Nigeria Times

Chief Michael Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN, a former Minister for Justice and Attorney General of the Federation is a 2027 governorship hopeful in Benue State.

The revered legal luminary cum politicians in this interview with ARISE TV speaks on some topical issues that happened during the administration of late president Umar Yar’Adua.

He also speaks on the 2027 governorship election among other national issues. Excerpts:

Former Governor Peter Obi questions President Tinubu’s constant travel outside Nigeria and his ability to govern. How will you react to that?

Well, thank you for that question; that is his personal opinion. The issue of
presidential powers, legally, the executive powers under section 5 of the
constitution are embodied in the President himself as a person and as I had said before that the President can rule and take decisions affecting the country from any part of the world and I still maintain my position. Of course I was vindicated on that point, that was when Yar’Adua was sick and after that President Johnathan was in Brazil, after that the former President Buhari was also out of the country for a long period.

The presidential powers, not only the presidential powers but where is power created by Statute or persons appointed and even in private offices, the powers are embodied in the person so appointed until the day he ceases to hold the office. Technology has so much improved now that the issue of sitting
physically in the office does not arise for anybody to exercise his powers. That is why you see in many most organizations abroad now people work from home and that’s also why you have companies in Europe having employees in Africa especially Tech companies because everything is done by computers, virtual
meetings and other devices. So I don’t think former Governor Peter Obi is fair to the President on that point because the President’s travelling cannot affect the presidential powers vested in him. He can exercise it anywhere and I believe he does it because his mails are transmitted to him electronically. Secondly, this is not an issue to play politics with, when President Bola Ahmed Tinubu came into power, the economy was very weak, extremely weak and therefore there was need for him to reopen Nigeria to the whole world. When he assumed office, there were lots of things that created fear such as the herder/farmers conflicts, Boko Haram and insurgencies so all these created fear to the international community with respect to investing in Nigeria, not only the international community but even Nigerians living abroad became discouraged to sending funds into the country. So I believe, in my own opinion, the president traveling
to give assurance at the highest level government is one of the best things that has happened to Nigeria. I don’t share Mr. Obi’s opinion, and this is evident by the surge of the foreign reserve and as at last week, it went up to 44 Billion US Dollars which is comfortable, not too comfortable but still it’s a great improvement that gives security for our international trade, it gives security for
our banks to operate letters of credit and I am excited that Nigerian banks do not need a foreign bank confirmation for opening our letters of credit. These are the things that have a positive impact on Nigeria, which may partly be as a result of the President engaging with the global community to reconnect Nigeria. So I do not go with former Governor Peter Obi on this issue, first it doesn’t impair the presidential powers embodied in him and he can exercise these powers anywhere in the world once an issue is brought to his notice. Secondly, we are
practicing a presidential system of government where the executive powers
under section 5 of the constitution can be delegated to the Vice President,
Ministers and all other person’s the executive powers are delegated to, that
means that even a cleaner derives his powers to carry out executive function
from the President under the Nigerian constitution. It is not a dictatorship that you expect that the dictator stands that whatever he says is final. Powers are appropriately delegated and Ministers are appointed. Therefore, I have respect for former Governor Peter Obi but I don’t understand the point he is trying to make. Frankly it doesn’t make sense to me on this point.

You presented the country request for an increase of the country continental shelf from 200 nautical miles to 350 nautical miles. What are the security and economic benefits?

Well, let me go back to the issue of increase of the Continental shelf which
started in 2000 under President Obasanjo and when late President Yar’Adua
assumed office in 2007 and found that it was necessary to continue with the
good work on the increase of the Continental shelf from 200 nautical miles to 350 nautical miles which had started under his predecessor President Obasanjo.

The wisdom for this is not farfetched. First, Nigeria was a state party because we signed a treaty, the United Nations Treaty on the law of the Sea on the 1st of July 1983 and then we deposited the instrument of fortification on 14th August 1986
so by then the convention law entered into force in Nigeria by 16th July 1994. So you see, we became a full member to benefit from the convention and I think
that is how then Presidents Obasanjo and Yar’Adua saw that Nigeria has
challenges in the gulf of Guinea.

One of the challenges was bunkering, the next was Piracy, so to avoid the
possibility of piracy that engulfed Somalia and clean up our international waters, safeguard the gulf of Guinea as it relate to Nigeria. So Nigeria started the preparation and in 2009 I led a delegation, the delegation actually was to be led by the Chairman of the National Boundaries Commission which statutory was the Vice President. I was in Brazil when I was instructed by the Vice President to go and lead the Nigerian delegation. So I left Brazil straight to New York, spent five
days looking at the paperwork and I did a presentation to the UN Commission,
which was presided over by a Brazilian. It was a moving moment when at the end
of the presentation the members of the committee were asked by the Chairman
if they had any questions and they said they didn’t have because it was a
beautiful presentation. We first highlighted how we complied with the law. We secondly highlighted how we had consulted our neighbors including Ghana and physically brought the no objections response tenders before the Commission and this warranted us to have the approval in principle for us to proceed with our proposal for consideration by the 24th Session of the Commission. We submitted everything to the sub-committee for details and technical delineation was to be set up by the Commission.

The advantage was obvious, effective policing of our maritime boundary because if you move the Continental shelf to 350, the small boats cannot reach to that limit of the Continental Shelf. When most of the people that were involved in oil bunkering realized that our Continental shelf was just 200 nautical
miles it was obvious that small light boats that are used in bunkering can safely deliver bunkered crude oil which is delivered to ships that even if they are just a meter outside the 200 nautical miles the Navy cannot go there.

That was the premise, at the time the issue of bunkering. President
Obasanjo and subsequently President Yar Adua saw the need to conclude work
on this, that was the primary consideration. Again, after the Bakassi, we needed to ensure that the sacrifices done by Cross River to mitigate their losses and our understanding was that if we conclude work on the 350 nautical miles, the seabed minerals, hydrocarbon and fishing will also accrue to Calabar which in our opinion at that time had lost substantially as a result of the handover of southern part of Bakassi to Cameron in compliance with the International Court judgement. That was the wisdom, economic gain, policing of the Maritime zone and the gulf of Guinea more efficiently as it relates to Nigerian boundaries. That was the main wisdom, we concluded that work and crossed the first huddle. I don’t know what happened but I didn’t hear any further work, because I left
government.. First I was removed as Attorney General on 10th February 2010 so I was no longer a member of the Boundary Commission because I was reassigned as Minister of Special Duties so I really don’t know why the whole of that period of the government of President Good luck Johnathan I was not in a position to know whether the technical work continued or why it delayed that much, even with the serious support of United Nations Commission of Laws of the Sea we had.

They were in total agreement with our submission because nobody asked us any questions. We had the support of our neighbors so we didn’t know why they didn’t extend it during the President Johnathan administration as he was also the prime person because he was the Chairman of the Boundary Commission as Vice President. He was in the know of everything, when I made the successful presentation. Let me not give credit to myself, in going to make the presentation, I was accompanied by Nigerian Permanent Representative to
United Nations Professor Joy Ogwu and the Director General of the National
Boundary Commission Alhaji Sadiq Digi and our presentation was made pursuant
to Article 76 paragraph 8 of UNCLOS which gave us sufficient approval I do not know what has led to this delay.

Then I started hearing about work on it towards the end of the administration of President Buhari. I am extremely glad that President Ahmed Tinubu reopened work on it and even received a report on it that shows the level of attention. He saw the wisdom in what President Obasanjo started and how President Yar’Adua crossed the first huddle.
As President Ahmed Tinubu is pushing this to the stage now to my mind
he is a visionary leader who has seen the security and economic benefits of the increase of the Continental shelf and I seriously commend him for that. I also saw the possibility of mitigating the losses of Cross River government as a result of Bakassi which in particular is the southern part of Bakassi.

Why was bakassi peninsula handover to Cameroon considering the fact that the cross river state, which houses the eastern naval commander since 1971, was hemmed out?

During our time because of the shores of Calabar we still felt they were a Littoral state. When Federal Government was to hand over Bakassi in 2005 the Navy objected and raised a lot of objections on the premise that they
will not have access to the Sea if Cross River is hemmed out and that would
constituted a very serious threat. Cameron is a friendly nation but every friendly nation is a potential enemy.. it was a very serious complaint by the Nigerian Navy and the Eastern Navy Command Headquarters was established in 1971 by the government of General Gowon to curtail any maritime challenges coming from the Gulf of Guinea. It was something President Yar’Adua took seriously. Of course not only President Yar’Adua, the Navy also made objections to the National Assembly so before we took the decision to hand over we had to work on that threat that the Nigerian Navy would be unable to access the Sea if Calabar was hemmed. So in my opinion the practical demographics is laid out at the demarcation is laid at the Northern part of Bakassi which is still part of Nigeria and it ensures that Calabar would be protected by the Nigerian Navy because Calabar was still left as a Littoral state, they were not hemmed out that is based on the technical report given to us in 2008 because we had to invite the
Surveyor General and international experts to look at the judgement of the
International Court of Justice and the delineation and know whether the
Nigerian Navy situated in Calabar will be hemmed out. But this was not the case. I left office and the judgement came in 2012 that Cross River was hemmed
out. I was shocked… Supreme court in their wisdom decide on what is brought
to them so I don’t know the data that was taken to the Supreme court. At that
time, President Yar Adua had died, I was no longer in office so I don’t know up
till now, I keep wondering what kind of data that was presented that brought
that result and if they say so then the Eastern Navy Command should have been shut down because they will have no access to the Sea from Calabar axis. To me, Cross River State ought to be an oil producing State in the Northern part of
Bakassi based on the line of demarcation which we resolved. This area was
supposed to remain in Cross River, but I don’t know what happened. It may be the data that was brought to the Supreme Court; maybe it was different from the one the Navy resolved with us because we did not shut down the Eastern Navy Command Headquarters in Calabar and taken out to Port Harcourt. We needed an Armed force that can police the gulf of Guinea and that is the Navy. We gave the Nigerian Navy direct access from Calabar Estuaries to the Atlantic Sea.
I don’t know what transpired but I think that it is something that has to be
resolved. You see the implementation of the judgement involved certain things,
equity, political decisions and effective and technical diligence, so I wouldn’t know whether the one they gave us that led to us believing the Nigerian Navy Eastern Command Headquarters in Calabar were not hemmed out from Atlantic Sean directly using Calabar Estuaries at that time is different from the one they present to the court. Mind you, as former Attorney General I cannot challenge the wisdom of the Justices of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court will give judgement based on evidence and I am saying that President Yar’Adua wouldn’t have taken the security of the country lightly. The practical effect of our decision is that the Eastern Naval Command remained in Calabar so how do they operate if they are hemmed out?
So part of the Bakassi which is now the western part of Bakassi is still
remaining in Cross River and the in-shores are still there which are open to the Sea. Actually I am at a loss as per the data that was presented which was the basis of the argument at the Supreme Court; and that is the extent I can talk
about it because when Supreme Court is involved you have to be careful. I am
only talking in defending the decision of the President Yar’Adua Administration, which led to me going to Calabar to handover Southern part of Bakassi on 14th August 2008.

There was nothing like that,we never had any complaints until 2012 that
we heard that Cross River was hemmed out. We never received such negative
complaints. That is the position.

The people of your state, Benue have been calling you to contest the 2027 governorship election. Have you accepted to contest and will you say you are qualified?

Sincerely, I don’t want to comment on that issue, because only God gives
power to whom He wants, and when God wants. If you go by provision of the
Constitution, I am qualified. Anybody is qualified to be Governor of the state. If he or she meets the Constitutional requirement, I can only answer that question in relation to the people making threats. I was born around the sixties during the Tiv riots, political crisis. When I grew up I read terrifying stories and how people were killed/maimed and if you were NPC then UMBC will murder you, some will
put a nail in your head and murder you. I am mindful of what is going on, I read
history of the same thing happening in the Western part of Nigeria at that time
and such incidence has not occurred again in Nigeria, maybe it reared out in
Ondo in 1983.

The leadership of the country especially under President Tinubu. Starting from President Yar Adua tolerated opposition. Right now you have ADC going round, some even attack the physical credibility of the president and I have not seen where their members have been attacked. Something is coming out in Benue that is frightening. I read in the papers where the president of the a subregional group the KUDA Kunav Development Association was saying that any person from Kunav that contests for governorship should be attacked and
beaten up and then the Vice Chairman of the local government also said that
any Kunav son that contests shall be attacked. I am not from Kunav but then there is this general slogan that “No Alia, No Benue.”

These are unfortunate rhetorics, we should never look in that direction. If you are popular then there is no need to input violence in your campaign because if you are indeed popular then people will vote for you. If you have done things to endear people to reelect you they will. Though I have not heard it personally from the Governor but he needs to call those people to order because by saying so they are saying he is no longer popular. By saying so they are trying
to insinuate that he has lost that popularity and therefore this time they are not going to persuade the people but they are going to use force to bring him back.

They should remember what happened in Tiv land, in the Sixties.
Constitutionally I am qualified because the constitution of Nigeria is clear
and what is written in the Constitution cannot be added nor subtracted. So
going by the constitution, I am qualified, I have not been convicted or declared bankrupt so going by the constitution I am qualified to contest.

The only frightening aspect and I want to allude to it and this has to stop. If people attack the credibility of the President and he never said such things because he believes in the rule of law and he believes that the things he has done in the country can earn him reelection then why should people who claim to be supporters of the
Governor say that if there is No Alia, No Government, No Benue? The Reverend
Fr. as Governor, ought to be a man of peace, it is up to him to advise his
supporters to respect the law to prevent any likelihood of breakdown of law and
Order in Benue State and Nigeria at large. This thing is frightening, this is the flagship that we believe should be addressed quickly because what happens in Benue can become dangerous.

What happened in 1962 and 1964 should never be allowed again in Nigeria and
it is not something the security agencies should take for granted. So that’s the only thing I say about this for now. When the time comes we will know about it. By law the time for campaign has not started. Until it is time, as a law abiding
citizen, I will not talk on that issue.

Thank you

Former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Mike Kaase Aondoakaa, SAN has maintained that the decision by late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s to handover Bakassi peninsula was to safeguard Nigeria’s security and should not be faulted rather it should be commended.

The former number one chief law officer of the Federation made the declaration on Tuesday, when he appeared on ARISE NEWS daily morning show.

Aondoakaa said he had “sleepless nights” when the Bakassi handover took place and felt compelled to clarify misrepresentations. He emphasised that neither President Obasanjo, who implemented the Green Tree Agreement, nor President Yar’Adua, who presided over the 2008 handover, endangered Nigeria’s security.

“I don’t want the name of late President Yar’Adua to be tainted that he took a decision that affected the security of our country. We did not. We did not from our data,” he declared.

The Bakassi Peninsula dispute stemmed from a 2002 International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that ceded the oil-rich territory from Nigeria to Cameroon. In line with the 2006 Green Tree Agreement, Nigeria formally handed over Bakassi to Cameroon in August 2008 under President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, following initial steps taken by former President Olusegun Obasanjo. The decision sparked controversy at home, with critics arguing it stripped Cross River State of its coastal status and vital oil resources, while supporters maintained it upheld international law and preserved Nigeria’s diplomatic credibility.

Aondoakaa argued that the data available at the time showed Cross River State was not stripped of its littoral status. He pointed out that the Eastern Naval Command headquarters in Calabar — established in 1971 — remained operational, proving that Nigeria’s coastal security was not compromised.

He further explained that the Navy and the Surveyor General’s office worked with the government to ensure the demarcation line did not harm Nigeria’s security interests, stressing that the Supreme Court later acted on evidence different from what his administration had.

“This is not to say that I’m challenging the wisdom of the Supreme Court justices. It was the evidence presented to them. There might have been an error in the data presented to them. It’s possible. The Supreme Court acts on evidence. And it is the evidence presented to them. It is the evidence given to us that we felt Nigeria was adequately protected. And Cross River was not hewed out. Our concern then was the Eastern Naval Command headquarters, that it should not be hewed out,” he said.

On the contentious issue of oil wells, Aondoakaa said the 72 oil wells in question represented less than three percent compared to over 2,000 wells in Akwa Ibom.

“If you look at 72 oil wells in relation to 2,000 oil wells in Akwa Ibom, it is less than 3%. So, our goal was not about the oil. In our demarcation, we ensured that everything was well-protected and well-balanced,” he said.

Aondoakaa maintained that if errors exist, they stem from later political decisions or evidence presented after he left office in 2010, not from actions taken under Yar’Adua’s government.

See Full Transcription Below

BAKASSI

During our time because of the shores of Calabar we still felt they were a Littoral state. When Federal Government was to hand over Bakassi in 2005, the Navy objected and raised a lot of objections on the premise that they would not have access to the Sea if Cross River was hemmed out — and that would constitute a very serious threat.

Cameroon is a friendly nation, but every friendly nation is a potential enemy. It was a very serious complaint by the Nigerian Navy, and the Eastern Navy Command Headquarters was established in 1971 by the government of General Gowon to curtail any maritime challenges coming from the Gulf of Guinea. It was something President Yar’Adua took seriously.

Of course, not only President Yar’Adua; the Navy also made objections to the National Assembly. So, before we took the decision to hand over, we had to work on that threat that the Nigerian Navy would be unable to access the Sea if Calabar was hemmed in.

In my opinion, the practical demographics is laid out at the demarcation in the Northern part of Bakassi which is still part of Nigeria — and it ensures that Calabar would be protected by the Nigerian Navy because Calabar was still left as a Littoral state. They were not hemmed out.

This was based on the technical report given to us in 2008 because we had to invite the Surveyor General and international experts to look at the judgement of the International Court of Justice and the delineation and know whether the Nigerian Navy situated in Calabar would be hemmed out. But this was not the case.

I left office and the judgement came in 2012 that Cross River was hemmed out. I was shocked… The Supreme Court in their wisdom decided on what was brought to them. At that time, President Yar’Adua had died, I was no longer in office, so I don’t know up till now what kind of data was presented that brought that result.

If they say so, then the Eastern Navy Command should have been shut down because they would have no access to the Sea from the Calabar axis. To me, Cross River State ought to be an oil-producing State in the Northern part of Bakassi based on the line of demarcation which we resolved. This area was supposed to remain in Cross River, but I don’t know what happened.

It may be the data that was brought to the Supreme Court was different from the one the Navy resolved with us — because we did not shut down the Eastern Navy Command Headquarters in Calabar and move it to Port Harcourt. We needed an Armed Force that can police the Gulf of Guinea, and that is the Navy. We gave the Nigerian Navy direct access from Calabar Estuaries to the Atlantic Sea.

I don’t know what transpired, but I think it is something that has to be resolved.

Mind you, as former Attorney General I cannot challenge the wisdom of the Justices of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court will give judgement based on evidence. President Yar’Adua wouldn’t have taken the security of the country lightly. The practical effect of our decision is that the Eastern Naval Command remained in Calabar — so how do they operate if they are hemmed out?

So, part of the Bakassi — which is now the western part — is still remaining in Cross River, and the in-shores are still there which are open to the Sea.

Actually, I am at a loss as per the data that was presented which was the basis of the argument at the Supreme Court. That is the extent I can talk about it because when the Supreme Court is involved, you have to be careful.

I am only talking in defence of the decision of the President Yar’Adua Administration, which led to me going to Calabar to hand over Southern Bakassi on 14th August 2008.

There was nothing like that, we never had any complaints until 2012 when we heard that Cross River was hemmed out. We never received such negative complaints.

That is the position.

GOVERNORSHIP

Sincerely, I don’t want to comment on that issue, because only God gives power to whom He wants, and when He wants.

If you go by provisions of the Constitution, I am qualified — anybody is qualified to be Governor of the state if he or she meets the Constitutional requirement.

I can only answer that question in relation to the people making threats.

I was born around the sixties during the Tiv riots and political crisis. When I grew up, I read terrifying stories of how people were killed or maimed. If you were NPC, then UMBC would murder you. Some would put a nail in your head and kill you.

I am mindful of what is going on. I read history of the same thing happening in the Western part of Nigeria at that time, and such incidents have not occurred again in Nigeria — maybe it reared out in Ondo in 1983.

The leadership of the country, especially under President Tinubu — starting from President Yar’Adua — tolerated opposition. Right now, you have ADC going around; some even attack the physical credibility of the president, and I have not seen where their members have been attacked.

Something is coming out in Benue that is frightening. I read in the papers where the president of the sub-regional group KUDA (Kunav Development Association) was saying that any person from Kunav that contests for governorship should be attacked and beaten up. Then the Vice Chairman of the local government also said that any Kunav son that contests shall be attacked.

I am not from Kunav, but then there is this general slogan: “No Alia, No Benue.”

These are unfortunate rhetorics. We should never look in that direction. If you are popular, then there is no need to input violence in your campaign, because if you are indeed popular then people will vote for you.

If you have done things to endear people to re-elect you, they will.

Though I have not heard it personally from the Governor, he needs to call those people to order. By saying so, they are saying he is no longer popular. By saying so, they are insinuating that he has lost that popularity and therefore this time they are not going to persuade the people but use force to bring him back.

They should remember what happened in Tiv land in the Sixties.

Constitutionally, I am qualified because the Constitution of Nigeria is clear. What is written in the Constitution cannot be added to nor subtracted from. I have not been convicted or declared bankrupt. By the Constitution, I am qualified to contest.

The only frightening aspect, and I want to allude to it, is this has to stop. If people attack the credibility of the President and he never said such things — because he believes in the rule of law — then why should people who claim to be supporters of the Governor say that “If there is No Alia, No Government, No Benue?”

The Reverend Fr. as Governor ought to be a man of peace. It is up to him to advise his supporters to respect the law to prevent any likelihood of breakdown of law and order in Benue State and Nigeria at large.

This thing is frightening. This is the flagship issue that we believe should be addressed quickly, because what happens in Benue can become dangerous.

What happened in 1962 and 1964 should never be allowed again in Nigeria, and it is not something the security agencies should take for granted.

So, that’s the only thing I will say about this for now. When the time comes, we will know about it. By law, the time for campaign has not started. Until then, as a law-abiding citizen, I will not talk further on that issue.

A prominent youth organization, the Youth Bureau, has lauded the Lagos State Government’s recent launch of a new registration exercise to capture poor and vulnerable households not previously included in its social welfare database.

The registration, which commenced at Ajibola Community Development Area (CDA) in Ikosi-Isheri Local Council Development Area (LCDA), Kosofe Local Government, is part of ongoing efforts of the Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu-led administration to reduce poverty and strengthen social protection programmes across the state.

In a statement signed by its Southern Coordinator, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, on Monday in Lagos, the Youth Bureau commended the governor’s exceptional leadership and compassion for the poor and vulnerable in the state, as well as his widely acknowledged drive for progressive governance and sustainable development.

Abdulrazaq described the deliberate move to include people who may have been left out of existing poverty alleviation programme as noble and heart-warming, noting that it takes only a leader who is sensitive to the plight of the poor and vulnerable under his jurisdiction.

He emphasised that registration is a key step in achieving our goal of targeted support for poor and vulnerable households, as the exercise will help identify those who may have been excluded in earlier phases.

His words: “We commend Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu for the administration’s commitment and sustained focus on social intervention amid harsh economic realities in the country.

“We are glad because of the visible dividends of democracy the initiative will bring. That’s why we are full of praise for Sanwo-Olu’s show of compassion towards the poor and vulnerable.

“At this point, what is needed of us as citizens is to support the Lagos Government led by Sanwo-Olu. We also want to convey this clear message to him and his officials of the people’s appreciation for the initiative, which drew large participation from residents of Lagos.

“Thank you, our able governor (Sanwo-Olu), and we commend you again for having the poor and vulnerable in your plans from the beginning of your administration to date. We assure you of our support in your quest to turn Nigeria’s commercial capital into one of the best places to live in the world,” the statement read in part.

Meanwhile, speaking at the flag-off of the fresh registration, the Director of the Social Protection Coordinating Department, Mrs. Oluwakemi Garbadeen-Adedeji—who represented the Permanent Secretary, Mrs. Olayinka Ojo—reaffirmed the state government’s commitment to reaching those in genuine need.

“This registration is a key step in achieving our goal of targeted support for poor and vulnerable households,” Garbadeen-Adedeji said, noting that the exercise will help identify those who may have been excluded in earlier phases.

The exercise builds upon the ongoing integration of the Lagos State Single Social Register (LASSR) with the National Identification Number (NIN), which began on April 9, 2025, across all 57 Local Government Areas and LCDAs.

LASSR, a subset of the National Social Register, is a key database used by the government to identify and support poor and vulnerable households in the state.

Ikechukwu Chukwunyere has been elected as the National President of the Bloggers and Vloggers Content Creators Association (BAVCCA) following the successful conduct of its highly anticipated 2025 National Elections in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, from Friday, August 22 to Sunday, August 24, 2025.

In a press release signed by Dr. Josephine Dung, the Chairman of the BAVCCA 2025 Convention, disclosed that over 2,000 accredited delegates from across Nigeria attended the elections. The voting was conducted both physically and online, marking a new chapter in the history of BAVCCA.

Mr. Ikechukwu Chukwunyere emerged victorious in a transparent and peaceful process, defeating his closest rival, Mr. Adedotun Fasanya, in a closely contested race. Demonstrating true sportsmanship, Mr. Fasanya congratulated Mr. Chukwunyere and pledged his support for the new leadership, urging all members to work together for the collective growth of the association.

Addressing delegates shortly after his victory, President-elect Ikechukwu Chukwunyere outlined his five-point agenda to reposition BAVCCA and consolidate its role as the voice of over 5,000 professional digital creators across Nigeria:

On Welfare and Capacity Building: Chukwunyere said he plans to “establish sustainable welfare schemes for members and introduce regular training programs to enhance digital skills, monetization opportunities, and global competitiveness.

Policy Advocacy: “Strengthen engagement with government, regulators, and stakeholders to protect the rights of content creators and influence policies that promote digital entrepreneurship.

Global Partnerships: “Foster international collaborations with global blogging, vlogging, and creative associations to open new frontiers for Nigerian content creators.

Technology and Innovation Hub: “Launch a BAVCCA digital innovation hub that will serve as a resource center for creators to access tools, mentorship, and funding opportunities.

Unity and Expansion: “Strengthen the bond among members nationwide and expand BAVCCA’s reach to ensure inclusivity, transparency, and accountability in all its activities.”

The newly elected President, Ikechukwu Chukwunyere, assured members that his administration would be people-centered, visionary, and focused on creating a strong legacy for the association.

• Alleges compromise by FCDA Executive Secretary and staff, using FCT Minister Nyesom Wike’s name to push reallocation for personal gain
• Urges Wike’s intervention as genuine allottee battles displacement despite ₦300m investment

The Integrity Advocacy for Development Initiative (IADI) has raised alarm over what it described as a plot by senior officials of the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) to hijack the Kafe Green Area in Abuja, despite a pending court case and huge investments already made by the original allottee.

In a statement issued on Sunday, the Executive Director of IADI, Christopher Ofomhi, disclosed that the land was duly allocated to BUNJOA Concept Ltd in 2007, with the company paying ground rent up until 2010.

According to him, the Department of Parks & Recreation confirmed the payments before an embargo was later placed on ground rent collection.
Ofomhi stated that the company had already spent about ₦300 million on compensation and statutory charges, only for the land to be dubiously reallocated by what he described as “corrupt successors of Bukus Achi,” the former Director of Parks & Recreation, allegedly for personal gain. He accused the current FCDA Executive Secretary and some staff members of compromising the process by hiding under the name of FCT Minister Nyesom Wike to push through a reallocation scheme designed to benefit private interests.

Despite the fact that the matter has been in court since 2022, with FCDA lawyers actively participating, Ofomhi revealed that a new company, Tegwa-Tegwanig Ltd, has now emerged, claiming it was engaged by the FCDA to develop a multi-event sports centre on the disputed site.

“This development raises serious questions. What has happened to the genuine allottee who followed due process and invested millions? Why does the FCDA appear to disregard judicial processes and the constitutional rights of Nigerians to own property anywhere in the country? And why is an Executive Secretary in such a hurry to displace the rightful owner without due process or fair compensation?” Ofomhi queried.

The civil society group alleged that some FCDA officials were hiding under the guise of a public project to appropriate the land for personal benefit. It warned that such acts of impunity undermine public trust in government institutions.

IADI therefore called on the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, the FCDA leadership, and other relevant authorities to urgently intervene and halt what it described as “the planned hijack of an innocent citizen’s land.”

“Land administration in Abuja must not be reduced to a playground for corruption. Due process must be respected, the courts must be allowed to decide, and citizens must be protected from exploitation,” Ofomhi stressed.

Concluding the statement, IADI emphasized that the matter transcends the interest of one company, describing it as a litmus test for governance credibility and the rule of law in Nigeria.

“As civil society, we cannot stand aloof while a dangerous culture of impunity takes root in the heart of the nation’s capital. If judicial pronouncements and due process are ignored in Abuja, then what hope do ordinary Nigerians have in other parts of the country?” Ofomhi asked.

The group further appealed to the Director General of the State Security Service (DGSS) to prevail on the FCT DSS to conclude its ongoing investigation into the Parks & Recreation Department and ensure that all those found culpable face justice, noting that this will serve as a deterrent to others.

The group also warned that it was prepared, alongside allied civil society organizations, to escalate the matter through lawful civic action, including peaceful demonstrations and public advocacy, until justice is achieved.

“We will stand firmly on the side of justice. This is not just about land, it is about whether Nigerians can trust their government to protect rights and respect the courts. No one is above the law, and we will not relent until accountability prevails,” IADI declared.