Centre for Crises Communication

His Excellency,
Sir Siminalayi Fubara
Executive Governor of Rivers State
Government House, Port Harcourt
Rivers State.

Dear sir,

LETTER OF FELICITATION

The Management and Staff of the Centre for Crisis Communication (organisers of the Niger Delta Heroes Award 2025) heartily felicitate with you on your graceful return to office following the expiration of the state of emergency.

Your candour, calm disposition, and exemplary leadership throughout the challenging period stand as a true testament to your noble character and statesmanship. We are indeed proud to be associated with you.

As you resume the mandate freely entrusted to you by the good people of Rivers State, we wish you continued success, wisdom, and strength in the service of your people.

Congratulations, Sir.

Yours sincerely,

Chief Dressman Darlinton-Gbolobofa
Chairman, South-South Zone

Disambiguating Jurisdictional Boundaries of Federal and State Governments in Electricity Regulation

By Emmanuel Ukera, Esq

The enactment of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN),1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 and the Electricity Act, 2023 which paved way for full devolution of intra-state electricity regulatory powers to state governments have stirred up a lot of contestations amongst stakeholders than ever imagined.

The bone of contention appears rooted in the misconception amongst stakeholders regarding the extent of the regulatory powers available to state governments under the current multitier regulatory regime recognized by the CFRN (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 and the EA,2023. One of such misconceptions which has gained traction in the media is that the recent constitutional alteration and the consequent enactment of the EA, 2023 have for the first time devolved electricity regulatory powers to sub-nationals to the extent that the newly established State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) can now regulate ( in all its ramifications), electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities within state boundaries to the exclusion of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission ( NERC), which hitherto regulated electricity activities nationwide.

Relatedly, there are those who are of the strong opinion that under the current legal regime, power plants located within state boundaries should fall under the overriding regulatory powers of SERCs including full takeover and control of the eight (8) power plants now operated by the eight successor generating companies (GENCOs) that emerged after the conclusion of privatization in 2013.

It has also been argued that the EA,2023, is an iniquitous and needless piece of legislation which has abolished cross-subsidization and provided the framework for promotion of energy inequalities especially considering the disproportionate distribution of electricity infrastructure between the northern and southern states of Nigeria.

The instant intervention seeks to disambiguate the jurisdictional boundaries of the SERCs and NERC under the current legal regime and shed light on recent debates.

To fully understand the jurisdictional confines of the two levels of governments regarding electricity regulation in Nigeria, it must be stated that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) and the Electricity Act, 2023 constitute the primary sources of electricity law in Nigeria currently. Furthermore, there are other federal enactments that must be taken into consideration when discussing the regulatory powers of the two levels of government.

These include the Standard Organization of Nigeria (Establishment)Act which is the general legislation on national technical standards; Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission Act which is the general legislation on competition, consumer protection, and anti-trust; Climate Change Act ,2021 which deals with climate change mitigation and adaptation bearing in mind Nigeria’s international commitment to climate change; Water Resources Act, CAP W2, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) ,2004 which regulates the planning, development and use of water resources that affects more than one state; National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) Act; and the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, CAP.E12, LFN,2004 which are relevant in the area of environmental impact of electricity projects or related activities in the power sector. Additionally, licensed electricity entities operating under the regulatory purview of state regulators are expected to comply with extant federal enactments on company income tax, personal income tax and value added tax etc .

The above, amongst others constitute the gamut of laws that are critical in disambiguating the legislative and regulatory competences of the two levels of government in Nigeria on the issue of electricity and should be well understood by key players in the power sector.

With respect to the powers of the two levels of government under the Constitution, one must recall that prior to 1999, the business of electricity generation, transmission and distribution was for decades under the sole control of the defunct National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) as a vertically integrated monopoly.

The defunct NEPA operated a redial national grid system comprising of on-grid power plants, high voltage transmission lines and distribution lines through which electricity albeit epileptically was supplied to Nigerian nationwide without regard to geographic boundaries of state governments.

This integrated high voltage system of interconnected generation plants, transmission lines, substations and related facilities crisscrossing states of the Federation and beyond that was operated by NEPA as a unified network is what is essentially referred to as the national grid system.

However, following the promulgation of the CFRN,1999, electric power was included as an item on the concurrent list. In this regard, item F, paragraphs 13,14, and 15, Part II, Second Schedule to the CFRN,1999 (“the Constitution”) defined the legislative competence of the respective levels of government regarding electricity.

The implication of the aforementioned constitutional provisions is that, since 1999, state governments were at liberty to invest in electricity within their domains including the power to set up of state grids and regulate intra-state electricity where they possess the wherewithal. No state government took advantage of this constitutional provision either due to lack of the political will or some other inexplicable reasons.

It is, however, important to note that prior to constitutional alteration in 2023, the powers of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on intra-state electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities was greatly impeded by the restriction under paragraph 14 (b), Part II, Second Schedule to the Constitution “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State”.

It was this restrictive phrase “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State” that was essentially deleted through the enactment of the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023. According to the long title to the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No,17) Act,2023, the constitutional alteration was intended to “allow states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity in areas covered by the national grid”…. What is apparent from the foregoing is that it is not correct to say that the CFRN,1999, (Fifth Alteration) Act (No.17) Act,2023 for the first time transferred “electric power” from the exclusive list to the concurrent list as it is often reported in some sections of the media. Electric power was an item in the concurrent list to the CFRN 1999 and remains so even after the said constitutional alteration of 2023.

What the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 did is to simply delete the inhibitive words “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State” to allow state governments legislate on and regulate intra-state electricity activities and most fundamentally “generate, transmit and distribute electricity in areas covered by the national grid” as expressly stated in the long title.

In other words, the constitutional alteration was not aimed at empowering state governments to embark on far reaching regulatory measures that would conflict or undermine the regulatory powers of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) such as taking over NERC licensed on-grid power plants, setting tariffs or slashing tariffs for electricity procured through the National Wholesale Electricity Market(NWEN) or regulation of other activities on the national grid .

The constitutional alteration was primarily intended to promote investments within state boundaries without being inhibited by the presence of the national grid or component of it within such state boundaries.

In simple terms, by virtue of this constitutional alteration, state governments can now embark on embedded generation, mini-grids, licensing and regulation of independent electricity distribution networks (IEDNs) and independent electricity distribution network operators (IEDNOs), and even set up state grid even if such activities have bearing on the national grid.

Unfortunately, most state governments have since focused on issuing controversial regulatory measures that will throw the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) in disarray and put the state regulators at cross-purposes with NERC instead of taking initiatives that will boost investments and ultimately improve electricity access to their citizens, the latter being the primary intendment of the constitutional alteration.

Furthermore, the powers of state governments to legislate on and regulate intra-state electricity activities without being inhibited by the presence of the national grid as recognized by the CFRN (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 must be understood against the preeminence powers of the federal government to ” make laws for the Federation or any part thereof with respect to — electricity and establishment of electric power stations, generation and transmission, damming of water for electricity generation, cross-border electricity trading and distribution, promotion and establishment of the national grid system, regulation of right of any person to use, work, operate any plant, apparatus, equipment or work designed for the supply or use of electrical energy as provided under paragraph 13 (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)and(f) part II, Second Schedule to the Constitution all of which remains unaffected by the recent constitutional alteration.

The implication is that it will amount to constitutional infraction for any state government to set or approve parallel technical standards and operational codes or set up an agency for enforcement of technical standards under the guise exercising intra-state electricity regulatory powers.

Similarly, while state governments are at liberty to invest around the national grid presence within their state boundaries, in deference to the powers of the federal Government to regulate the national grid system as indicated above, any investment around the national grid including activities, transactions and services that have bearing on the national grid system will still require the authorization (not license) of NERC before such can legally take place. Such activities, transactions and services that will require NERC authorization may include : interconnection to, injection into, wheeling of electricity over, withdrawal of electricity from the national grid; sale and purchase of electricity, the delivery of which requires the use of the national grid; provision and receipt of ancillary services to or from the national grid; use of metering, control, dispatch and other systems required by the Grid Code for interconnection and wheeling services etc.

The law is trite, the apex court has held in the case of **AG. Ogun State v.Aberuagba &Ors (1985)LPELR-3164** that the powers of state governments to legislate on matters in the concurrent list to the Constitution is limited by the constitutional doctrines inconsistency and covering the field.

One other issue that requires clarification here is the claim in some quarters that the EA,2023, is an iniquitous and needless piece of legislation which has abolished cross-subsidization and provided the framework for promotion of energy inequalities. This is an erroneous impression borne out of lack proper understanding of the objectives, principles and rigorous processes that culminated into the enactment of the EA,2023.

To begin with, the issue of cross-subsidization was introduced through the Power Consumer Assistance Fund (PCAF) and first given statutory recognition under the Electric Power Sector Reform Act,2005 (now repealed) but retained under part XV of the EA,2023.

However, with the full decentralization of electricity including policy matters, the framework for subsidy administration in the NESI is currently undergoing review in the National Assembly bearing in mind the need to allow for the two levels of government to take independent policy decisions on matters of electricity subsidy and also determine fairly, which categories of electricity consumers should bear the brunt of cross subsidization under the current multitier electricity industry.

It must also be added that the Electricity Act,2023 is not a framework for promotion of energy inequalities but was introduced following a rigorous stakeholder engagement including the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) to replace the EPSRA,2005, the latter being a reform legislation that became unsuitable for the next phase of the electricity market after conclusion of the privatization exercise in 2013.One of the key features of the EA,2023 as a compelling framework for addressing energy inequalities is the provision of Section 110 which imposes an obligation on NERC to ensure fair spread of transmission and other electricity infrastructure across the country. Similarly, the EA,2023 for the first time made provision for integrated resource planning and leveraging on this provision the Federal Executive Council recently approved the National Integrated Electricity Policy and Implementation Plan,2024 which takes into consideration the peculiar strengths and weaknesses of the various state governments. It is expected that state governments will take advantage of this paradigm shift that recognizes a robust role for wind,biomas, solar and other renewable sources of energy in addressing perceived or existing energy inequalities.

From the foregoing, it can be safely concluded that the current legal regime for regulation electricity in Nigeria as articulated above leaves no room for confusion or controversy. With about 14 states already enjoying regulatory autonomy within their respective state boundaries, NERC should focus on regulation of the NWEN and activities on the national grid system while states should focus on retail activities within their respective boundaries without encroaching on the jurisdiction of NERC.

The primary focus of state governments at this stage of the market should be to adopt state integrated electricity policies and plans that will among other things leverage on potentials for generation and consumption of electricity from renewable sources such as wind, solar and biomass and as a priority integrate a large number of big self-generation consumers into the emerging state markets. A robust plan for integration of self-generation consumers into the nascent state electricity markets can in the short and medium terms be achieved through embedded generation, issuance of licenses for IEDNs/IEDNOs and mini-grids etc.

The Federal Government through the Ministry of power should equally fast track and streamline ongoing transmission and distribution upgrades under the auspices of FGN Power to allow for efficient evacuation of generated power across state boundaries where such states are in position to execute bilaterals that recognize NERC tariffs. State governments should avoid toying with the idea of unstructured tariffs which has left the National Wholesale Electricity Market in crippling debts.

The weakest links in the Nigerian power value chain today remains the transmission and distribution segments and with concerted efforts being made by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu,GCFR to settle legacy debts owed GENCOs, radical actions need to be taken to conclude ongoing upgrade of the transmission and distribution assets for operational and financial synergy along the national grid.


Barrister Ukera, Esq can be reached on emmauks@yahoo.com

China issues its first central document on carbon market development

By Kou Jiangze, People’s Daily

The carbon market is a crucial policy instrument for leveraging market mechanisms to address climate change and accelerate the transition toward a green, low-carbon economy.

In a significant step toward strengthening the nation’s commitment to climate action, China has unveiled a guideline to accelerate the country’s green and low-carbon transition and strengthen the construction of the national carbon trading market.

This document represents the first central government document dedicated to the carbon market, providing robust institutional frameworks and enhanced capacity-building support. The goal is to cultivate a more effective, dynamic, and internationally influential carbon market.

China has already established a national carbon emissions trading market for major emission sources to fulfill mandatory reduction obligations. Furthermore, a voluntary greenhouse gas reduction trading market has been developed to encourage self-reduction efforts by the broader society.

“These two markets operate independently but are connected through an offsetting mechanism that allows the surrender of allowances. Together, they form a unified national carbon market system that ensures full coverage of emitters,” explained Xia Yingxian, an official with China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment.

In March this year, the mandatory carbon market expanded for the first time to include the steel, cement, and aluminum smelting industries – sectors responsible for over 60 percent of China’s total carbon dioxide emissions. 

Since 2023, China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment, in collaboration with relevant departments, has issued six methodologies, including those for afforestation carbon sinks and offshore wind power, progressively expanding the voluntary carbon market. 

As of August 22 this year, the cumulative trading volume in the mandatory market had exceeded 680 million tons, with a transaction value of 47.41 billion yuan ($6.66 billion). The voluntary market recorded cumulative trading of 2.49 million tons of certified voluntary emission reductions, totaling 210 million yuan.

To reinforce institutional development, China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment and relevant departments have introduced more than 30 regulations and technical standards, establishing a multi-tiered and relatively comprehensive regulatory framework for the carbon market. Authorities have intensified supervision of data quality, employing digital tools to issue early warnings on potential data risks and cracking down on the falsification of carbon emissions data. 

“After years of development, China has established a preliminary carbon market system with distinctive Chinese characteristics. A carbon pricing mechanism centered around the carbon market is steadily taking shape,” said Yan Gang, head of the South China Institute of Environmental Sciences under the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. 

The acceleration of carbon market development will allow the market to play a decisive role in resource allocation, stimulate widespread participation in green and low-carbon practices, and spur innovation in low-carbon, zero-carbon, and negative-carbon technologies. This is crucial for fulfilling emission reduction responsibilities, achieving dual carbon targets, and reducing overall abatement costs for society.

The newly released guideline outlines a clear “timetable” and “roadmap” for the future development of the national carbon market.

From the perspective of the mandatory carbon market, by 2027, the coverage will gradually extend beyond the existing power generation, steel, cement, and aluminum industries to include other major industrial emitters.

In the voluntary carbon market, which currently includes renewable energy, methane reduction, energy efficiency, and forestry carbon sinks, new areas such as biomass utilization, solid waste treatment will be incorporated, with comprehensive sector coverage by 2027. By 2030, China aims to establish a voluntary carbon market that is trustworthy, transparent, standardized, widely accessible, and aligned with international standards.

The management of emissions allowances is essential for ensuring the efficient and orderly operation of the Chinese national carbon market and achieving policy objectives. The guideline stresses the need for a predictable and transparent system for carbon quota allocation.

According to Xia, China currently adopts an intensity-based approach to allowance allocation. Moving forward, in line with the “dual carbon” goals, the nation will gradually shift to a cap-based system. By 2027, industries with relatively stable emissions will face absolute caps, with a pre-established national emissions cap allocated to enterprises through a top-down approach.

At the same time, China will explore both free and paid allocation methods, establish an allowance reserve, and introduce a market adjustment mechanism to balance supply and demand, thereby enhancing market stability, liquidity, and risk management capabilities.

By advancing the development of its carbon market, China will combine an effective market with proactive government policies to ensure a vibrant yet well-regulated system, thereby unleashing green productivity, creating new quality productive forces, and driving the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development.

China has approved 43 innovative drugs in the first half of 2024, up 59 percent year on year

By Wang Yunna, People’s Daily

“I used to enjoy seafood with beer when I was younger, but for years, I haven’t dared to indulge,” said 63-year-old Lu Ping, diagnosed with gout eight years ago. “Because of tophi, my big toe joint swelled so severely that even the slightest movement caused excruciating pain. I had to wear size-52 shoes.”

During a hospital visit, Lu learned that a new innovative drug was undergoing clinical trials and immediately signed up. “The pain from gout attacks was unbearable, and I wanted to try any potential solution,” he explained. 

Now, he takes one pill a day, under the close supervision of his doctors, who monitor safety and assess the drug’s effectiveness by testing his uric acid levels every month or two. 

The new drug was developed by ApicHope Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., based in Guangzhou, the capital of south China’s Guangdong province. Gouty arthritis is intensely painful, and patients have a significant demand for effective treatments. When reviewing global research on gout therapy, the company’s R&D team discovered that there had never been an oral medication specifically designed to dissolve tophi.

“Developing new drugs is highly challenging, but if we can solve this problem, we will fill a major gap in the market,” said Li Hanxiong, chairman of ApicHope.

The process of identifying a potential compound involves screening between 5,000 and 10,000 molecules. “It’s like searching for a needle in a haystack,” explained Yang Wenqian, head of a research institute under ApicHope. 

An even greater challenge was pinpointing a viable drug target. “Much like aiming an arrow, a drug only works if it targets specific proteins or nucleic acids within the body. However, these targets are hidden among trillions of cells. There are no shortcuts, only patience and persistence,” Yang added.

After several attempts, the team identified a urate transporter protein. Normally, most uric acid filtered by the kidneys is reabsorbed into the bloodstream through this transporter, boosting the body’s antioxidant and anti-infection capacity. 

“By inhibiting this transporter, could we lower uric acid levels in gout patients?” the team wondered.

Building on this hypothesis, the team began developing urate transporter inhibitors while optimizing molecular structures to minimize side effects and enhance efficacy. 

At the end of 2022, China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved clinical trials for the drug to ensure its safety and effectiveness before it could be released to the market. More than 1,500 patients have since participated in the trials. 

“Leveraging the wealth of top-tier hospitals in Guangzhou, we partnered with local doctors and doctors to accelerate research, clinical testing, and market entry,” said Li.

Beyond medical resources, Guangzhou has also rolled out supportive policies to foster a robust biopharmaceutical industry ecosystem. The combined efforts of the government and enterprises have significantly accelerated the development and approval of innovative drugs.

The city has introduced policy measures to support the high-quality growth of the biopharmaceutical sector, invested in global science initiatives such as the human cell atlas and human proteome project, and now hosts 45 institutions certified under good clinical practice standards. These efforts create a comprehensive support system covering the entire innovation process.

“Our new drug follows a model where R&D is carried out in the Greater Bay Area, while regulatory filings are made globally,” Li noted. The NMPA’s Greater Bay Area branch has designated the drug as a priority project, providing early-stage guidance in clinical research to accelerate the approval process. 

With strong infrastructure, sound policies, and a supportive environment, companies are better able to attract top talent, refine their R&D and commercialization systems, and bring new treatments to market more rapidly. 

“Our company has 15 innovative drugs in the pipeline, with more soon to move into mass production,” he added.

Recently, China’s National Healthcare Security Administration and the National Health Commission issued 16 measures to promote the high-quality development of innovative drugs, injecting fresh momentum into the industry.

Since last year, the NMPA has piloted reforms in 11 provincial-level branches, cutting the review period for supplemental drug applications requiring verification from 200 working days to just 60. The agency is also exploring a 30-day approval timeline for priority innovative drug trials. 

In the first half of this year alone, China approved 43 innovative drugs, up 59 percent year on year, demonstrating that reform dividends are driving industry growth.

Over the past five years, China has approved 210 innovative drugs, maintaining rapid growth. Today, China accounts for about 30 percent of the world’s innovative drugs in development.

China’s zero-carbon park charts a path toward emissions reduction

By Wang Yunshan, People’s Daily

A zero-carbon park refers to an industrial park that, through coordinated planning, design, technology, and management, reduces carbon emissions from both production and daily life to near-zero levels, while laying the groundwork for achieving net-zero in the long run.

As China enters a decisive stage in meeting its carbon peak target, the country faces mounting challenges, such as integrating renewable energy into the national grid and decarbonizing energy-intensive industries. Against this backdrop, zero-carbon parks are emerging as an important tool for regions seeking to accelerate green transformation.

Cutting energy use: Transitioning to green power based on local conditions

Just three kilometers from the Dafeng Port Zero-Carbon Industrial Park in Yancheng, east China’s Jiangsu province, a 13.76 MW solar power plant is steadily delivering renewable electricity.

“The green power generated here is first transmitted to the Jincheng 110 kV substation, then routed along two paths: one delivers electricity directly to the zero-carbon park, while the surplus is fed into the broader grid. When renewable output falls short, the main grid steps in to ensure stable supply,” explained Wu Huilu, head of the Dafeng Port Zero-Carbon Industrial Park. 

According to Wu, more than 85 percent of the park’s electricity consumption is expected to be traceable to green power sources by 2030.

In north China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region, the Ordos Mengsu Economic Development Zone is also accelerating its energy transition. A local zero-carbon park has established an independent distribution network and a 220 kV substation directly connected to the park, supported by a 385 MW wind-solar-storage project. Once operational, the facility will provide 900 million kWh of green electricity directly to the park each year.

To address the inherent volatility of renewable generation, the Ordos park has deployed an intelligent Internet of Things-based control system that links energy supply with industrial demand.

“This system connects upstream power generation facilities, which can forecast output within milliseconds, to downstream enterprises where real-time electricity use is tracked. By integrating data across generation, grid, load, and storage, the system allows renewable output to align more closely with flexible and dynamic demand,” said Wang Yao, general manager of the Ordos branch of Envision Group, a Chinese green tech company.

Restructuring Industries: Enhancing green competitiveness

At the Yancheng plant of Lianxin Iron and Steel, a 70-ton electric arc furnace is slated for replacement by a more efficient 100-ton model.

Steel and paper-making companies have traditionally been the largest energy consumers in the Dafeng Port Zero-Carbon Park. “Upgrading just this one furnace will allow the company to consume 60,000 MWh of green electricity annually, reducing carbon emissions by more than 260,000 tons,” Wu noted.

Creating a “green cell” requires more than improving existing industries but cultivating new industries with low energy consumption, minimal pollution, and high added value.

In the Ordos park, industries such as photovoltaics, hydrogen fuel cells, and green hydrogen equipment manufacturing are expanding rapidly. By integrating upstream and downstream players in joint de-carbonization efforts, the park enables companies to use clean energy to make low-carbon products, creating a virtuous cycle in which green energy attracts green industries, and green industries, in turn, drive greater consumption of green energy.

Strengthening management: Leveraging AI to improve smart oversight

At the carbon management center in the Dafeng Port Zero-Carbon Industrial Park, a large digital screen displays real-time energy and carbon data on emissions, electricity purchases, and energy consumption of key enterprises.

“In 2023, we established Jiangsu Carbon Intelligence Operations Co., Ltd. and launched a smart energy-carbon management platform. It provides localized and customized carbon management services to enterprises, including carbon accounting, green power and certificate acquisition, and carbon offsetting,” Wu explained. The park is exploring the use of AI technology to forecast and manage carbon emissions in real time, further advancing intelligent management.

Meanwhile, the Ordos park has achieved near-zero wastewater discharge. Through a system of pre-treatment, biological processing, advanced treatment, and membrane filtration, it recycles 95 percent of its wastewater, saving about 34 million cubic meters of freshwater annually.

From renewable energy deployment and industrial restructuring to digital oversight and low-carbon infrastructure, the creation of a zero-carbon park is a complex and integrated undertaking that requires careful planning and coordinated efforts.

“Constructing zero-carbon parks not only makes a direct contribution to emissions reduction, but more importantly, through these ‘zero-carbon cells,’ China is gaining experience, exploring pathways, and developing models for building a zero-carbon society,” said an official with China’s National Development and Reform Commission.

BRICS should play a greater role in addressing the challenges of the times

By He Yin, People’s Daily

On Sept. 8, Chinese President Xi Jinping attended a Virtual BRICS Summit and delivered an important statement, calling on BRICS countries to forge ahead in solidarity and cooperation.

To advance greater BRICS cooperation amid mounting global challenges, Xi made three proposals: upholding multilateralism to defend international fairness and justice; upholding openness and win-win cooperation to safeguard the international economic and trade order; and upholding solidarity and cooperation to foster synergy for common development. 

These proposals highlight China’s firm commitment to advancing steady and sustained BRICS cooperation and providing greater certainty and stability to the world in these turbulent times.

Transformation unseen in a century is accelerating across the world. Hegemonism, unilateralism, and protectionism are getting more and more rampant. Trade wars and tariff wars waged by some country severely disrupt the world economy and undermine international trade rules.

At this critical juncture, the actions of BRICS countries, which stand at the forefront of the Global South, will have profound implications for the future of multilateralism and the open world economy. 

The heightened expectations for BRICS, especially from the Global South, make the summit’s message of unity and responsibility all the more significant. All participants agreed on the necessity for BRICS countries to strengthen solidarity and collaboration, jointly respond to crises and challenges, safeguard multilateralism, uphold the international system of free and open trade, and protect the common interests of the Global South.

Multilateralism is the shared aspiration of the people and the overarching trend of the time. It provides an important underpinning for world peace and development. No country has the right to monopolize international affairs. International rules and order must be shaped and maintained collectively. 

Facing an international landscape marked by turbulence and uncertainty, it is essential for BRICS, an increasingly influential organization, to follow the principle of extensive consultation and joint contribution for shared benefit, and safeguard the international system with the United Nations (UN) at its core and the international order based on international law. 

This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, as well as the 80th anniversary of the founding of the UN. In this momentous year, the Global Governance Initiative proposed by Xi offers Chinese wisdom and solutions for strengthening and improving global governance. It is widely acknowledged that the initiative is pertinent and points the direction and path for improving global governance.

Economic globalization is an irresistible trend of history. Countries cannot thrive without an international environment of open cooperation, and no country can afford to retreat to self-imposed isolation. China remains committed to building an open world economy, upholding the multilateral trading system with the World Trade Organization (WTO) at its core, and promoting a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization. 

This vision aligns with China’s legitimate rights and interests while serving the broader common good. It seeks mutually beneficial cooperation and upholds the integrity of international rules. 

What China pursues is to ensure that Global South countries can participate in international cooperation as equals and share in the fruits of development, an approach widely recognized and supported by BRICS members and beyond. 

As South African President Cyril Ramaphosa observed, at a time when the restructuring of the world economy presents both challenges and opportunities, BRICS must remain united to uphold the WTO-centered multilateral trading system.

Unity breeds strength. The more closely BRICS countries work together, the more resilient, resourceful and effective they are in addressing external risks and challenges.

Together, BRICS countries account for nearly half of the world’s population, around 30 percent of global economic output, and one-fifth of global trade. They are also home to major natural resources, big manufacturers and vast markets, enjoying distinctive advantages in terms of market access, resources, and industries. 

BRICS should take an active role in fostering development cooperation, identifying new growth opportunities in emerging sectors, and continuously expanding space for mutually beneficial cooperation. By working hand in hand to strengthen the foundation, momentum, and impact of greater BRICS cooperation, they can deliver more practical benefits to their peoples while amplifying their global influence.

China is ready to work with fellow BRICS countries to implement the Global Development Initiative and advance high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, turning shared commitments into concrete actions and taking BRICS cooperation deeper and further.

The weight of BRICS lies in its unity and cooperation. Its true value emerges through perseverance and progress. China is ready to collaborate with its BRICS partners to play a greater role in addressing the challenges of the times, making new and greater contributions to building a community with a shared future for humanity.

Revitalizing forest communities through science and technology in the Lesser Khingan Mountains

By Guo Xiaolong, People’s Daily

In late August, the early signs of autumn brought a chill to the Lesser Khingan Mountains, a forested region in northeastern China. However, inside the Songshan ganoderma cultivation workshop, managed by the Hebei Forestry Bureau under Longjiang Forest Industry Group Co., Ltd. in Heilongjiang province, the air remained pleasantly warm.

“The temperature must be maintained between 23 and 26 degrees Celsius; any higher could cause the fungus to deteriorate,” explained Bai Linjin, a planting expert and one of the first specialists stationed at the Hebei Science and Technology Backyard. As he demonstrated cultivation techniques, a group of local forestry workers gathered around, observing his detailed instructions.

Worker Dai Kebao, who had worked at the Hebei Forestry Bureau for over 30 years, took notes and snapped photos. “It’s reassuring to have experts teach us hands-on like this!” he remarked. 

The Hebei Science and Technology Backyard, officially established in July this year, has become a new driver of ecological conservation and industrial development in the region.

“For generations, the local community relied on logging for its livelihood. When logging operations ceased, many families found themselves without a source of income,” recalled Dai. Having witnessed the rise of the logging industry and its eventual decline, he understood the complex challenge of balancing forest conservation with economic stability.

This dilemma – protecting forests while ensuring a stable income – was a challenge not only for the Hebei Forestry Bureau but also for many forestry regions across the country. Dependence on traditional logging practices left the under-forest economy underdeveloped, with low-value products like mushrooms and wild vegetables fetching meager prices. Furthermore, academic research often remained detached from practical applications in the forest.

Gong Qianwen, head of the Hebei Science and Technology Backyard, remembers his first visit to the region. “I witnessed local workers losing half of their ganoderma crop due to pests and diseases, simply because they lacked the knowledge to manage these issues. It was disheartening,” he said. It was then that Gong recognized the importance of “translating” laboratory innovations into practical, accessible methods for forestry workers.

Established through a partnership between Longjiang Forest Industry Group, Northeast Forestry University, and Heilongjiang Ecological Engineering College on July 17, the Hebei Science and Technology Backyard is designed to directly support the forestry community.

Researchers are stationed on-site to address problems, students gain hands-on experience, and local workers acquire new skills. This integrated approach transforms research into tangible benefits for the region.

In mid-August, Bai’s phone rang late at night. It was Dai, urgently seeking guidance. “Bai, what should I do? My ganoderma bags appear to be growing mold!”

Bai immediately drove more than 20 kilometers to the ganoderma shed, where he quickly diagnosed the issue – excess humidity had caused the appearance of aerial mycelium, not contamination.

“Don’t worry. Ventilate the shed tomorrow and reduce watering to keep humidity below 45 percent,” he advised. Bai remained on-site until 1 a.m., providing hands-on instruction in using a thermometer-hygrometer to monitor conditions.

“What sets our Backyard apart is the direct support from experts. They speak in simple terms and provide round-the-clock assistance until the issue is resolved,” noted Gong. Since its inception, the backyard has brought together 37 specialists in fields ranging from ecological conservation to healthcare and edible fungi cultivation.

Songshan ganoderma, a local specialty, had long been regarded as a raw material, sold for just 60 yuan ($8.43) per kilogram. With the guidance of the Science and Technology Backyard, a development strategy has been implemented, emphasizing the creation of high-value products rather than merely cultivating raw materials.

“In the past, I grew black fungus on five mu (about 3,340 square meters) and earned a maximum of 50,000 yuan annually. Now, with the experts’ advice, I’m growing ganoderma and processing it into wellness products, which will significantly increase my income,” Dai said.

Wu Si, a 26-year-old PhD student in ecological civilization studies at Beijing Forestry University, joined the backyard in July. Every day, she accompanies her professors to the field, collecting data and making observations. “In class, ecological protection seemed like an abstract concept. Now I understand that protecting the environment doesn’t mean doing nothing. With science and technology, forests can both thrive and support local prosperity,” she said. 

For Sun Tiancheng, an official with the Hebei Forestry Bureau, the true value of the backyard lies its impact on mindsets. “We once believed that simply having the forest would ensure our livelihood. Now, we understand that forests must not only be preserved but actively nurtured. With technology, they can truly flourish,” Sun said. 

Moving forward, the bureau plans to integrate ganoderma cultivation, forest wellness, and eco-tourism into a comprehensive “ecology + industry” model, ensuring that more workers benefit from the advances in science and technology.

Great Bay University: A new era of education and innovation

By Wu Dan, He Linping, People’s Daily

On June 19 this year, China’s Ministry of Education officially approved the establishment of Great Bay University (GBU), located near Songshan Lake in Dongguan, south China’s Guangdong province.

The term “Greater Bay Area,” initially a purely geographical concept, has evolved to represent economic dynamism, technological innovation, and leadership. Now, it extends into the realm of higher education, with the creation of a new model for research universities. 

What sets GBU apart?

The university’s location plays a key role in its vision. Situated just minutes from Shenzhen, a renowned technology hub, GBU benefits from proximity to some of the Greater Bay Area’s most cutting-edge scientific and technological resources. The region is home to tech giant Huawei, China’s first pulsed spallation neutron source, and the Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, among others. Notably, lunar soil samples brought back by the Chang’e-5 lunar mission have been sent to the region for study.

“Establishing the GBU near Songshan Lake fosters closer cooperation with local laboratories, large-scale scientific facilities, and leading tech companies. The excellent transport links to Guangzhou and Shenzhen further enhance our connectivity,” explained Tian Gang, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and founding leader of the university. 

The university features two campuses: the Songshan Lake campus, which is already in use, and the Binhai Bay campus, still under development.

GBU is strategically focused on science and engineering, offering high-quality education on a smaller scale. Its initial academic programs include mathematics, applied mathematics, physics, materials science and engineering, computer science and technology, and industrial engineering. 

In its first undergraduate admissions in July, GBU enrolled 80 students in the physics program, with all available slots filled in the initial round. Despite its modest intake, the university boasts a robust faculty, with nearly 300 teaching and research staff, of whom 70 percent have experience at top-tier international universities and research institutions, including 10 academicians and 78 national-level leading talents.

“We encourage our undergraduates to work with different mentors and gain hands-on laboratory experience. Our curriculum is designed to align with national needs, social demands, industrial priorities, and global frontiers,” said Zhao Jinkui, executive dean of the School of Material Science of the GBU. 

GBU promotes a model of collaboration, including partnerships between universities, research institutes, and leading enterprises. These initiatives aim to align with the development needs and industrial planning of the Greater Bay Area. Guangdong province is spearheading top-level educational planning, optimizing the distribution of universities, and fostering a cluster of world-class institutions with distinctive Greater Bay Area characteristics.

Innovative institutions such as GBU, Southern University of Science and Technology, and Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology are reimagining educational models, advancing interdisciplinary research, and cultivating top-tier talent in emerging sectors.

Additionally, joint-venture universities such as Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), and City University of Hong Kong (Dongguan) are promoting sustainable and collaborative development, contributing to a more open and high-level educational ecosystem. 

Meanwhile, vocational institutions such as Shenzhen Polytechnic University and Guangdong Industry Polytechnic University are pushing the boundaries of vocational education, training professionals with both solid theoretical knowledge and practical skills to support the region’s industrial transformation.

“We are advancing a higher education strategy focused on excellence, addressing gaps, and strengthening distinctive strengths, to develop universities of greater depth and quality,” said Lin Rupeng, director of the Department of Education of Guangdong province.

Each year, Guangdong allocates dedicated funding to support universities in their pursuit of world-class status and the development of world-leading academic disciplines. This includes financial support for talent recruitment, research projects, platform development, and academic programs, while also granting universities greater operational autonomy, Lin added.

Chinese manufacturing is undergoing upgrades, winning consumers at home and abroad

By Li Hongxing, People’s Daily

Chinese products are capturing global attention with ever more creative innovations. This summer, a portable split air conditioner developed by a Chinese manufacturer became a sensation in Europe. Easy to install without drilling holes in walls, it not only protects historical buildings but also sets a benchmark for energy efficiency and environmental protection, prompting even those previously uninterested in air conditioners to reconsider.

Today’s “made in China” is increasingly associated with ingenuity as well as affordability and variety. In one viral example, an American influencer gave his father a solar-powered fan hat made in China for Father’s Day. When the father wore it while barbecuing outdoors, he was so delighted that he broke into an impromptu dance. The video quickly went viral on social media, driving sales of the quirky solar hat through the roof.

By catering to specific needs and tailored scenarios, Chinese brands are steadily gaining recognition among overseas consumers. The growing appeal of “shopping in China” underscores this momentum. From January to June this year, both sales and departure tax refunds on duty-free goods purchased in China increased by 94.6 percent and 93.2 percent year on year, respectively.

Why is “made in China” winning such wide popularity abroad, and what is driving the surge in “shopping in China”?

Beyond reliable quality and exceptional value for money, the deeper reason lies in China’s comprehensive upgrade of its manufacturing sector, from design and production to brand building. By combining Chinese creativity with localized strategies, companies are better equipped to meet the diverse demand of global consumers.

Meeting demand is the key to winning markets. As products “go global,” they encounter a broad spectrum of consumer expectations, requiring adaptability across the entire product lifecycle, from functional design and scenario application to cross-border logistics and marketing services.

Food delivery robots provide a telling example. A yakiniku restaurant in Hachinohe, Japan, purchased robots from a Shanghai-based company to address labor shortages. However, models that had performed well in China initially struggled to win acceptance in Japan. After investigation, the company realized that the robot’s appearance, service pace, and size did not align with local preferences. By redesigning them to be smaller and more agile, the company quickly won customer approval. 

This deep integration of technological and industrial innovation, coupled with stronger capabilities to collect real-time feedback and rapidly iterate products, marks a new stage of upgrading in Chinese manufacturing and a fresh source of competitive advantage globally.

Cultural marketing represents another frontier. The more creativity and cultural value embedded in a product’s design, the stronger its appeal and the higher its brand value. 

Consider a jewelry brand that combines traditional craftsmanship with modern aesthetics. When it opened its first overseas store in Singapore this June, customer traffic rose steadily, with many drawn by the artistry and cultural symbolism of its pieces. 

Meanwhile, a company in Dongguan, south China’s Guangdong province, turned dozens of traditional medicinal herbs from Bencao Gangmu (Compendium of Materia Medica, a herbology and nature masterpiece in China), into collectible figurines, promoting traditional Chinese medicine culture while also launching toy lines inspired by Shanhaijing, or The Classic of Mountains and Seas. These cultural-themed products have found enthusiastic audiences overseas.

By combining design with culture and technology, Chinese manufacturers are moving beyond “functional” to “user-friendly,” and further toward “user-friendly and aesthetically pleasing.” Affordable products enriched with cultural sophistication embody an upgrade in value creation.

By capturing consumer demand, embracing innovative and personalized design, and ensuring reliable quality, “made in China” is reshaping its image worldwide. Behind this transformation lies a shift from “quantity advantage” to “quality advantage,” the strengthening of collaborative industrial supply chains, and the rapid emergence of new quality productive forces.

With a continued commitment to high-end, intelligent, and green development, underpinned by advances in technological innovation and cultural integration, Chinese manufacturing is set to move steadily along a broader path of high-quality growth.

A timely proposal: Global Governance Initiative charts path forward amid global challenges

By Pei Guangjiang, Li Yingqi, People’s Daily

As early autumn unfolded, two major events in China captured global attention. 

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit in Tianjin voiced strong support for defending multilateralism and the international order. Meanwhile, commemorations marking the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War underscored the shared resolve to honor history and build a better future. 

At this pivotal moment, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s proposal of the Global Governance Initiative (GGI) came at the right time. It offers Chinese solutions for strengthening the international order and addressing the chronic shortcomings of global governance. Amid mounting global turbulence and transformation, the initiative provides a timely framework for international cooperation and injects fresh momentum into efforts to overcome governance deficits worldwide.

This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, and the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations (UN). 

Eight decades ago, chastened by the devastation of two world wars, the international community established the UN, opening a new chapter in global governance and laying the foundation for lasting peace and development. 

Today’s commemorations serve not only to remember that hard-won history but also to reaffirm the commitment to international order, advance reform and improvement of the global governance system, and work toward the shared vision of building a community with a shared future for humanity.

However, the international landscape today is fraught with instability and uncertainty. The UN-centered multilateral system is under strain, and global governance deficits continue to widen. 

In terms of participation, the Global South remains seriously underrepresented in the global governance system, even as emerging markets and developing countries continue growing in influence, highlighting the urgent need to enhance their representation and correct historical injustice. 

In terms of principles, the purposes and principles of the UN Charter are not being consistently upheld, Security Council resolutions are sometimes ignored, while unilateral sanctions and actions in violation of international law undermine international order. 

In terms of effectiveness, implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has fallen behind schedule, while urgent issues such as climate change, widening digital divides, and governance gaps in emerging sectors such as artificial intelligence, cyberspace, and outer space, remain unresolved.

Against this backdrop, the questions of what kind of global governance system should be built and how it should be reformed and improved have become pressing concerns for the international community.

The GGI responds to these questions and points the way forward, meeting the urgent needs of today’s world. It rests on five principles: sovereign equality, respect for international rule of law, commitment to multilateralism, a people-centered approach, and concrete action. Together, these highly targeted and forward-looking principles provide systematic answers to the fundamental questions of who governs, how governance is carried out, and whom it ultimately serves. 

As Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko observed, these five principles strike at the heart of what is required to address the deficiencies of today’s international mechanisms.

The GGI’s core principles are consistent with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and reflect the common expectations of the vast majority of countries. Reforming and improving the global governance system is not about dismantling the current international order or creating new systems outside the existing framework. Instead, it seeks to strengthen and improve the capacity and effectiveness of existing systems and mechanisms, making them more effective, more inclusive, and more responsive to the realities of a changing world.

As President of the Republic of the Congo Denis Sassou Nguesso remarked, this initiative offers a pathway toward a more just and equitable international governance system, bringing tangible benefits to countries of the Global South.

History advances like a relay, with each generation taking up the baton in pursuit of human progress, moving forward step by step in answering the questions of the times. 

China stands ready to work with all parties to enhance communication and coordination, jointly implement the GGI, explore pathways toward reforming and improving global governance, and promote the development of a more just and equitable global governance system, thereby contributing to the noble cause of peace and development for all humanity.