 2006, Chinese science fiction writer Liu Cixin’s novel The Three-Body Problem began appearing in serial form in Science Fiction World magazine. Two decades later, the novel has not only made its mark on the world stage but also offered a lens through which to examine real-world developments. Artificial intelligence (AI), commercial spaceflight, and interstellar exploration are advancing at a remarkable pace, as humanity sets its sights on the far reaches of space. Recently, People’s Daily spoke with Liu about science fiction and the future of human civilization.

Q: What were you thinking when you first wrote The Three-Body Problem? How have your perspectives evolved since then?

Liu Cixin: Twenty years ago, as I typed The Three-Body Problem on a computer in my office deep in the mountains, I never imagined it would find such a large readership. First and foremost, The Three-Body Problem is a work of popular fiction, intended above all to tell a story that leaves readers stunned.

If I could step back into that moment, I might hesitate before including some of the darker themes woven into the story. They were originally narrative devices meant to engage readers, yet they have since been widely interpreted as reflections of what I later termed “cosmic sociology.” With such a vast readership today, I sometimes feel I have lit a fire that now burns beyond my control.

My fundamental worldview has remained unchanged over the past two decades. However, writing has grown more difficult. Generating fresh concepts for science fiction is increasingly challenging. On the one hand, AI is advancing rapidly. I am not worried about being replaced just yet, but what about 10 years from now? If AI can produce a superior manuscript in five minutes that would take a human writer five months to craft, what role will authors still play?

On the other hand, science fiction has permeated almost every aspect of our lives and society. Paradoxically, this has diluted its identity as a distinct literary genre, making it harder for science fiction writers to thrive as its influence continues to spread.

Contemporary Chinese science fiction is remarkably diverse. Younger writers often bring broader knowledge, wider perspectives, and a more nuanced understanding of how emerging technologies reshape society and everyday experience.

Q: What is your view of AI?

Liu Cixin: Most people are preoccupied with whether AI will replace or conquer humanity. My attitude is somewhat unconventional: I have a strong affection for AI.

Humans are inherently limited in intelligence, physical endurance, and cognitive capacity. We evolved to survive in the wilderness, not to explore the universe. Given our current capabilities, human civilization will never be able to expand beyond Earth into the wider universe.

AI, however, could help us overcome those innate limitations. Humanity’s grandest aspirations and ultimate goals could ultimately be realized with AI as a catalyst. AI points toward the future of Earth-based civilization. That future may not belong to humans, but it will still be meaningful.

In my personal routine, I rarely use AI. I treat it primarily as an advanced search tool. I have never used it to write fiction. Most of my creative time is devoted to developing story concepts, and AI still falls short in generating genuinely original, paradigm-shifting ideas that have never existed before.

Q: How should we prepare for a potential technological singularity?

Liu Cixin: As I understand it, the singularity refers to a point at which AI’s intelligence rapidly surpasses that of humans, bringing about unimaginable changes to all existing forms of human society, as well as to our political and economic systems. But this scenario may be an oversimplification.

Even if AI does advance at that speed, humanity still has many cards to play and can take various measures to guard against negative consequences. More likely, related technologies, such as human-machine integration and brain-computer interfaces, will also advance rapidly alongside AI. We may then see humans and AI increasingly merge with each other. As the saying goes: if we cannot compete with it, we might learn to integrate with it.

Q: What are your hopes for the future of space exploration?

Liu Cixin: I hope humanity will travel ever farther into space. Since the Apollo 11 moon landing, space has felt increasingly within our reach. I hope we can explore deep space, travel to Mars and the asteroid belt, and reach more distant celestial bodies, including the moons of Jupiter. We must keep looking outward, aiming for the farthest reaches of the observable universe.

If I were to travel to space, my priority would be to press my face against a viewport and gaze back at Earth. If I could witness just one moment in the universe, I would want to see the emergence of a truly intelligent civilization — to confirm that we are not alone and that cross-species communication is possible.

We now find ourselves in 2026, the very year in The Three-Body Problem when humanity is at its most bewildered and fearful in the face of an extraterrestrial crisis. Fortunately, reality has spared us from such a civilizational catastrophe, though new challenges continue to emerge worldwide.

As we navigate toward tomorrow, The Three-Body Problem remains a vital chapter in our cultural history. I eagerly await the next generation of visionary science fiction that captures the spirit of our era, charting a course toward the boundless sea of stars.

STATEMENT ISSUED BY PROGRESSIVES ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE, UNITY AND DEMOCRACY (PAJUD)

THE FALLACIES OF MIKE IGINI

“It is mean and cowardly and an evidence of weakness and utter demerit, for any group of people to attempt to commend themselves to the public by the negative process of belittling and condemning others.”_

  • Chief Obafemi Awolowo, 28th April, 1951.

The attention of the Progressives Alliance for Justice, Unity and Democracy (PAJUD) has been drawn to the barrage of insults heaped by Mike Igini, former Resident Electoral Commissioner of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), against every perceived and imaginary obstacle to his personal agenda.

We posit that since the return of democracy in 1999, the Nigerian political and electoral firmament has been overdosed with different genres of characters – the good, the bad and the ugly.

We state categorically and without fear of contradiction that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is NOT responsible for the non-appointment of Mike Igini as either Chairman of INEC or National Commissioner since he left office in disgrace and engulfed in controversies in the South-South.

Igini must understand that such appointments are not done willy-nilly. They are based on several criteria. He has served two full terms as Resident Electoral Commissioner. For him to be nominated as National Commissioner, a vacancy must exist for his state. This is apart from the principle of rotation of the position among states in the geo-political zone.

Those who know President Bola Ahmed Tinubu closely know he is a leader who does not deliberately shut the door against competence and capacity. Anyone holding him in contempt on this matter is either being mischievous or acting out the script of the opposition, just like the present issue at stake.

It is unfortunate that Igini has allowed himself to be taken advantage of, dancing to the rhythm of anti-Tinubu and anti-Amupitan rogue agents.

We find it compelling to state unequivocally that Igini is blatantly scheming to discredit the present government and the Amupitan-led leadership of INEC in anticipation of reward by opposition elements and spent forces, if they ever win in the post-2027 general elections.

Over the years, we have watched the transformation of Igini from lawyer, to public affairs commentator, to agitator, until the PDP government appointed him Resident Electoral Commissioner.

We are amused at Igini’s feeble attempts at returning to public reckoning, using barefaced criticism, outright lies, mischief and fallacies against the Renewed Hope and reformative agenda as a springboard to relevance and prominence.

For an egocentric, self-seeking bigot and Mr. Know-All like Igini, he wants to remain relevant as a bride for any juicy INEC Election Management Committee headship or membership, which we know will never happen in this dispensation as a result of his antecedents while in office – an era marred by allegations of partisanship, disloyalty and endless controversies.

Your tenure as REC in Cross River State was characterised by mudslinging between you and a political party over unethical conduct unbecoming of an electoral officer. Similarly, your flexing of muscles and one-sided narratives during your tenure as REC of Akwa Ibom State is still very fresh in our memory. Till date, you are still spewing negative narratives against one of the politicians you fought in that state to high heavens.

Nigerians from all strata continue to wonder where the monies for the live telecast of Igini’s exit as Resident Electoral Commissioner of Akwa Ibom State originated from. In the history of INEC – from Dr. Ephraim Akpata, Alhaji Shehu Musa, Dr. Abel Guobadia, the much-vilified Prof. Maurice Iwu, Prof. Attahiru Jega reputed to be Igini’s benefactor, to Prof. Mahmood Yakubu – none of them had the temerity for such lavish display and grandeur during their exit. What was witnessed in the last days of Igini as REC in Akwa Ibom evokes serious questions about collective decency, decorum, moral rectitude and values.

Any argument in support of such an extravagant exit lacks integrity, for the simple reason that the pay slip of INEC Resident Electoral Commissioners and even National Commissioners is not a hidden document. It is known to the Nigerian public.

We believe that if we are sincere in this country, Igini should focus on more important non-partisan issues than chasing shadows. Igini should also address his own record, including the troubling episode of a Kenyan national engaged by INEC as a consultant some years ago, where the voter register fingerprints of Nigerians were allegedly compromised and handed to foreign interests. That despicable act is still fresh in our memory.

As overwhelming majority of Nigerians with voting rights are aware, there is an uncanny lust for power by desperate opposition politicians lurking on the horizon. They are deploying everything on earth just to grab power in 2027, and for no just cause but simply for selfish personal aggrandizement. They have recruited former staff, Directors, Resident Electoral Commissioners and National Commissioners to help execute their warped agenda and barefaced propaganda to deceive gullible Nigerians who will swallow every hook, line and sinker narrative framed by them.

We unreservedly agree with many who have suggested that as a believer in God, Igini should not allow his mind to be poisoned by the notion that any power outside the influence of God could have been responsible for the failure of his emergence as either National Commissioner or Chairman of the Commission.

Whatever it is, there seems to be more to it than meets the eye. The process of creating anarchy starts with incitement against the government, the electoral empire and security agencies. It often appears so smooth as to be imperceptible, hence those who engineer it enjoy the process at the initial stage, only to be consumed at the end of the day.

Elements in the class of Igini, who are acting out the script of falsehood purveyors and peddlers, will be put to shame at the end of the day. There is no doubt that Nigerians are going to have a well-deserved, credible, transparent, free and fair election in the 2027 general elections.

Above all, nobody can dispute the fact that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu nominated people with impeccable ability, capacity, loyalty, patriotism and honesty as members of the election management structure that will drive our democracy forward, in a manner that both Nigerians and the international community will be proud of like never before in our annals.

The focus of the Tinubu administration remains its much stronger determination to protect and respect the sanctity and fidelity of the ballot during the forthcoming elections.

We implore Mike Igini to stop the rabble-rousing, negative framing, mischief, mudslinging and casting of aspersions against the electoral umpire and Mr. President, and find something reasonable to do to earn a living just like other Nigerians, instead of going from one radio station to television stations across the country. His antics are already known to Nigerians who are far more sophisticated and politically savvy than before.

A word is enough for the wise… “WHEN YOU CONDEMN PEOPLE, YOU BRING JUDGEMENT ON YOURSELF.”

Signed:Comrade Yakubu Dan Abba
Country Representative, PAJUD.

FJF Backs NSCDC Probe into Niger Miners’ Deaths, Cautions Diaspora Group Against Protest

The Freelance Journalist Federation (FJF) has expressed confidence in the committee investigating the reported deaths of 37 miners in Niger State, urging the public to allow the panel to conclude its assignment without undue pressure.

The federation’s position followed threats by the Nigeria Diaspora Organizations and Community for Human Rights (NDOCHR) to stage a protest at the headquarters of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) in Abuja over alleged delays in releasing the investigation’s findings.

FJF in a statement issued on Friday and jointly signed by FJF conveners Ibrahim Ali, Jonathan Modi, Okpara Isaac and Christopher Abah, described the investigative process as transparent and thorough, insisting that sufficient time should be allowed for the committee to complete its work and establish the facts surrounding the incident.

The federation criticised the proposed demonstration, describing it as unnecessary and politically motivated, while warning against actions that could heighten tensions over an issue involving the loss of human lives.

It also commended the leadership of the NSCDC, the Minister of Interior and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for what it described as their commitment to transparency, accountability and the rule of law.

According to the FJF, local civil society organisations monitoring the proceedings have expressed satisfaction with the panel’s conduct. However, the federation maintained that the investigation should be allowed to run its course before conclusions are drawn.

The group also rejected calls by the diaspora organisation for the immediate removal and prosecution of the NSCDC Commandant-General, Dr Ahmed Abubakar Audi, describing the demands as premature and inconsistent with the principle of fair hearing.
It argued that calls for sanctions before the conclusion of the investigation could undermine due process and prejudice public perception of the committee’s work.

The NDOCHR had also threatened to petition the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague over the matter. In response, the FJF maintained that Nigeria’s domestic legal and investigative institutions should be allowed to address the allegations through established procedures.

The federation urged Nigerians in the diaspora to exercise restraint and avoid actions that could inflame political tensions or interfere with the ongoing investigation.

It urged members of the public to remain calm and await the committee’s official findings, stressing that a thorough investigation was necessary to establish the circumstances surrounding the reported deaths and determine any responsibility arising from the incident.
The committee’s final findings and any subsequent official actions are expected to be central to resolving the concerns surrounding the incident.

The statement further called on the Inspector-General of Police and other security agencies to take appropriate steps to maintain public order in the Federal Capital Territory.

Why the world is looking east: The growing global appeal of China’s innovation ecosystem

By Li Hongxing, People’s Daily

One way to gauge a region’s appeal to investors and entrepreneurs is to listen to those already embedded in its ecosystem. Take a European founder based in Shenzhen, south China’s Guangdong province, who has called the city home for over a decade. He reports receiving daily inquiries from overseas startup leaders eager to visit, explore partnerships, or establish operations in China.

The steady stream of visitors eager to explore Shenzhen and its tech companies offers a glimpse into the growing global interest in China’s innovation ecosystem.

This is no fleeting trend. It underscores investors’ confidence in China and their optimism about the country’s prospects. The steady flow of overseas technology delegations, increasingly regular cross-border business discussions, and growing interest in “looking east” go beyond conventional economic and trade ties. They offer a vivid illustration of how the world is gaining a new understanding of China and seeking opportunities for cooperation and shared development.

Increasingly, entrepreneurs, researchers, and investment institutions from around the world are traveling to China to learn firsthand about its innovation mechanisms, industrial dynamics, and development pathways. Looking back at China’s evolving economic and trade ties with the world, this surging eastward focus marks a profound shift and more comprehensive, objective recognition of China’s development.

This transition from trade-centric partnerships to co-innovation rests on tangible structural advantages. Foremost among them is industrial resilience. While several major economies face deindustrialization pressures and cyclical volatility, China has maintained steady growth alongside continuous upgrading. Its comprehensive manufacturing base, extensive infrastructure networks, and large domestic consumer market provide a natural shock absorber, enabling predictable expansion even amid global headwinds.

Clustering amplifies this advantage. At a robot industrial park in Foshan, Guangdong province, for example, more than 90 percent of the components and other products needed across the supply chain can be sourced within the park. A design revised in the morning can undergo testing on the very same day. Industrial clustering, closely connected supply chains, consistent policies, and an open, inclusive market give investors at home and abroad the confidence to make long-term commitments and develop their businesses in China.

If industrial resilience provides the foundation, China’s vibrant innovation ecosystem and the rapid development of new quality productive forces are what give the country its enduring appeal.

Confidence in China’s development rests on its innovation capabilities. From basic research to practical applications, breakthroughs are emerging across a wide range of technological fields. 

These efforts are yielding visible results. In northwestern China, renewable energy projects in the Gobi Desert are powering data centers, transforming cities such as Ulanqab in Inner Mongolia and Qingyang in Gansu province into key nodes in the national computing network. 

Meanwhile, in Hefei, east China’s Anhui province, the experimental nuclear fusion device known as an “artificial sun” and the Zuchongzhi 3.0 quantum computing prototype continue to set world records, strengthening China’s position in frontier technologies. 

A recent report released by the World Intellectual Property Organization shows that China has 25 of the world’s top 100 innovation clusters, ranking first globally for the fourth consecutive year.

The more China innovates, the more the world stands to benefit. Some international observers have noted China’s increasingly important role in the global innovation ecosystem, while others have praised Chinese developers for pushing the boundaries of innovation every day. From quantitative growth to qualitative breakthroughs, and from individual advances to progress across entire systems, the vitality and rapid development of China’s innovation sector demonstrate that innovation can be made anywhere, and that practical action is what turns pioneers into leaders.

A strong industrial foundation and vibrant innovation are not enough on their own. They also need a favorable environment where they can flourish. By further opening up and continuously building a first-rate business environment that is market-oriented, law-based, and internationalized, China is strengthening the institutional foundations for attracting global resources and building momentum for shared development.

The advantages of this environment are reflected in more targeted services and the effective implementation of practical policies. Across China, for example, policies on entry visas, length of stay, residence, and support for integration are being improved to help foreign professionals put down roots, develop their careers, and grow their businesses. 

From more targeted industrial policies and efficient government services to robust intellectual property protection and an open, diverse innovation culture, China is introducing concrete reforms that make its environment more inclusive and its institutions more supportive, further enhancing its appeal as a place to develop and invest.

Looking beyond the surface reveals the deeper reasons behind the growing interest in China’s innovation ecosystem. The visible sign is the steady stream of visiting delegations; beyond that lie expanding opportunities for cooperation; at the deepest level is global confidence in China’s industrial strength, innovation capabilities, and institutional environment. Against the backdrop of global industrial transformation and rapid technological change, this interest reflects a rational assessment by market participants.

Looking ahead, China will continue to consolidate its foundations for development with the same persistence as a craftsman driving a nail, pursue new heights in innovation with the determination of a climber, and expand international cooperation with an open and inclusive mindset. By doing so, China can turn the growing global interest in “looking east” into mutually beneficial outcomes, demonstrating that China’s success can contribute to a better future for the world.

China’s former revolutionary base areas embrace new chapter of development 

By Li Hongxing, People’s Daily

Two bridges over the Huajiang River in southwest China’s Guizhou province offer a striking glimpse into the remarkable transformation of China’s former revolutionary base areas.

The first is the Huajiang Chain Bridge. With its iron chains and wooden-plank deck, it spans a section of the Beipan River. 

In 1935, as the Right-Flank Column of the Central Red Army advanced into southwestern Guizhou, the 11th Regiment of the Third Red Army Corps held its position here, buying precious time for the main force.

This wartime lifeline embodied the determination to overcome every challenge and fight for victory.

The other one, the Huajiang Grand Canyon Bridge, is pushing the boundaries of bridge construction in mountainous terrain through intelligent construction, innovative materials, advanced wind-resistant designs, and environmentally friendly building techniques. 

Its construction, which has set multiple world records, has effectively bridged the “gaps” created by the mountains and canyons.

The old and new bridges now stand within sight of each other, offering a vivid picture of how former revolutionary base areas have changed, and Guizhou is far from the only example.

The opening of flights at Ruijin Airport in east China’s Jiangxi province has given people in southern Jiangxi and western Fujian, both former revolutionary base areas, a new “air corridor” linking them with the rest of the country. 

The Jiajin Mountain Tunnel in southwest China’s Sichuan province has entered trial operation, turning the arduous journey “over” the mountain into a smooth passage “through” it and freeing local residents from worries about mountain closures caused by winter snow and ice.

Bridges spanning valleys, passenger planes roaring overhead, and tunnels piercing through mountains — the path to modernization for old revolutionary base areas is growing ever broader.

What is driving these once-remote areas to take on a new look? 

Major undertakings call for riding the tide of the times. Development anchored in the prevailing trends of the era ensures the right direction and provides a strong driving force. That once-remote regions are no longer isolated, and less-developed areas no longer lag behind, owes much to their ability to seize opportunities of the times and align themselves with broader development trends.

Deep in the mountains of Baisha township in Jishui county, Jiangxi province, fruit farmers are now able to sell their produce through livestreaming. This mountain hamlet, where people once “shouted to communicate and traveled on foot”, is now equipped with 5G base stations, bringing new vitality to rural revitalization.

Today, China boasts nearly 4.6 million 5G base stations and over 30.53 million gigabit-capable network ports, achieving gigabit-level connectivity for every county and 5G coverage in every township.

From snow-capped mountains peaks to seashores, from the depth of dense forests to desert steppes, digital infrastructure functions like an intricate neural network, bridging the digital divide and bringing the benefits of digital and intelligent technologies to every corner of the country.

For many regions, abundant resources and convenient locations offer a head start. Yet experience shows that the availability or scarcity of resources and other factors of production is never an absolute determinant. With the right approach and by building on their own strengths, regions can turn limitations into new advantages and cultivate new growth drivers from what they already have.

During the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, the people and soldiers of the Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Border Region stepped up production to break the enemy’s blockade, turning Qingyang in Gansu into the “granary of eastern Gansu.”

Today, Qingyang has once again taken stock of its strengths, drawing on its abundant energy resources and cool climate to develop data centers. Massive volumes of data can travel from Shanghai to the city in a matter of seconds, while computing power in Qingyang enables entrepreneurs in Guangdong in south China to render 3D models at high speed. 

As server lights replace oil lamps and streams of digital data flow across the land, data and computing power have become a new kind of “grain,” helping drive local development while serving the needs of the country as a whole.

Industrial upgrading and regional development both require a focus on local strengths and core industries, as well as openness to wider cooperation and integration.

The Fujian-Ningxia collaboration is a case in point. New forms of cooperation, such as “Fujian enterprises + Ningxia resources” and “Fujian headquarters + Ningxia production bases,” are deepening and expanding. Freight trains under Ningxia’s multimodal transport “single-document system,” a system featuring one unified transport document covering the entire journey across different transport modes, carry full loads of goods bound for Fujian, Guangdong and beyond.

Mountains and seas no longer stand as barriers. What began as one-way assistance has evolved into two-way mutual collaboration. Cross-regional reconfiguration of production factors has made regional cooperation more resilient and substantive.

From the transformation of former revolutionary base areas to coordinated progress across regions, and from these changes to the steady and high-quality growth of China’s economy, China is continuing along its Long March in the new era, moving forward with courage and opening up new horizons.