$4 Billion Refinery Fraud: Protesters Storm ICPC Headquarters, Call for Probe of MSM Group’s Connection to Missing Funds

Hundreds of protesters, led by the Concerned Lawyers and Citizens Network (CLCN), stormed the headquarters of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) in Abuja on Thursday demanding an immediate investigation into what they described as a massive $4 billion fraud involving the MSM Group and missing funds meant for Nigeria’s refinery rehabilitation.

In a speech delivered by Sambari G. Benjamin, Esq., the CLCN accused the MSM Group, a conglomerate with ties to Engineer Mele Kolo Kyari, former Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), of being a front for laundering stolen public funds.

The group pointed to the mysterious disappearance of $2.896 billion allocated for the rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries, which remain non-functional despite the massive investment.

“We are here because something is deeply wrong,” Benjamin declared to a crowd of supporters and journalists.

“MSM Group is not just a business; it is a vessel of money laundering, a shell of secrecy, and a front for repurposing stolen public funds.”

The CLCN highlighted MSM Group’s recent $2.4 billion deal with the Kebbi State Government to build a cement plant, questioning the source of the funds and the company’s sudden emergence in industries ranging from oil and gas to cement and agriculture.

The protesters raised concerns about a conflict of interest, noting that a former bank account officer of Kyari is now a director at MSM Group, and the conglomerate has refused to disclose its investors or funding sources.

“How did MSM Group secure $2.4 billion with no prior footprint in cement?” Benjamin asked.

“Why do these funds correspond with the missing money meant for our refineries? This is not coincidence. This is corruption with a family name.”

The protesters demanded that the ICPC launch a full-scale investigation into MSM Group’s financial operations, uncover its links to Kyari’s tenure at NNPCL, expose its investors and directors, and recover every kobo diverted from the refinery funds.

They also called for accountability for all individuals involved, regardless of their influence.

“We speak for the mechanic in Kaduna, the mother in Warri, and the youth in Port Harcourt who have been robbed of opportunity, dignity, and truth,” Benjamin said.

“This is about justice and restoring faith in our institutions.”

The CLCN vowed to continue their agitation until the truth is revealed and justice is served, warning that Nigerians will not be silenced or intimidated.

“Let this day be remembered as the moment Nigerians stood up and said: Enough is enough with the theft of our commonwealth,” Benjamin concluded.

China, U.S. reach basic framework consensus on resolving issues related to TikTok

By Xu Hailin, Han Shuo, Yan Huan, People’s Daily

China and the United States reached a basic framework consensus on resolving issues related to TikTok through cooperation, reducing investment barriers and promoting relevant economic and trade cooperation, said Li Chenggang, China international trade representative with the Ministry of Commerce and vice-minister of commerce.
On Sept. 14 and 15, the Chinese and U.S. delegations convened talks on economic and trade issues in Madrid, Spain. Li said on a press briefing hosted by the Chinese delegation after the talks that during the past two days, the two sides have actively implemented the important consensus reached by the heads of state of the two countries in their phone call, fully leveraged the China-U.S. trade consultation mechanism, and engaged in candid, in-depth and constructive communication based on mutual respect and equal consultation regarding economic and trade issues of mutual concern, including TikTok.
Regarding the TikTok issue, China has always opposed politicization, instrumentalization and weaponization of technology as well as economic and trade matters, and will never seek to reach any agreement at the expense of principles, interests of companies, or international fairness and justice, Li said.
China will firmly safeguard the national interests, the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises, and carry out technology export approval in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Li said, adding that the Chinese government also fully respects the will of enterprises and supports them in conducting business negotiations on an equal footing in accordance with market principles.
At the press briefing, Wang Jingtao, deputy director of the Cyberspace Administration of China, said both sides reached a basic consensus regarding the full respect for the will of the business as well as the law of the market on resolving the TikTok issue through such methods as the entrusted operation of TikTok’s U.S. user data and content security business, and the license for use of the algorithm and other intellectual property rights.
The Chinese government will examine and approve relevant matters involving TikTok, such as the technology export and the license use of intellectual property, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, Wang added.
The Chinese government has always firmly safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese-funded enterprises and encouraged them to actively explore and develop abroad, he said.
China hopes that the U.S. side, based on the consensus reached, could provide an open, fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in the United States, including TikTok, thus contributing to the stable, healthy and sustainable development of China-U.S. economic and trade relations, he said.
The reason why the Chinese side agreed to a consensus is because, based on its assessment, China has come to the judgment that such a consensus is in their mutual interest, Li said. Through discussions on the TikTok issue, the two sides further recognized that a stable China-U.S. economic and trade relationship is of great significance to both countries.
Both sides will continue to maintain close communication, discuss the details of the relevant outcome documents, and each will go through the domestic approval procedures, Li added.
Li said the Chinese side has noted that the U.S. side is still continuously expanding sanctions against Chinese entities after a series of economic and trade consultations between the two countries.
Li said that the United States has overstretched the concept of national security, and continuously expanded the list of sanctions against Chinese entities, with its long arm of jurisdiction reaching ever farther, which are a typical act of unilateral bullying that violates international law and the basic norms governing international relations.
China firmly opposes this, and raised serious concerns to the U.S. side during the talks, Li added.
The U.S. side cannot, on the one hand, ask China to take care of U.S. concerns, and on the other hand, continuously suppress Chinese enterprises, he said, adding that China urges the United States to correct its mistakes, lift these restrictions as soon as possible, and work with China to jointly safeguard the hard-won achievements of China-U.S. economic and trade consultations, so as to promote the healthy, stable and sustainable development of bilateral economic and trade relations.
Li also expressed his gratitude to Spain for its support and hospitality in hosting the China-U.S. economic and trade talks.

Slow-traffic systems sprouting across China, making cities more livable

By Wang Haonan, Yang Yanfei, Shen Jingran, People’s Daily

Active transportation – whether through leisurely walks or eco-friendly cycling – has become an increasingly popular choice in Chinese cities. Urban “slow-traffic systems,” defined as non-motorized networks prioritizing walking and cycling, are expanding nationwide with locally tailored designs. These systems enhance urban livability while reducing environmental impact.
At dawn in Beijing, traffic on the Second Ring Road began to pick up. Nearby, 63-year-old Zhang Jianguo, who lives in Andingmen in Dongcheng district, started his morning exercise on a greenway along the road. “This path makes both exercise and daily travel so much easier,” he said. The 35.5-kilometer corridor, fully opened last year, connects parks, heritage sites, and commercial districts like an emerald ribbon encircling the city.
By 2024, walking and cycling accounted for 50.1% of trips in Beijing, with bicycles representing 20%. The city has constructed 60.6 kilometers of segregated bike lanes and widened 329.9 kilometers of existing routes.
“The optimal solution for short-distance travel and transit connections,” notes Wang Shuling of the Beijing Transport Institute. “They’re also vital for reducing transport emissions.” Wang emphasizes that well-planned systems – ensuring safety, continuity, and dedicated spaces for pedestrians, cyclists, and vehicles – boost overall urban mobility efficiency.
On Beijing’s first bicycle-only expressway (6.5 km linking Huilongguan to Zhongguancun), commuters like Mr. Zhang report: “Travel time dropped from one hour to under 30 minutes. Dedicated lanes make cycling faster than buses and less stressful than driving.”
At 6 am in Nanchang, capital of east China’s Jiangxi province, cycling enthusiast Wang Qing set off from beneath the Yingxiong Bridge and pedaled along a greenway by the Ganjiang River. “Previously I cycled in suburbs – now scenic routes like Fenghuangzhou Park and Qiushui Square are minutes from home,” he says. Honggutan District’s 28-kilometer integrated trail system – featuring rest stations and segregated paths – has transformed the riverside into an ecological retreat elevating residents’ quality of life.
Through interconnected trails, smart facilities, and open green spaces, Nanchang has unified parks, cultural landmarks, and wetlands into a cohesive “lifestyle belt” where citizens exercise amidst nature.
In Yuzhong district, Chongqing municipality in southwest China, a woman surnamed Chen took a short walk along a local slow-traffic system to reach Jiukengzi wet market. “I used to take a big detour to buy groceries. Now it’s just a few steps away!” she said with a smile.
In a mountainous city like Chongqing, walking has never been simple. Differences in elevation and winding roads mean public spaces are often scattered. In recent years, Chongqing has fully tapped into its local topography to develop high-quality slow-traffic systems. Using the city’s signature hillside trails, it has linked communities, parks, schools, and metro stations into a network. To date, more than 840 kilometers of hillside trails have been built in downtown area, forming a multi-functional system that is interconnected, convenient, efficient, and accessible to people of all ages.
In Chongqing’s Daijiaxiang, trails have even reshaped the community’s social and economic landscape. Along the winding stone steps, more than 40 cafes, cultural shops, and bookstores have sprung up, reviving the once quiet neighborhood. With annual output exceeding 100 million yuan ($14.05 million), this is not only a commercial revival but also a community rebirth.
“Trails are not just pathways. They connect people’s daily routines, commercial activities, and cultural memories. Our goal is to revitalize communities through trails and promote integration through slow travel,” said Tang Baijun, director of Yuzhong district’s key project construction affairs center.

Group Lauds Sanwo-Olu For Wooing Global Investors In Atlanta

Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State has been praised for his recent outing in the United States, where he delivered a compelling message, selling the nation’s commercial capital to global investors.

It will be recalled that Sanwo-Olu led the Nigerian delegation and told participants at the U.S.-Nigeria Policy and Trade Forum, held alongside FNITCC-AFRICON 2025 at the Georgia State Capitol, Atlanta, last Friday, that Lagos wants to work with Georgia to create sister-city frameworks to connect Atlanta and Lagos more deliberately.

Speaking during the event, Sanwo-Olu told the global audience that “Lagos is not just open for business — it is actively seeking global partnerships that can shape the future of urban and economic development across Africa.”

He invited investors to Lagos, emphasizing shared opportunities in trade, tech, and culture, and calling the Nigerian diaspora a vital bridge for innovation and partnerships.

Reflecting on Sanwo-Olu’s Atlanta outing, a coalition of Human Rights Fighters, CHRF, revealed that the governor made them proud as he showed great ability to adequately market the state and Nigeria to global investors, describing him as a “great marketer of the state and Nigeria as a whole”.

The Coalition made this known in a statement signed by its National President, Emeka Pascal in Lagos on Wednesday.

Pascal called on the Governor to further ensure there is a thorough follow-up in order to bring all the projections to reality. Adding that the governor has continued to show capacity in and outside the shores of Nigeria, an attribute he urged other leaders to emulate.

“First, let me state unequivocally that we as Lagosians have never doubted the abilities of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu. We trust his ability, and we know he has the capacity to deliver at any level.

“We commend Sanwo-Olu for showcasing Lagos to the world; his display in Atlanta was refreshing, and as a group, we welcome it. He’s a great salesman of Lagos and Nigeria as a whole, and we as a group think he deserves Commendations.

“Beyond the conference, we also call for follow-up on potential investors and for every deal hanging to be sealed. We also urge other State governors and leaders to seize every opportunity to put the nation in a good light. So, Leaders must begin to emulate people like the Lagos State Governor for our subnational level to make it bigger,” he advised.

Kebbi violence: Why Malami and Koko Have Cases to Answer

Hundreds of protesters, led by the Concerned Lawyers and Citizens Network (CLCN), stormed the headquarters of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) in Abuja on Thursday demanding an immediate investigation into what they described as a massive $4 billion fraud involving the MSM Group and missing funds meant for Nigeria’s refinery rehabilitation.

In a speech delivered by Sambari G. Benjamin, Esq., the CLCN accused the MSM Group, a conglomerate with ties to Engineer Mele Kolo Kyari, former Group Managing Director of the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL), of being a front for laundering stolen public funds.

The group pointed to the mysterious disappearance of $2.896 billion allocated for the rehabilitation of the Port Harcourt, Warri, and Kaduna refineries, which remain non-functional despite the massive investment.

“We are here because something is deeply wrong,” Benjamin declared to a crowd of supporters and journalists.

“MSM Group is not just a business; it is a vessel of money laundering, a shell of secrecy, and a front for repurposing stolen public funds.”

The CLCN highlighted MSM Group’s recent $2.4 billion deal with the Kebbi State Government to build a cement plant, questioning the source of the funds and the company’s sudden emergence in industries ranging from oil and gas to cement and agriculture.

The protesters raised concerns about a conflict of interest, noting that a former bank account officer of Kyari is now a director at MSM Group, and the conglomerate has refused to disclose its investors or funding sources.

“How did MSM Group secure $2.4 billion with no prior footprint in cement?” Benjamin asked.

“Why do these funds correspond with the missing money meant for our refineries? This is not coincidence. This is corruption with a family name.”

The protesters demanded that the ICPC launch a full-scale investigation into MSM Group’s financial operations, uncover its links to Kyari’s tenure at NNPCL, expose its investors and directors, and recover every kobo diverted from the refinery funds.

They also called for accountability for all individuals involved, regardless of their influence.

“We speak for the mechanic in Kaduna, the mother in Warri, and the youth in Port Harcourt who have been robbed of opportunity, dignity, and truth,” Benjamin said.

“This is about justice and restoring faith in our institutions.”

The CLCN vowed to continue their agitation until the truth is revealed and justice is served, warning that Nigerians will not be silenced or intimidated.

“Let this day be remembered as the moment Nigerians stood up and said: Enough is enough with the theft of our commonwealth,” Benjamin concluded.

By Iliasu Idris

The recent invasion of our beloved town by notorious bandits that reverberates through the streets of Birnin Kebbi has become an interesting focus of national security. Nigeria is witnessing an unfortunate realization where political machinations have not merely collided with public safety but have precipitated a catastrophe of unprecedented magnitude. The rumors of violence and insecurity in Kebbi state, in particular, open cans of questions that go beyond just governance; questions that demand the swift re-examination of the very nature of political power and the deadly relationship it has with terrorism. This surge in insecurity has been largely attributed to the rise of bandits that terrorize rural communities and farmers alike. But this does not occur in a vacuum.

On the aforementioned, it is discovered that a thorough investigation into the activities of the likes of Abubakar Malami, the former Attorney General of the Federation, and Shehu Koko, a former lawmaker from our beloved state reveals a disquieting reality: These individuals have cases to answer, and the stakes could not be higher. It is important to note that the violence plaguing Kebbi state isn’t the consequence of poor governance or the weakness of its security architecture— what Nigerians are witnessing is a direct result of a political conspiracy; politicians playing the deadly game of turning banditry into a political tool for vested interests.

To understand the level of this danger better, it would be appropriate to look into the personalities of these two notorious political figures. It’s still on record that Nigerians experienced a dark season marked by a series of legal and political controversies under the tenure of Abubakar Malami as Nigeria’s Attorney General. His role in matters of national security and his relationship with powerful political and economic forces was a dictatorial burden of suppression on National growth and transparency. Therefore, the news of bringing things into Kebbi didn’t come as a surprise, but only warrants the closest scrutiny, to unravel the deep desperation of Malami’s political ambition, and expose him to the good people of Nigeria who think that Malami has changed. But unfortunately, a leopard can never change its spots.

Moreover, the action of Muhammed Shehu Koko involvement is equally troubling to know. Koko is a former House of Representatives member for Koko/Maiyama Federal Constituency, and he was suspended by the APC in May 2025 alongside nine others for alleged anti-party activities, disloyalty, and harassment of party executives. Before he wormed his way into politics, he was known for hiring bandits to terrorise rivals. Now, he’s found a willing partner in Malami, who’s using his legal clout to shield Koko from his corruption trial. His transition from a legislator to a suspected bandit sponsor is what we can call, the corrosive influence of power and ambition within Nigeria’s politics.

According to verified sources, Malami allegedly provided Koko with $1 million to bankroll the bandits and terrorists, with explicit instructions to “resume work” in Kebbi by launching attacks to create panic and discredit Idris’s governance. According to a former ally of Koko, who was part of the plot but later opted out, he revealed that Koko pocketed most of the funds out of greed, releasing only $100,000 to the bandits with a promise of more “once they resumed work in Kebbi.” This betrayal made the ally leaked the details to authorities, thereby exposing Koko’s evil plan. In frantic efforts to shield Koko from scrutiny, and taking his failed plan off the center stage, Malami launched a desperate campaign to divert attention from his crimes. On the 10th of September, Malami filed a petition to the National Security Adviser, Inspector General of Police, DSS, and other agencies, falsely accusing Governor Idris of importing “foreign mercenaries” and arming terrorists.

Malami’s shabby master plan is to bring in criminal elements to destabilize Kebbi, thereby creating a climate of fear and discontent that could potentially bolster his political ambitions, by creating the ground to project himself as a savior. It is disturbing to comprehend this chilling allegation in reality, because, importing bandits into Kebbi is not an accident of political ambition gone awry, it is an intentional act of calculated destruction that is meant to serve personal interests at the cost of human lives. Evidently, Malami’s alleged orchestration in this deadly game of politics puts the safety of the entire nation in jeopardy.

The embittered duo( Malami and Koko), who are defunct members of the APC and now prominent figures in the African Democratic Congress (ADC), have imported notorious bandits and thugs to wreak havoc in the state, revealing a sordid pact rooted in political desperation and criminal collusion. It can be recalled that this duo’s defection was fueled by their rejection by Kebbi’s political mainstream, prompting them to resort to thuggery and violence to intimidate opponents and assert dominance, as it’s no secret that Koko has a long history of thuggery.

However, upon keen observation of their theatrics, it is revealed that their desire for control often overrides the sanctity of human life. They believed that engineering the destabilization of Kebbi could very well weaken the influence of political opponents, thereby creating a crisis that would allow them ( Malami and Koko) to present themselves as the solution; a plan which is now evidently playing out in the open, and this is not a new tactic in Nigerian politics. What makes this particular situation in Kebbi a very disturbing one is the high profile of the individuals allegedly involved. A successful execution of this plot would see to another rise of another uncontrolled group of bandits that might seek to further terrorize the peace of the state with the supposed backing and sponsorship of powerful political individuals.

The country’s failure to address such systemic issues has led to a situation where the powerful are often immune from justice, while the most vulnerable bear the brunt of their machinations. The very fact that such claims which is backed by eyewitness testimony and public reports exist, indicates the porosity of accountability at the highest levels. How can a nation that touts itself as a democracy, a place where the rule of law is paramount, allow such individuals to operate with impunity?

Presently, one cannot help but feel a deep sense of disillusionment with the happenings in Kebbi. The lives of ordinary Nigerians have become pawns in a brutal game played by the elite. We are not only witnessing a case of negligence that ought to have been taken seriously, but a deliberate execution of violence for personal gain, and the people of Nigeria deserve answers right now. As rightly noted, the dynamics of violence are not only the product of criminal opportunism that weren’t prevented very early, but are being actively orchestrated by powerful figures within Nigeria’s political elite.

Mr President and every patriotic individual must not see Kebbi’s suffering as a local issue; it must be seen as an emblem of a larger crisis that threatens the very foundation of the Nigerian state. Notably, Malami and Koko are in a political lab, preparing violence that might spin out of control, which might metamorphose into another national catastrophe. It is irrefutable that this is how Boko-haram was birthed; initially emerged as a seemingly harmless entity but has since evolved into a formidable and ferocious force that has become hard to totally eradicate. What Malami failed to understand is that, just like other nations plagued by terrorism, it all start with a small group of paid machineries that were used by selfish individuals like himself to cause mayhem, but overtime, with the confidence that they are backed by powerful individuals, they grew in numbers, expanded their territory and ultimately becoming uncontrollable and morphing into international terrorist organizations.

Without mincing words, Malami and Koko have cases to answer, not only for the plot of violence they are orchestrating in Kebbi, but for the larger question of political responsibility and ethical governance in Nigeria. The preservation of the countless lives that may be lost to this senseless plot of Malami and Koko must not be ignored. The Inspector General of Police, DSS, and other agencies must call them in for questioning.

Nigeria’s future is in grave jeopardy if Malami and Koko are not thoroughly investigated.

Idris wrote this piece from Kebbi State..

₦75 per litre coastal freight cost demand self-serving, Coalition blasts DAPPMAN

Coalition of Civil Society Organisations in Nigeria (COCSON) and Nigerian Interfaith Forum (NIF) on Friday accused the Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN) of seeking to exploit citizens and plunge the nation back into subsidy fraud.

According to the civil society groups, DAPPMAN’s demand of ₦75 per litre for coastal freight and ops cost, translating to ₦1.505 trillion, is self-serving and nothing but greed. While calling on President Bola Tinubu’s administration to beam its searchlight on DAPPMAN, as the activities are undermining local refining, sabotaging Dangote Refinery from the start and threatening the Federal Government’s Reform Agenda.

The CSOs made this known in a statement jointly signed by Comrade Ibrahim Suleiman and Mrs. Grace Okonkwo, President and National Secretary of COCSON, respectively; As well as Rev. Dr. Matthew Ayodele and Imam Musa Abdullahi, National Chairman and Secretary of NIF, respectively, in Abuja.

The concerns raised by the group were accompanied by a protest march in the nation’s capital on Friday, September 26, 2025.

While backing the Dangote Refinery’s genuine efforts in transforming the Petroleum Industry, the groups vowed to file a suit against DAPPMAN in the Federal High Court for economic sabotage, conspiracy, and deliberate attempt to reintroduce subsidy through the backdoor.

The statement reads: “We condemn the shameful attempt by the Depot and Petroleum Products Marketers Association of Nigeria (DAPPMAN) to blackmail Nigerians into paying a backdoor subsidy of ₦1.505 trillion annually.

“This demand is not just outrageous; it is treachery against the Nigerian people. It is economic sabotage disguised as business.

“At such a critical time, for DAPPMAN to demand that Nigerians underwrite their inefficiencies with ₦1.5 trillion yearly is nothing but wickedness. It would rob our hospitals of funding, deny schools resources, cripple infrastructure development, and keep our nation shackled to poverty. This is not subsidy — it is extortion.”

On why DAPPMAN must be checked by the government, the groups maintained that the body had become a national threat.

“They Undermine Local Refining: Dangote Refinery has exported over 3.2 million metric tonnes of refined products in three months, proving capacity. Meanwhile, DAPPMAN imported 3.6 million metric tonnes, promoting dumping and sabotaging Nigeria’s economy.

“They Sabotaged Dangote from the Start: When Dangote Refinery was completed, the refinery had over 500 million litres of products in stock, and Dangote himself had to plead publicly with NNPC, marketers, and transporters to patronize him. Instead, they deliberately imported products from abroad to frustrate his operations.

“Faced with this sabotage, Dangote was forced to buy over 4,000 trucks to enter the oil transport sector. Who pushed him into this? Not Nigerians, but the very marketers and transporters now crying foul.

“Today, these same actors accuse him of chasing them out of the market to create a monopoly. Where is the monopoly?

“They abandoned him, tried to strangle his refinery, and left him no option but to strategize for survival. If they are not careful, he may enter retailing, and then he will fully integrate production, transport, and retail. That is not a monopoly; that is resilience and strategy in the face of cartel sabotage.

“They Threaten Tinubu’s Reform Agenda: Entertaining such demands would roll back the government’s courageous removal of fuel subsidy and tarnish Nigeria’s international credibility.

“Fellow Nigerians, this is not just a fight for Dangote Refinery. This is a fight for Nigeria’s future. This is a battle between nation-builders and nation-wreckers, between patriots and profiteers, between hope and despair.

“DAPPMAN’s demand for ₦1.505 trillion subsidy is a declaration of war on the Nigerian people. Our response is clear: we will resist, we will mobilise, we will litigate, and we will not rest until this cartel is defeated.

“We urge the Federal Government to stand firm, Nigerians to stand united, and Dangote Refinery to stand strong. Together, we will ensure that no group, no cartel, and no vested interest will derail Nigeria’s refining revolution.”

President Tinubu’s Birthday Message to Senator Saliu Mustapha

I extend my warm felicitations to Senator Saliu Mustapha @RealMallamSaliu, the Turaki of Ilorin Emirate and the Aare Atunluse of Oro-Ago Kingdom, on his birthday.
 
In his service to our nation, Senator Mustapha has exemplified the virtues of humility, loyalty, and dedication. As Senator representing Kwara Central and Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Production Services, and Rural Development, he has brought to bear his passion for food security and agricultural transformation, sponsoring and advancing impactful legislation that speaks to the future of our great country.
 
In just two years in the Senate, he has distinguished himself as one of the bright lights of the legislature, a loyal party man, a team player, and a role model for the younger generation of leaders who seek inspiration in selfless service and commitment to the common good.
 
As he marks his birthday today, I join his family, friends, associates, and the people of Kwara Central in celebrating him. I wish him renewed strength, wisdom, and good health for years of fruitful service to the nation.
 
Happy birthday, Turaki.
 
Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR
President & Commander-in-Chief,
Federal Republic of Nigeria
September 25, 2025

Centre for Crises Communication

His Excellency,
Sir Siminalayi Fubara
Executive Governor of Rivers State
Government House, Port Harcourt
Rivers State.

Dear sir,

LETTER OF FELICITATION

The Management and Staff of the Centre for Crisis Communication (organisers of the Niger Delta Heroes Award 2025) heartily felicitate with you on your graceful return to office following the expiration of the state of emergency.

Your candour, calm disposition, and exemplary leadership throughout the challenging period stand as a true testament to your noble character and statesmanship. We are indeed proud to be associated with you.

As you resume the mandate freely entrusted to you by the good people of Rivers State, we wish you continued success, wisdom, and strength in the service of your people.

Congratulations, Sir.

Yours sincerely,

Chief Dressman Darlinton-Gbolobofa
Chairman, South-South Zone

Disambiguating Jurisdictional Boundaries of Federal and State Governments in Electricity Regulation

By Emmanuel Ukera, Esq

The enactment of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN),1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 and the Electricity Act, 2023 which paved way for full devolution of intra-state electricity regulatory powers to state governments have stirred up a lot of contestations amongst stakeholders than ever imagined.

The bone of contention appears rooted in the misconception amongst stakeholders regarding the extent of the regulatory powers available to state governments under the current multitier regulatory regime recognized by the CFRN (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 and the EA,2023. One of such misconceptions which has gained traction in the media is that the recent constitutional alteration and the consequent enactment of the EA, 2023 have for the first time devolved electricity regulatory powers to sub-nationals to the extent that the newly established State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) can now regulate ( in all its ramifications), electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities within state boundaries to the exclusion of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission ( NERC), which hitherto regulated electricity activities nationwide.

Relatedly, there are those who are of the strong opinion that under the current legal regime, power plants located within state boundaries should fall under the overriding regulatory powers of SERCs including full takeover and control of the eight (8) power plants now operated by the eight successor generating companies (GENCOs) that emerged after the conclusion of privatization in 2013.

It has also been argued that the EA,2023, is an iniquitous and needless piece of legislation which has abolished cross-subsidization and provided the framework for promotion of energy inequalities especially considering the disproportionate distribution of electricity infrastructure between the northern and southern states of Nigeria.

The instant intervention seeks to disambiguate the jurisdictional boundaries of the SERCs and NERC under the current legal regime and shed light on recent debates.

To fully understand the jurisdictional confines of the two levels of governments regarding electricity regulation in Nigeria, it must be stated that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) and the Electricity Act, 2023 constitute the primary sources of electricity law in Nigeria currently. Furthermore, there are other federal enactments that must be taken into consideration when discussing the regulatory powers of the two levels of government.

These include the Standard Organization of Nigeria (Establishment)Act which is the general legislation on national technical standards; Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission Act which is the general legislation on competition, consumer protection, and anti-trust; Climate Change Act ,2021 which deals with climate change mitigation and adaptation bearing in mind Nigeria’s international commitment to climate change; Water Resources Act, CAP W2, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN) ,2004 which regulates the planning, development and use of water resources that affects more than one state; National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (Establishment) Act; and the Environmental Impact Assessment Act, CAP.E12, LFN,2004 which are relevant in the area of environmental impact of electricity projects or related activities in the power sector. Additionally, licensed electricity entities operating under the regulatory purview of state regulators are expected to comply with extant federal enactments on company income tax, personal income tax and value added tax etc .

The above, amongst others constitute the gamut of laws that are critical in disambiguating the legislative and regulatory competences of the two levels of government in Nigeria on the issue of electricity and should be well understood by key players in the power sector.

With respect to the powers of the two levels of government under the Constitution, one must recall that prior to 1999, the business of electricity generation, transmission and distribution was for decades under the sole control of the defunct National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) as a vertically integrated monopoly.

The defunct NEPA operated a redial national grid system comprising of on-grid power plants, high voltage transmission lines and distribution lines through which electricity albeit epileptically was supplied to Nigerian nationwide without regard to geographic boundaries of state governments.

This integrated high voltage system of interconnected generation plants, transmission lines, substations and related facilities crisscrossing states of the Federation and beyond that was operated by NEPA as a unified network is what is essentially referred to as the national grid system.

However, following the promulgation of the CFRN,1999, electric power was included as an item on the concurrent list. In this regard, item F, paragraphs 13,14, and 15, Part II, Second Schedule to the CFRN,1999 (“the Constitution”) defined the legislative competence of the respective levels of government regarding electricity.

The implication of the aforementioned constitutional provisions is that, since 1999, state governments were at liberty to invest in electricity within their domains including the power to set up of state grids and regulate intra-state electricity where they possess the wherewithal. No state government took advantage of this constitutional provision either due to lack of the political will or some other inexplicable reasons.

It is, however, important to note that prior to constitutional alteration in 2023, the powers of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on intra-state electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities was greatly impeded by the restriction under paragraph 14 (b), Part II, Second Schedule to the Constitution “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State”.

It was this restrictive phrase “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State” that was essentially deleted through the enactment of the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023. According to the long title to the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No,17) Act,2023, the constitutional alteration was intended to “allow states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity in areas covered by the national grid”…. What is apparent from the foregoing is that it is not correct to say that the CFRN,1999, (Fifth Alteration) Act (No.17) Act,2023 for the first time transferred “electric power” from the exclusive list to the concurrent list as it is often reported in some sections of the media. Electric power was an item in the concurrent list to the CFRN 1999 and remains so even after the said constitutional alteration of 2023.

What the CFRN,1999 (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 did is to simply delete the inhibitive words “to areas not covered by the national grid system within that State” to allow state governments legislate on and regulate intra-state electricity activities and most fundamentally “generate, transmit and distribute electricity in areas covered by the national grid” as expressly stated in the long title.

In other words, the constitutional alteration was not aimed at empowering state governments to embark on far reaching regulatory measures that would conflict or undermine the regulatory powers of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) such as taking over NERC licensed on-grid power plants, setting tariffs or slashing tariffs for electricity procured through the National Wholesale Electricity Market(NWEN) or regulation of other activities on the national grid .

The constitutional alteration was primarily intended to promote investments within state boundaries without being inhibited by the presence of the national grid or component of it within such state boundaries.

In simple terms, by virtue of this constitutional alteration, state governments can now embark on embedded generation, mini-grids, licensing and regulation of independent electricity distribution networks (IEDNs) and independent electricity distribution network operators (IEDNOs), and even set up state grid even if such activities have bearing on the national grid.

Unfortunately, most state governments have since focused on issuing controversial regulatory measures that will throw the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry (NESI) in disarray and put the state regulators at cross-purposes with NERC instead of taking initiatives that will boost investments and ultimately improve electricity access to their citizens, the latter being the primary intendment of the constitutional alteration.

Furthermore, the powers of state governments to legislate on and regulate intra-state electricity activities without being inhibited by the presence of the national grid as recognized by the CFRN (Fifth Alteration) (No.17) Act,2023 must be understood against the preeminence powers of the federal government to ” make laws for the Federation or any part thereof with respect to — electricity and establishment of electric power stations, generation and transmission, damming of water for electricity generation, cross-border electricity trading and distribution, promotion and establishment of the national grid system, regulation of right of any person to use, work, operate any plant, apparatus, equipment or work designed for the supply or use of electrical energy as provided under paragraph 13 (a)(b)(c)(d)(e)and(f) part II, Second Schedule to the Constitution all of which remains unaffected by the recent constitutional alteration.

The implication is that it will amount to constitutional infraction for any state government to set or approve parallel technical standards and operational codes or set up an agency for enforcement of technical standards under the guise exercising intra-state electricity regulatory powers.

Similarly, while state governments are at liberty to invest around the national grid presence within their state boundaries, in deference to the powers of the federal Government to regulate the national grid system as indicated above, any investment around the national grid including activities, transactions and services that have bearing on the national grid system will still require the authorization (not license) of NERC before such can legally take place. Such activities, transactions and services that will require NERC authorization may include : interconnection to, injection into, wheeling of electricity over, withdrawal of electricity from the national grid; sale and purchase of electricity, the delivery of which requires the use of the national grid; provision and receipt of ancillary services to or from the national grid; use of metering, control, dispatch and other systems required by the Grid Code for interconnection and wheeling services etc.

The law is trite, the apex court has held in the case of **AG. Ogun State v.Aberuagba &Ors (1985)LPELR-3164** that the powers of state governments to legislate on matters in the concurrent list to the Constitution is limited by the constitutional doctrines inconsistency and covering the field.

One other issue that requires clarification here is the claim in some quarters that the EA,2023, is an iniquitous and needless piece of legislation which has abolished cross-subsidization and provided the framework for promotion of energy inequalities. This is an erroneous impression borne out of lack proper understanding of the objectives, principles and rigorous processes that culminated into the enactment of the EA,2023.

To begin with, the issue of cross-subsidization was introduced through the Power Consumer Assistance Fund (PCAF) and first given statutory recognition under the Electric Power Sector Reform Act,2005 (now repealed) but retained under part XV of the EA,2023.

However, with the full decentralization of electricity including policy matters, the framework for subsidy administration in the NESI is currently undergoing review in the National Assembly bearing in mind the need to allow for the two levels of government to take independent policy decisions on matters of electricity subsidy and also determine fairly, which categories of electricity consumers should bear the brunt of cross subsidization under the current multitier electricity industry.

It must also be added that the Electricity Act,2023 is not a framework for promotion of energy inequalities but was introduced following a rigorous stakeholder engagement including the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF) to replace the EPSRA,2005, the latter being a reform legislation that became unsuitable for the next phase of the electricity market after conclusion of the privatization exercise in 2013.One of the key features of the EA,2023 as a compelling framework for addressing energy inequalities is the provision of Section 110 which imposes an obligation on NERC to ensure fair spread of transmission and other electricity infrastructure across the country. Similarly, the EA,2023 for the first time made provision for integrated resource planning and leveraging on this provision the Federal Executive Council recently approved the National Integrated Electricity Policy and Implementation Plan,2024 which takes into consideration the peculiar strengths and weaknesses of the various state governments. It is expected that state governments will take advantage of this paradigm shift that recognizes a robust role for wind,biomas, solar and other renewable sources of energy in addressing perceived or existing energy inequalities.

From the foregoing, it can be safely concluded that the current legal regime for regulation electricity in Nigeria as articulated above leaves no room for confusion or controversy. With about 14 states already enjoying regulatory autonomy within their respective state boundaries, NERC should focus on regulation of the NWEN and activities on the national grid system while states should focus on retail activities within their respective boundaries without encroaching on the jurisdiction of NERC.

The primary focus of state governments at this stage of the market should be to adopt state integrated electricity policies and plans that will among other things leverage on potentials for generation and consumption of electricity from renewable sources such as wind, solar and biomass and as a priority integrate a large number of big self-generation consumers into the emerging state markets. A robust plan for integration of self-generation consumers into the nascent state electricity markets can in the short and medium terms be achieved through embedded generation, issuance of licenses for IEDNs/IEDNOs and mini-grids etc.

The Federal Government through the Ministry of power should equally fast track and streamline ongoing transmission and distribution upgrades under the auspices of FGN Power to allow for efficient evacuation of generated power across state boundaries where such states are in position to execute bilaterals that recognize NERC tariffs. State governments should avoid toying with the idea of unstructured tariffs which has left the National Wholesale Electricity Market in crippling debts.

The weakest links in the Nigerian power value chain today remains the transmission and distribution segments and with concerted efforts being made by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu,GCFR to settle legacy debts owed GENCOs, radical actions need to be taken to conclude ongoing upgrade of the transmission and distribution assets for operational and financial synergy along the national grid.


Barrister Ukera, Esq can be reached on emmauks@yahoo.com

China issues its first central document on carbon market development

By Kou Jiangze, People’s Daily

The carbon market is a crucial policy instrument for leveraging market mechanisms to address climate change and accelerate the transition toward a green, low-carbon economy.

In a significant step toward strengthening the nation’s commitment to climate action, China has unveiled a guideline to accelerate the country’s green and low-carbon transition and strengthen the construction of the national carbon trading market.

This document represents the first central government document dedicated to the carbon market, providing robust institutional frameworks and enhanced capacity-building support. The goal is to cultivate a more effective, dynamic, and internationally influential carbon market.

China has already established a national carbon emissions trading market for major emission sources to fulfill mandatory reduction obligations. Furthermore, a voluntary greenhouse gas reduction trading market has been developed to encourage self-reduction efforts by the broader society.

“These two markets operate independently but are connected through an offsetting mechanism that allows the surrender of allowances. Together, they form a unified national carbon market system that ensures full coverage of emitters,” explained Xia Yingxian, an official with China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment.

In March this year, the mandatory carbon market expanded for the first time to include the steel, cement, and aluminum smelting industries – sectors responsible for over 60 percent of China’s total carbon dioxide emissions. 

Since 2023, China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment, in collaboration with relevant departments, has issued six methodologies, including those for afforestation carbon sinks and offshore wind power, progressively expanding the voluntary carbon market. 

As of August 22 this year, the cumulative trading volume in the mandatory market had exceeded 680 million tons, with a transaction value of 47.41 billion yuan ($6.66 billion). The voluntary market recorded cumulative trading of 2.49 million tons of certified voluntary emission reductions, totaling 210 million yuan.

To reinforce institutional development, China’s Ministry of Ecology and Environment and relevant departments have introduced more than 30 regulations and technical standards, establishing a multi-tiered and relatively comprehensive regulatory framework for the carbon market. Authorities have intensified supervision of data quality, employing digital tools to issue early warnings on potential data risks and cracking down on the falsification of carbon emissions data. 

“After years of development, China has established a preliminary carbon market system with distinctive Chinese characteristics. A carbon pricing mechanism centered around the carbon market is steadily taking shape,” said Yan Gang, head of the South China Institute of Environmental Sciences under the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. 

The acceleration of carbon market development will allow the market to play a decisive role in resource allocation, stimulate widespread participation in green and low-carbon practices, and spur innovation in low-carbon, zero-carbon, and negative-carbon technologies. This is crucial for fulfilling emission reduction responsibilities, achieving dual carbon targets, and reducing overall abatement costs for society.

The newly released guideline outlines a clear “timetable” and “roadmap” for the future development of the national carbon market.

From the perspective of the mandatory carbon market, by 2027, the coverage will gradually extend beyond the existing power generation, steel, cement, and aluminum industries to include other major industrial emitters.

In the voluntary carbon market, which currently includes renewable energy, methane reduction, energy efficiency, and forestry carbon sinks, new areas such as biomass utilization, solid waste treatment will be incorporated, with comprehensive sector coverage by 2027. By 2030, China aims to establish a voluntary carbon market that is trustworthy, transparent, standardized, widely accessible, and aligned with international standards.

The management of emissions allowances is essential for ensuring the efficient and orderly operation of the Chinese national carbon market and achieving policy objectives. The guideline stresses the need for a predictable and transparent system for carbon quota allocation.

According to Xia, China currently adopts an intensity-based approach to allowance allocation. Moving forward, in line with the “dual carbon” goals, the nation will gradually shift to a cap-based system. By 2027, industries with relatively stable emissions will face absolute caps, with a pre-established national emissions cap allocated to enterprises through a top-down approach.

At the same time, China will explore both free and paid allocation methods, establish an allowance reserve, and introduce a market adjustment mechanism to balance supply and demand, thereby enhancing market stability, liquidity, and risk management capabilities.

By advancing the development of its carbon market, China will combine an effective market with proactive government policies to ensure a vibrant yet well-regulated system, thereby unleashing green productivity, creating new quality productive forces, and driving the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development.